An Adaptive Method for Vein Recognition Enhancement Using Deep Learning

Authentication methods based on some human traits including fingerprints, face, and palm prints, have developed significantly, and currently are sophisticated enough to be reliably considered for identification purposes. As state-of-the-art techniques, computational methods have recently been introduced to extract vein patterns for identification purposes. However, these methods suffer in a lack of image enhancement which the vein pattern cannot be uncovered properly. To address image enhancement weaknesses, this paper proposes a new image enhancement method based on deep learning, which can improve the robustness of vein recognition and feature extraction. Making use of deep neural network techniques, a sparse auto-encoder algorithm is applied to develop an adaptive method for image enhancement. We use a pair of synchronised colour and near-infrared images for verifying the outcome of the proposed method and measure the length of veins. The experimental results on 605 colour images and 605 infrared images from 66 forearms, 66 thighs, 33 chests, 33 ankles, and 50 random internet images show that the proposed enhancement method significantly improves the feature extraction procedure.

[1]  Adams Wai-Kin Kong,et al.  Uncovering vein patterns from color skin images for forensic analysis , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[2]  Richa Singh,et al.  Group sparse autoencoder , 2017, Image Vis. Comput..

[3]  Adams Wai-Kin Kong,et al.  Matching vein patterns from color images for forensic investigation , 2012, 2012 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS).

[4]  Glendon W. Gee,et al.  2.4 Particle-Size Analysis , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[5]  Norimichi Tsumura,et al.  Independent Component Analysis of Skin Color Image , 1998, CIC.

[6]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Adaptive approach to accurate analysis of small-diameter vessels in cineangiograms , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Sharath Pankanti,et al.  Biometrics: Personal Identification in Networked Society , 2013 .

[8]  John R. Hershey,et al.  Approximating the Kullback Leibler Divergence Between Gaussian Mixture Models , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - ICASSP '07.

[9]  David J. Field,et al.  Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1? , 1997, Vision Research.

[10]  Hamid R. Sharifzadeh,et al.  Vein Pattern Visualization through Multiple Mapping Models and Local Parameter Estimation for Forensic Investigation , 2014, 2014 22nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[11]  Gunilla Borgefors,et al.  Distance transformations in digital images , 1986, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[12]  Yuhong Dai Nonlinear Conjugate Gradient Methods , 2011 .

[13]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Standard deviations and standard errors , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  Nitzan Lebovic Biometrics, or The Power of the Radical Center , 2015, Critical Inquiry.

[15]  Daniel Riccio,et al.  Biometric Authentication , 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[16]  Ela Claridge,et al.  From Colour to Tissue Histology: Physics Based Interpretation of Images of Pigmented Skin Lesions , 2002, MICCAI.

[17]  Iman Tabatabaei Ardekani,et al.  Extended Abstract: A Review of Biometric Traits with Insight into Vein Pattern Recognition , 2018, 2018 16th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST).