Gunther Anders was speaking for the age of nuclear weapons when he noted that technological capabilities exceed human comprehension. Genetically modified organisms, pervasive computing in smart environments, and envisioned nanotechnological applications pose a similar challenge; powerful technological interventions elude comprehension if only by being too small, or too big, to register in human perception and experience. The most advanced technological research programs are thus bringing about a curiously regressive inversion of the relation between humans, technology, and nature. No longer a means of controlling nature in order to protect, shield, or empower humans, technology dissolves into nature and becomes uncanny, incomprehensible, beyond perceptual and conceptual control. Technology might thus end up being as enchanted and perhaps frightening as nature used to be when humanity started the technological process of disenchantment and rationalization. Good design might counteract this inversion, for example, by creating human interfaces even with technologies that are meant to be too small to be experienced.
[1]
Torsten Rossmann,et al.
Bionik : aktuelle Forschungsergebnisse in Natur-, Ingenieur- und Geisteswissenschaft
,
2005
.
[2]
Alfred Nordmann,et al.
Noumenal Technology: Reflections on the Incredible Tininess of Nano
,
2005
.
[3]
R. Hooke.
Micrographia: Or Some Physiological Descriptions of Minute Bodies Made by Magnifying Glasses With Observations and Inquiries Thereupon
,
2003
.
[4]
Maximilian Weber.
Gesammelte Aufsatze Zur Wissenschaftslehre
,
2009
.
[5]
Andrew Clement.
If "small is beautiful," is micro marvellous?: a look at micro-computing as if people mattered
,
1978,
PCNOTE.
[6]
Joy Bill,et al.
Why the future doesn’t need us
,
2003
.
[7]
Alfred Nordmann,et al.
Nanotechnology's worldview: new space for old cosmologies
,
2004,
IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.