Manipulation of the Apparatus and Response Context may Reduce the US Pre-Exposure Interference Effect
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Randich. The US preexposure phenomenon in the conditioned suppression paradigm: A role for conditioned situational stimuli☆ , 1981 .
[2] A. Tomie,et al. Retardation of autoshaping following pretraining with unpredictable food: Effects of changing the context between pretraining and testing ☆ , 1980 .
[3] A. G. Baker,et al. Preexposure to the CS alone, US alone, or CS and US uncorrelated: Latent inhibition, blocking by context or learned irrelevance? , 1979 .
[4] J. Gibbon. Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. , 1977 .
[5] A. Tomie. Interference with autoshaping by prior context conditioning. , 1976 .
[6] A. Tomie. Retardation of Autoshaping: Control by Contextual Stimuli , 1976, Science.
[7] A. G. Baker. Learned Irrelevance and Learned Helplessness: Rats Learn that Stimuli, Reinforcers, and Responses are Uncorrelated. , 1976 .
[8] R. S. Rodger. THE NUMBER OF NON-ZERO, POST HOC CONTRASTS FROM ANOVA AND ERROR-RATE. I , 1975 .
[9] R. S. Rodger. Type I errors and their decision basis. , 1967, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.
[10] L. Kamin,et al. The conditioned emotional response as a function of intensity of the US. , 1961, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.
[11] H. Scheffé. A METHOD FOR JUDGING ALL CONTRASTS IN THE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE , 1953 .