Developing practical techniques for quantitative assessment of ecosystem services on farmland

Abstract The application of the concept of ecosystem services in the context of environmental management of agricultural landscapes is a relatively new and developing topic. There is increasing demand for the delivery of ecosystem services, especially with respect to ensuring that outcomes from policy interventions are realised. Consequently, there is a need for knowledge, tools and techniques to aid the identification of appropriate options for the given circumstances. This paper presents the outputs from a study that aimed to derive practical approaches that could be used to quantify ecosystem services from features on farmland in Europe. More specifically it aimed to integrate the outputs from the Quantification of Ecological Services for Sustainable Agriculture project into an existing prototype software package (the Ecological Focus Areas Calculator). The ecosystem services explored are soil erosion; pollination; pest control; aesthetics; and carbon sequestration. Following an explanation of the methodology, case study landscape features are used to illustrate the outputs generated. The quantitative outputs are also compared to the outputs from the existing qualitative techniques in the Ecological Focus Areas Calculator to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of the two approaches. The study concludes that the development of more quantitative approaches is an improvement over more qualitative techniques. However, quantitative techniques are not available for all ecosystem services, whereas the qualitative approach covers more ecosystem services and thus provides a more holistic perspective. It will be important to further develop the techniques as new science emerges; to ground truth the techniques to confirm and improve their reliability; and to improve delivery tools to meet the requirements of different end users which may evolve in the future. As the intellectual, economic and technical capacity of the land management sector increases, the level of sophistication that is be deemed to be practical will also evolve, thus the tools and techniques available need to keep pace with this.

[1]  Luca Montanarella,et al.  Soil erosion risk assessment in Europe , 2000 .

[2]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Big data: the management revolution. , 2012, Harvard business review.

[3]  E. Noe,et al.  Opportunities and challenges for multicriteria assessment of food system sustainability , 2016 .

[4]  J. Losey,et al.  The Economic Value of Ecological Services Provided by Insects , 2006 .

[5]  Louise Willemen,et al.  A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services , 2013 .

[6]  John Cairns,et al.  The Relationship Between Ecosystem Health and Delivery of Ecosystem Services , 1995 .

[7]  Gary W. Johnson,et al.  A Methodology for Adaptable and Robust Ecosystem Services Assessment , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  R. D. Groot,et al.  The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes , 2010 .

[9]  A.P.E. van Oudenhoven,et al.  Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services , 2012 .

[10]  S. Hamilton,et al.  Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits , 2007 .

[11]  P. Verburg,et al.  Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape , 2014 .

[12]  Stephen Polasky,et al.  Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural‐Resource Management , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  M. Lefebvre,et al.  European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: a review , 2013, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[14]  H. Daly,et al.  Natural Capital and Sustainable Development , 1992 .

[15]  David C Rose,et al.  Finding the right connection: what makes a successful decision support system? , 2018, Food and energy security.

[16]  Barbara M. Smith,et al.  Agri-environment scheme enhancing ecosystem services: A demonstration of improved biological control in cereal crops , 2012 .

[17]  Panos Panagos,et al.  A classification of water erosion models according to their geospatial characteristics , 2014, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[18]  Francesco Vanni,et al.  Time to look for evidence: Results-based approach to biodiversity conservation on farmland in Europe , 2018 .

[19]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  What works in conservation? Using expert assessment of summarised evidence to identify practices that enhance natural pest control in agriculture , 2016, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[20]  Dionysis Bochtis,et al.  Conceptual model of a future farm management information system , 2010 .

[21]  Panos Panagos,et al.  The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe , 2015 .

[22]  Grazia Zulian,et al.  Linking Land Cover Data and Crop Yields for Mapping and Assessment of Pollination Services in Europe , 2013 .

[23]  S. Jesus,et al.  Payments for Forest Ecosystem Services - SWOT Analysis and Possibilities for Implementation , 2016 .

[24]  Panos Panagos,et al.  Rainfall erosivity in Europe. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[25]  D. Landis.  Designing agricultural landscapes for biodiversity-based ecosystem services , 2017 .

[26]  Nancy Alonistioti,et al.  Farm management systems and the Future Internet era , 2012 .

[27]  W. H. Wischmeier,et al.  Predicting rainfall erosion losses : a guide to conservation planning , 1978 .

[28]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  A quantitative assessment of policy options for no net loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services in the European Union , 2016 .

[29]  Spyros Fountas,et al.  Farm management information systems: Current situation and future perspectives , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[30]  L. Couldrick,et al.  Payments for ecosystem services: A best practice guide , 2013 .

[31]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Bundles of ecosystem (dis)services and multifunctionality across European landscapes. , 2017 .

[32]  G Finnveden,et al.  Life cycle assessment part 2: current impact assessment practice. , 2004, Environment international.

[33]  A. Green,et al.  An indicator framework to help maximise potential benefits for ecosystem services and biodiversity from ecological focus areas , 2016 .

[34]  J. Farley,et al.  Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global , 2010 .

[35]  J. Biesmeijer,et al.  Summary for policymakers of the assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) on pollinators, pollination and food production , 2016 .

[36]  J. Bennett,et al.  Can payments for ecosystem services schemes mimic markets , 2017 .

[37]  J. Settele,et al.  Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline , 2009 .

[38]  John M. Holland,et al.  A pan-European model of landscape potential to support natural pest control services , 2018, Ecological Indicators.

[39]  C. Görg,et al.  Benefits and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making: Some stakeholder perspectives , 2013 .

[40]  E. Huber‐Sannwald,et al.  Application of ecosystem services in natural resource management decision making , 2017, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[41]  Paolo Lazzari,et al.  Estimating the value of carbon sequestration ecosystem services in the Mediterranean Sea: An ecological economics approach , 2015 .

[42]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Extinction, Substitution, and Ecosystem Services , 1983 .

[43]  Benoit Aubert,et al.  IT as enabler of sustainable farming: An empirical analysis of farmers' adoption decision of precision agriculture technology , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[44]  Heli Saarikoski,et al.  Editorial: Operationalisation of natural capital and ecosystem services – Special issue , 2017 .

[45]  David C. Rose,et al.  Decision support tools for agriculture: Towards effective design and delivery , 2016 .

[46]  Iain Fraser,et al.  On the Value of Soil Resources in the Context of Natural Capital and Ecosystem Service Delivery , 2014 .

[47]  I. M. Bouwma,et al.  Adoption of the ecosystem services concept in EU policies , 2017 .

[48]  Emad Samuel Malki Ebeid,et al.  Open geospatial infrastructure for data management and analytics in interdisciplinary research , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[49]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[50]  David C. Rose,et al.  Involving stakeholders in agricultural decision support systems: improving user-centred design , 2018 .

[51]  G. R. Foster,et al.  Predicting soil erosion by water : a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) , 1997 .

[52]  Daniella Malin,et al.  A farm-focused calculator for emissions from crop and livestock production , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[53]  Daniele de Rigo,et al.  Modelling soil erosion at European scale: towards harmonization and reproducibility , 2014 .

[54]  Tobias Purtauf,et al.  Relative importance of predators and parasitoids for cereal aphid control , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.