The Open Brain Consent: Informing research participants and obtaining consent to share brain imaging data

Having the means to share research data openly is essential to modern science. For human research, a key aspect in this endeavor is obtaining consent from participants, not just to take part in a study, which is a basic ethical principle, but also to share their data with the scientific community. To ensure that the participants' privacy is respected, national and/or supranational regulations and laws are in place. It is, however, not always clear to researchers what the implications of those are, nor how to comply with them. The Open Brain Consent (https://open-brain-consent.readthedocs.io) is an international initiative that aims to provide researchers in the brain imaging community with information about data sharing options and tools. We present here a short history of this project and its latest developments, and share pointers to consent forms, including a template consent form that is compliant with the EU general data protection regulation. We also share pointers to an associated data user agreement that is not only useful in the EU context, but also for any researchers dealing with personal (clinical) data elsewhere.

[1]  Ananth Grama,et al.  De-anonymization Attacks on Neuroimaging Datasets , 2019, SIGMOD Conference.

[2]  Spyridon Bakas,et al.  Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[3]  J. Gilmore,et al.  Individual identification and individual variability analysis based on cortical folding features in developing infant singletons and twins , 2020, Human brain mapping.

[4]  O. Ciccarelli,et al.  Facing privacy in neuroimaging: removing facial features degrades performance of image analysis methods , 2019, European Radiology.

[5]  Luc Rocher,et al.  Estimating the success of re-identifications in incomplete datasets using generative models , 2019, Nature Communications.

[6]  D. Mascalzoni,et al.  The GDPR and the research exemption: considerations on the necessary safeguards for research biobanks , 2019, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[7]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Discovering heritable modes of MEG spectral power , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[8]  Anders Eklund,et al.  Refacing: Reconstructing Anonymized Facial Features Using Gans , 2018, bioRxiv.

[9]  Arno Klein,et al.  Assessment of the impact of shared brain imaging data on the scientific literature , 2018, Nature Communications.

[10]  Mark Elliot,et al.  Are 'pseudonymised' data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK , 2018, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[11]  Zhanpeng Jin,et al.  Permanence of the CEREBRE brain biometric protocol , 2017, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[12]  Anand D. Sarwate,et al.  COINSTAC: A Privacy Enabled Model and Prototype for Leveraging and Processing Decentralized Brain Imaging Data , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[13]  D. Bishop.  Open research practices: unintended consequences and suggestions for averting them. (Commentary on the Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative) , 2016, Royal Society Open Science.

[14]  K. Sim,et al.  Informed consent for human genetic and genomic studies: a systematic review , 2014, Clinical genetics.

[15]  M. Nachman,et al.  Morphological and population genomic evidence that human faces have evolved to signal individual identity , 2014, Nature Communications.

[16]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  The ENIGMA Consortium: large-scale collaborative analyses of neuroimaging and genetic data , 2014, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[17]  Oluwasanmi Koyejo,et al.  Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: the OpenfMRI project , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[18]  Eran Halperin,et al.  Identifying Personal Genomes by Surname Inference , 2013, Science.

[19]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Reliability of ERP and single-trial analyses , 2011, NeuroImage.

[20]  T. Ichida.  World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki , 1991, Gastroenterologia Japonica.