Freeform surface selection based on parametric fitness function using modal wavefront fitting.

We present an analytic methodology to guide the selection of a surface within an optical design to apply freeform optimization. The methodology is discussed in the context of other means currently available, such as human intuition, aberration theory, and other direct surface construction methods. We describe the selection criteria for our proposed method and provide the form of the parametric fitness function used to combine the criterion. Finally, a case study comparing a design optimization procedure guided by the proposed methodology to human intuition is presented based on a real instrument designed for a millimeter-wave astronomy application. The methodology is shown to be effective even in the case of an optical system with a large number of freeform/optical surfaces. The proposed approach provides an objective and scalable solution to guide freeform optical system design by aiding a human's design intuition.

[1]  Bryan D. Stone,et al.  Foundations of first-order layout for asymmetric systems: An application of hamilton's methods , 1992 .

[2]  Andreas Tünnermann,et al.  Development, fabrication, and testing of an anamorphic imaging snap-together freeform telescope , 2015 .

[3]  Herbert Gross,et al.  Initial system design method for non-rotationally symmetric systems based on Gaussian brackets and Nodal aberration theory. , 2017, Optics express.

[4]  Guofan Jin,et al.  Multiple surface expansion method for design of freeform imaging systems. , 2018, Optics express.

[5]  E. Shirokoff,et al.  Hafnium Films and Magnetic Shielding for TIME, A mm-Wavelength Spectrometer Array , 2018 .

[6]  K. Thompson,et al.  Theory of aberration fields for general optical systems with freeform surfaces. , 2014, Optics express.

[7]  James H. Burge,et al.  Chebyshev gradient polynomials for high resolution surface and wavefront reconstruction , 2018, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[8]  Akira Yabe Method to allocate freeform surfaces in axially asymmetric optical systems , 2011, Optical Systems Design.

[9]  Bryan D. Stone,et al.  Foundations of second-order layout for asymmetric systems , 1992 .

[10]  D. W. Swift Image rotation devices — a comparative survey , 1972 .

[11]  Guo-Fan Jin,et al.  Automated design of freeform imaging systems , 2017, Light: Science & Applications.

[12]  Chang Liu,et al.  Numerical optimization strategy for multi-lens imaging systems containing freeform surfaces. , 2018, Applied optics.

[13]  Tong Yang,et al.  Direct design of freeform surfaces and freeform imaging systems with a point-by-point three-dimensional construction-iteration method. , 2015, Optics express.

[14]  Tong Yang,et al.  Starting configuration design method of freeform imaging and afocal systems with a real exit pupil. , 2016, Applied optics.

[15]  K. Thompson Description of the third-order optical aberrations of near-circular pupil optical systems without symmetry. , 2005, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[16]  Akira Yabe Representation of freeform surfaces suitable for optimization. , 2012, Applied optics.

[17]  Jannick P Rolland,et al.  Starting geometry creation and design method for freeform optics , 2018, Nature Communications.

[18]  Gregg E. Davis,et al.  Assembly of a freeform off-axis optical system employing three φ-polynomial Zernike mirrors. , 2014, Optics letters.

[19]  Jannick P. Rolland,et al.  Freeform Optical Surfaces: A Revolution in Imaging Optical Design , 2012 .

[20]  Ilhan Kaya,et al.  Comparative assessment of freeform polynomials as optical surface descriptions. , 2012, Optics express.

[21]  Zhu Jun,et al.  Design of a low F-number freeform off-axis three-mirror system with rectangular field-of-view , 2015 .