Modeling the rejection probability in plant imports.

Phytosanitary inspection of imported plants and flowers is a major means for preventing pest invasions through international trade, but in a majority of countries availability of resources prevents inspection of all imports. Prediction of the likelihood of pest infestation in imported shipments could help maximize the efficiency of inspection by targeting inspection on shipments with the highest likelihood of infestation. This paper applies a multinomial logistic (MNL) regression model to data on import inspections of ornamental plant commodities in the Netherlands from 1998 to 2001 to investigate whether it is possible to predict the probability that a shipment will be (i) accepted for import, (ii) rejected for import because of detected pests, or (iii) rejected due to other reasons. Four models were estimated: (i) an all-species model, including all plant imports (136,251 shipments) in the data set, (ii) a four-species model, including records on the four ornamental commodities that accounted for 28.9% of inspected and 49.5% of rejected shipments, and two models for single commodities with large import volumes and percentages of rejections, (iii) Dianthus (16.9% of inspected and 46.3% of rejected shipments), and (iv) Chrysanthemum (6.9 and 8.6%, respectively). All models were highly significant (P < 0.001). The models for Dianthus and Chrysanthemum and for the set of four ornamental commodities showed a better fit to data than the model for all ornamental commodities. Variables that characterized the imported shipment's region of origin, the shipment's size, the company that imported the shipment, and season and year of import, were significant in most of the estimated models. The combined results of this study suggest that the MNL model can be a useful tool for modeling the probability of rejecting imported commodities even with a small set of explanatory variables. The MNL model can be helpful in better targeting of resources for import inspection. The inspecting agencies could enable development of these models by appropriately recording inspection results.

[1]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[2]  A. Albert,et al.  On the existence of maximum likelihood estimates in logistic regression models , 1984 .

[3]  J. E. Frey,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative analysis of accidental insect pest introduction into Switzerland and its implications for plant protection1 , 1992 .

[4]  J. H. Frank,et al.  The immigration of insects to Florida, with a tabulation of records published since 1970 , 1992 .

[5]  P. Jenkins.  Free Trade and Exotic Species Introductions , 1996 .

[6]  David J. Hand,et al.  Statistical Classification Methods in Consumer Credit Scoring: a Review , 1997 .

[7]  J. A. Calvin.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1998 .

[8]  N. Roozen,et al.  Dutch quarantine strategies applied to glasshouse pests , 1999 .

[9]  W. Werf,et al.  Sampling and monitoring in crop protection. The theoretical basis for developing practical decision guides. , 2000 .

[10]  S. Menard.  Coefficients of Determination for Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis , 2000 .

[11]  F. Campbell.  The Science of Risk Assessment for Phytosanitary Regulation and the Impact of Changing Trade Regulations , 2001 .

[12]  R. Haack.  Intercepted Scolytidae (Coleoptera) at U.S. ports of Entry: 1985–2000 , 2001 .

[13]  R. Venette,et al.  Strategies and statistics of sampling for rare individuals. , 2002, Annual review of entomology.

[14]  G. Ruiz,et al.  Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. , 2003 .

[15]  A. Carriquiry,et al.  Impact of Management Practices on Prevalence of Soybean Sclerotinia Stem Rot in the North-Central United States and on Farmers' Decisions Under Uncertainty. , 2003, Plant disease.

[16]  L. Madden,et al.  New applications of statistical tools in plant pathology. , 2004, Phytopathology.

[17]  Thomas T. Dobbs,et al.  CARGO AIRCRAFT AS A PATHWAY FOR the Entry of nonindigenous pests INTO SOUTH FLORIDA , 2004 .

[18]  T. Work,et al.  Arrival rate of nonindigenous insect species into the United States through foreign trade , 2005, Biological Invasions.

[19]  Thomas T. Dobbs,et al.  Arrivals of Hitchhiking Insect Pests on International Cargo Aircraft at Miami International Airport , 2006, Biological Invasions.

[20]  David Pimentel,et al.  Willard W. Cochrane, The Curse of American Agricultural Abundance: A Sustainable Solution, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln (2003) ISBN 0803215290 145 pp , 2005 .

[21]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States , 2005 .

[22]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Interceptions of Nonindigenous Plant Pests at US Ports of Entry and Border Crossings Over a 17-year Period , 2006, Biological Invasions.

[23]  L. Madden,et al.  An assessment model for rating high-threat crop pathogens. , 2006, Phytopathology.

[24]  Alain Roques,et al.  Tentative analysis of the interceptions of non-indigenous organisms in Europe during 1995-2004 , 2006 .

[25]  DESIGNING OPTIMAL PHYTOSANITARY INSPECTION POLICY , 2006 .

[26]  M. Kimberley,et al.  Interception frequency of exotic bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) and relationship with establishment in New Zealand and worldwide , 2006 .

[27]  A.G.J.M. Oude Lansink,et al.  Designing optimal phytosanitary inspection policy: a conceptual framework and an application , 2007 .

[28]  A. MacLeoda,et al.  Integrating drivers influencing the detection of plant pests carried in the international cut flower trade , 2008 .