CMOL: Devices, Circuits, and Architectures

This chapter is a brief review of the recent work on various aspects of the prospective hybrid semiconductor/nanowire/molecular ("CMOL") integrated circuits. The basic idea of such circuits is to combine the advantages ofthe currently dominating CMOS technology (including its flexibility and high fabrication yield) with those of molecular devices with nanometer-scale footprint. Two-terminal molecular devices would be self-assembled on a pre-fabricated nanowire crossbar fabric, enabling very high function density at acceptable fabrication costs. Preliminary estimates show that the density of active devices in CMOL circuits may be as high as 10 1 2 cm - 2 and that they may provide an unparalleled information processing performance, up to 10 2 0 operations per cm 2 per second, at manageable power consumption. However, CMOL technology imposes substantial requirements (most importantly, that of high defect tolerance) on circuit architectures. In the view of these restrictions, the most straightforward application of CMOL circuits is terabitscale memories, in which powerful bad-bit-exclusion and error-correction techniques may be used to boost the defect tolerance. The implementation of Boolean logic circuits is more problematic, though our preliminary results for reconfigurable, uniform FPGA-like CMOL circuits look very encouraging. Finally, CMOL technology seems to be uniquely suitable for the implementation of the "CrossNet" family of neuromorphic networks for advanced information processing including, at least, pattern recognition and classification, and quite possibly much more intelligent tasks. We believe that these application prospects justify a large-scale research and development effort focused on the main challenge of the field, the high-yield self-assembly of molecular devices.

[1]  J. von Neumann,et al.  Probabilistic Logic and the Synthesis of Reliable Organisms from Unreliable Components , 1956 .

[2]  Harold S. Stone,et al.  A Parallel Algorithm for the Efficient Solution of a General Class of Recurrence Equations , 1973, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[3]  Jonathan Rose,et al.  Architecture of field-programmable gate arrays: the effect of logic block functionality on area efficiency , 1990 .

[4]  Anders Krogh,et al.  Introduction to the theory of neural computation , 1994, The advanced book program.

[5]  A. El Gamal,et al.  PLA-based FPGA Area Versus Cell C+ Granularity , 1992, 1992 Proceedings of the IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference.

[6]  Wei Zheng,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of single‐electron transistors and traps , 1994 .

[7]  Jan M. Rabaey,et al.  Digital Integrated Circuits: A Design Perspective , 1995 .

[8]  William D. Brown,et al.  Nonvolatile Semiconductor Memory Technology , 1997 .

[9]  Andrew G. Barto,et al.  Reinforcement learning , 1998 .

[10]  Gregory S. Snider,et al.  A Defect-Tolerant Computer Architecture: Opportunities for Nanotechnology , 1998 .

[11]  Konstantin K. Likharev,et al.  Single-electron devices and their applications , 1999, Proc. IEEE.

[12]  K. L. Jensen,et al.  Field emitter arrays for plasma and microwave source applications , 1999 .

[13]  Stoddart,et al.  Electronically configurable molecular-based logic gates , 1999, Science.

[14]  Paul L. McEuen,et al.  Nanomechanical oscillations in a single-C60 transistor , 2000, Nature.

[15]  J. F. Stoddart,et al.  A [2]Catenane-Based Solid State Electronically Reconfigurable Switch , 2000 .

[16]  Konstantin K. Likharev,et al.  Riding the crest of a new wave in memory [NOVORAM] , 2000 .

[17]  Janos H. Fendler,et al.  Chemical Self-assembly for Electronic Applications , 2001 .

[18]  S. Folling,et al.  Single-electron latching switches as nanoscale synapses , 2001, IJCNN'01. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37222).

[19]  Yuan Taur,et al.  Device scaling limits of Si MOSFETs and their application dependencies , 2001, Proc. IEEE.

[20]  C. M. Sotomayor Torres,et al.  Nanoimprint lithography: challenges and prospects , 2001 .

[21]  Zhenan Bao,et al.  Conductance of small molecular junctions. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[22]  V. V. Kislov,et al.  Molecular clusters as building blocks for nanoelectronics: the first demonstration of a cluster single-electron tunnelling transistor at room temperature , 2002 .

[23]  Jonas I. Goldsmith,et al.  Coulomb blockade and the Kondo effect in single-atom transistors , 2002, Nature.

[24]  Arthur H. Guenther International Trends in Applied Optics , 2002 .

[25]  Özgür Türel,et al.  CrossNets: possible neuromorphic networks based on nanoscale components , 2003, Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl..

[26]  Andreas Mayr,et al.  CrossNets: High‐Performance Neuromorphic Architectures for CMOL Circuits , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[27]  J. F. Stoddart,et al.  Nanoscale molecular-switch crossbar circuits , 2003 .

[28]  Konstantin K. Likharev,et al.  Electronics Below 10 nm , 2003 .

[29]  André DeHon,et al.  Stochastic assembly of sublithographic nanoscale interfaces , 2003 .

[30]  Seth Copen Goldstein,et al.  Molecular electronics: from devices and interconnect to circuits and architecture , 2003, Proc. IEEE.

[31]  Ian A. Walmsley,et al.  Quantum Physics Under Control , 2003 .

[32]  Jan M. Rabaey,et al.  Digital integrated circuits: a design perspective / Jan M. Rabaey, Anantha Chandrakasan, Borivoje Nikolic , 2003 .

[33]  T. J. Walls,et al.  Nanoscale silicon MOSFETs: A theoretical study , 2003 .

[34]  Anatoli Korkin,et al.  Nano and Giga Challenges in Microelectronics , 2003 .

[35]  C. Lieber,et al.  Nanowire Crossbar Arrays as Address Decoders for Integrated Nanosystems , 2003, Science.

[36]  Mircea R. Stan,et al.  CMOS/nano co-design for crossbar-based molecular electronic systems , 2003 .

[37]  Jean-Luc Brédas,et al.  Single-electron transistor of a single organic molecule with access to several redox states , 2003, Nature.

[38]  Jonathan Rose,et al.  The effect of LUT and cluster size on deep-submicron FPGA performance and density , 2004 .

[39]  S. Roy,et al.  Multiplexing schemes for cost-effective fault-tolerance , 2004, 4th IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology, 2004..

[40]  André DeHon,et al.  Law of large numbers system design , 2004 .

[41]  J. Rose,et al.  The effect of LUT and cluster size on deep-submicron FPGA performance and density , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems.

[42]  S.R.J. Brueck,et al.  There are no fundamental limits to optical nanolithography , 2004, The 17th Annual Meeting of the IEEELasers and Electro-Optics Society, 2004. LEOS 2004..

[43]  Chongwu Zhou,et al.  Multilevel memory based on molecular devices , 2004 .

[44]  R. I. Bahar,et al.  Nano, Quantum and Molecular Computing , 2004, Springer US.

[45]  Herbert S. Bennett Compound Semiconductor Roadmap Embedded in the 2003 International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors | NIST , 2004 .

[46]  Konstantin K. Likharev,et al.  Neuromorphic architectures for nanoelectronic circuits , 2004, Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl..

[47]  Michael J. Wilson,et al.  Nanowire-based sublithographic programmable logic arrays , 2004, FPGA '04.

[48]  Mark A. Ratner,et al.  Molecular electronics , 2005 .

[49]  Jung Hoon Lee,et al.  CMOL CrossNets as Pattern Classifiers , 2005, IWANN.

[50]  Mark A. Reed,et al.  Intrinsic Electronic Conduction Mechanisms in Self-Assembled Monolayers , 2005 .

[51]  D. Stewart,et al.  The crossbar latch: Logic value storage, restoration, and inversion in crossbar circuits , 2005 .

[52]  D. Strukov,et al.  Prospects for terabit-scale nanoelectronic memories , 2004 .

[53]  Dmitri B. Strukov,et al.  A reconfigurable architecture for hybrid CMOS/Nanodevice circuits , 2006, FPGA '06.

[54]  Matthew M. Ziegler,et al.  Architectures and Simulations for Nanoprocessor Systems Integrated on the Molecular Scale , 2006 .