Sensing the flow beneath the fins

Flow sensing, maneuverability, energy efficiency and vigilance of surroundings are the key factors that dictate the performance of marine animals. Be it swimming at high speeds, attack or escape maneuvers, sensing and survival hydrodynamics are a constant feature of life in the ocean. Fishes are capable of performing energy efficient maneuvers, including capturing energy from vortical structures in water. These impressive capabilities are made possible by the uncanny ability of fish to sense minute pressure and flow variations on their body. This is achieved by arrays of biological neuromast sensors on their bodies that 'feel' the surroundings through 'touch at a distance' sensing. The main focus of this paper is to review the various biomimetic material approaches in developing superficial neuromast inspired ultrasensitive MEMS sensors. Principals and methods that translate biomechanical filtering properties of canal neuromasts to benefit artificial MEMS sensors have also been discussed. MEMS sensors with ultrahigh flow sensitivity and accuracy have been developed mainly through inspiration from the hair cell and cupula structures in the neuromast. Canal-inspired packages have proven beneficial in hydrodynamic flow filtering in artificial sensors enabling signal amplification and noise attenuation. A special emphasis has been placed on the recent innovations that closely mimic the structural and material designs of stereocilia of neuromasts by exploring soft polymers.

[1]  Sheryl Coombs,et al.  The Hydrodynamics and Structural Mechanics of the Lateral Line System , 2006 .

[2]  E. Hassan,et al.  On the discrimination of spatial intervals by the blind cave fish (Anoptichthys jordani) , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[3]  Sietse M. van Netten,et al.  Laser interferometric measurements on the dynamic behaviour of the cupula in the fish lateral line , 1987, Hearing Research.

[4]  Adrian Klein,et al.  Micro-Machined Flow Sensors Mimicking Lateral Line Canal Neuromasts , 2015, Micromachines.

[5]  Horst Bleckmann,et al.  Lateral line canal morphology and signal to noise ratio , 2011, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[6]  D. Reneker,et al.  Hydrogel microstructures combined with electrospun fibers and photopatterning for shape and modulus control , 2008 .

[7]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  Flow Vision for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles via an Artificial Lateral Line , 2011, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[8]  Massimo De Vittorio,et al.  Biomimetics of underwater hair cell sensing , 2015 .

[9]  Horst Bleckmann,et al.  Lateral line system of fish. , 2009, Integrative zoology.

[10]  J. Montgomery,et al.  The Mechanosensory Lateral Line System of the Hypogean form of Astyanax Fasciatus , 2001, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[11]  Yingchen Yang,et al.  Artificial lateral line canal for hydrodynamic detection , 2011 .

[12]  Mohsen Asadnia,et al.  Touch at a distance sensing: lateral-line inspired MEMS flow sensors , 2014, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[13]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  Distant touch hydrodynamic imaging with an artificial lateral line , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  J. Kelly,et al.  Topography and mechanics of the cupula in the fish lateral line. I. Variation of cupular structure and composition in three dimensions , 1991, Journal of morphology.

[15]  A. G. P. Kottapalli,et al.  Electrospun nanofibrils encapsulated in hydrogel cupula for biomimetic MEMS flow sensor development , 2013, 2013 IEEE 26th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS).

[16]  H. Bleckmann,et al.  Hydrodynamic Trail-Following in Harbor Seals (Phoca vitulina) , 2001, Science.

[17]  Shane P. Windsor,et al.  The flow fields involved in hydrodynamic imaging by blind Mexican cave fish (Astyanax fasciatus). Part II: gliding parallel to a wall , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[18]  Matthew J. McHenry,et al.  The flexural stiffness of superficial neuromasts in the zebrafish (Danio rerio) lateral line , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  J. Engel,et al.  Design and Characterization of Artificial Haircell Sensor for Flow Sensing With Ultrahigh Velocity and Angular Sensitivity , 2007, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[20]  D P Corey,et al.  Two mechanisms for transducer adaptation in vertebrate hair cells. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  J. Montgomery,et al.  The lateral line can mediate rheotaxis in fish , 1997, Nature.

[22]  A. Kottapalli,et al.  Artificial fish skin of self-powered micro-electromechanical systems hair cells for sensing hydrodynamic flow phenomena , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[23]  S. Dijkgraaf THE FUNCTIONING and SIGNIFICANCE OF THE LATERAL‐LINE ORGANS , 1963, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[24]  Nannan Chen,et al.  Hydrogel‐Encapsulated Microfabricated Haircells Mimicking Fish Cupula Neuromast , 2007 .

[25]  J. J. Schneider,et al.  A nano-microstructured artificial-hair-cell-type sensor based on topologically graded 3D carbon nanotube bundles , 2016, Nanotechnology.

[26]  Adrian Klein,et al.  μ-biomimetic flow-sensors—introducing light-guiding PDMS structures into MEMS , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[27]  Chang Liu,et al.  Micromachined biomimetic artificial haircell sensors , 2007, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[28]  Gabriel Weymouth,et al.  Hydrodynamic object recognition using pressure sensing , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[29]  Sheryl Coombs,et al.  Smart Skins: Information Processing by Lateral Line Flow Sensors , 2001, Auton. Robots.

[30]  C. Campenhausen,et al.  Detection of stationary objects by the blind Cave FishAnoptichthys jordani (Characidae) , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[31]  K. D. Karavitaki,et al.  From Biological Cilia to Artificial Flow Sensors: Biomimetic Soft Polymer Nanosensors with High Sensing Performance , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[32]  Shane P. Windsor,et al.  The influence of viscous hydrodynamics on the fish lateral-line system. , 2009, Integrative and comparative biology.

[33]  Kyle D. Anderson,et al.  Bioinspired Material Approaches to Sensing , 2009 .

[34]  H. Bleckmann,et al.  Determination of object position, vortex shedding frequency and flow velocity using artificial lateral line canals , 2011, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[35]  T Teyke,et al.  Morphological differences in neuromasts of the blind cave fish Astyanax hubbsi and the sighted river fish Astyanax mexicanus. , 1990, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[36]  Shane P. Windsor,et al.  The flow fields involved in hydrodynamic imaging by blind Mexican cave fish (Astyanax fasciatus). Part I: open water and heading towards a wall , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[37]  Junliang Tao,et al.  Hair flow sensors: from bio-inspiration to bio-mimicking—a review , 2012 .

[38]  A. Kottapalli,et al.  Nanofibril scaffold assisted MEMS artificial hydrogel neuromasts for enhanced sensitivity flow sensing , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[39]  Peng Liu,et al.  A Review of Artificial Lateral Line in Sensor Fabrication and Bionic Applications for Robot Fish , 2016, Applied bionics and biomechanics.

[40]  S. Coombs,et al.  Biologically inspired design of hydrogel-capped hair sensors for enhanced underwater flow detection , 2009 .

[41]  Shane P Windsor,et al.  Swimming kinematics and hydrodynamic imaging in the blind Mexican cave fish (Astyanax fasciatus) , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[42]  Remco Wiegerink,et al.  Imaging dipole flow sources using an artificial lateral-line system made of biomimetic hair flow sensors , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[43]  Sheryl Coombs,et al.  Biology of the mechanosensory lateral line in fishes , 1995, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[44]  Tan Shi-zhe,et al.  Underwater artificial lateral line flow sensors , 2014 .

[45]  William Megill,et al.  Stress-Driven Artificial Hair Cell for Flow Sensing , 2014 .

[46]  G. Lauder,et al.  Fish Exploiting Vortices Decrease Muscle Activity , 2003, Science.

[47]  G. Lauder,et al.  The Kármán gait: novel body kinematics of rainbow trout swimming in a vortex street , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[48]  A J Hudspeth,et al.  DIRECTIONAL SENSITIVITY OF INDIVIDUAL VERTEBRATE HAIR CELLS TO CONTROLLED DEFLECTION OF THEIR HAIR BUNDLES * , 1981, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[49]  M. Triantafyllou,et al.  Optimal Thrust Development in Oscillating Foils with Application to Fish Propulsion , 1993 .

[50]  J. Montgomery,et al.  Disrupted flow sensing impairs hydrodynamic performance and increases the metabolic cost of swimming in the yellowtail kingfish, Seriola lalandi , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[51]  Horst Bleckmann,et al.  The functional significance of lateral line canal morphology on the trunk of the marine teleost Xiphister atropurpureus (Stichaeidae) , 2013, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[52]  Laurens E Howle,et al.  Hydrodynamic flow control in marine mammals. , 2008, Integrative and comparative biology.

[53]  D. Soares,et al.  Neurology: An ancient sensory organ in crocodilians , 2002, Nature.

[54]  K. Yanase,et al.  Unsteady turbulent boundary layers in swimming rainbow trout , 2015, The Journal of Experimental Biology.