Quantum cognition and decision theories: A tutorial

Models of cognition and decision making based on quantum theory have been the subject of much interest recently. Quantum theory provides an alternative probabilistic framework for modelling decision making compared with classical probability theory, and has been successfully used to address behaviour considered paradoxical or irrational from a classical point of view. The purpose of this tutorial is to give an introduction to quantum models, with a particular emphasis on how to build these models in practice. Examples are provided by the study of order effects on judgements, and we will show how order effects arise from the structure of the theory. In particular, we show how to derive the recent discovery of a particular constraint on order effects implied by quantum models, called the Quantum Question (QQ) Equality, which does not appear to be derivable from alternative accounts, and which has been experimentally verified to high precision. However the general theory and methods of model construction we will describe are applicable to any quantum cognitive model. Our hope is that this tutorial will give researchers the confidence to construct simple quantum models of their own, particularly with a view to testing these against existing cognitive theories.

[1]  Jerome R Busemeyer,et al.  Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling? , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[2]  S. Hameroff,et al.  Quantum computation in brain microtubules: decoherence and biological feasibility. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Emmanuel M Pothos,et al.  Challenging the classical notion of time in cognition: a quantum perspective , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Emmanuel M. Pothos,et al.  Progress and current challenges with the quantum similarity model , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[5]  J. Schwinger UNITARY OPERATOR BASES. , 1960, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  A Quantum Question Order Model Supported by Empirical Tests of an A Priori and Precise Prediction , 2013, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[7]  H. Atmanspacher,et al.  Order Effects in Sequential Measurements of Non-Commuting Psychological Observables , 2012, 1201.4685.

[8]  Jennifer S Trueblood,et al.  A quantum geometric model of similarity. , 2013, Psychological review.

[9]  H. Stapp The importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes , 2000, quant-ph/0010029.

[10]  Emmanuel M. Pothos,et al.  A Quantum Probability Perspective on Borderline Vagueness , 2013, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[11]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[12]  J. Kleijnen,et al.  Context Effects , 2003 .

[13]  Asher Peres,et al.  Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods , 1994 .

[14]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  A Comparison of the Belief-Adjustment Model and the Quantum Inference Model as Explanations of Order Effects in Human Inference , 2010 .

[15]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics , 1989 .

[16]  W. Zurek Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical—Revisited , 2003, quant-ph/0306072.

[17]  Mark S. C. Reed,et al.  Method of Modern Mathematical Physics , 1972 .

[18]  W. Heitler The Principles of Quantum Mechanics , 1947, Nature.

[19]  Alan E Mark,et al.  Penrose-Hameroff orchestrated objective-reduction proposal for human consciousness is not biologically feasible. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  Laurianne Sitbon,et al.  A probabilistic framework for analysing the compositionality of conceptual combinations , 2013, ArXiv.

[21]  James M. Yearsley,et al.  Advanced tools and concepts for quantum cognition: A tutorial , 2017 .

[22]  I. Chuang,et al.  Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: Bibliography , 2010 .

[23]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Decision theory with prospect interference and entanglement , 2011, ArXiv.

[24]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[25]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[26]  G. Röpke,et al.  Operational Quantum Physics , 1997 .

[27]  W. Zurek The Environment, Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical , 1991 .

[28]  J. Linnett,et al.  Quantum mechanics , 1975, Nature.

[29]  H. Atmanspacher,et al.  Complementarity in Classical Dynamical Systems , 2006 .

[30]  Ingemar Bengtsson Three Ways to Look at Mutually Unbiased Bases , 2007 .

[31]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Concepts and Their Dynamics: A Quantum-Theoretic Modeling of Human Thought , 2012, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[32]  Peter beim Graben,et al.  Descriptive and Foundational Aspects of Quantum Cognition , 2014, 1410.3961.

[33]  Shmuel Zamir,et al.  Type Indeterminacy: A Model for the KT(Kahneman-Tversky)-Man , 2006, physics/0604166.

[34]  J.J.Halliwell How the Quantum Universe Became Classical , 2005 .

[35]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision , 2012 .

[36]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior , 2015 .

[37]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure: From Psychology to Finance , 2010 .

[38]  Jennifer Trueblood,et al.  A Quantum Probability Account of Order Effects in Inference , 2011, Cogn. Sci..

[39]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  The Potential of Using Quantum Theory to Build Models of Cognition , 2013, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[40]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Special issue on “Probabilistic models of cognition , 2022 .

[41]  Michael Reed,et al.  Methods of modern mathematical physics (vol.) I : functional analysis / Reed Michael, Barry Simon , 1980 .

[42]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  Context effects produced by question orders reveal quantum nature of human judgments , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Emmanuel M. Pothos,et al.  Sometimes it does hurt to ask: The constructive role of articulating impressions , 2014, Cognition.

[44]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  A proposed test of temporal nonlocality in bistable perception , 2010 .

[45]  R. Shankar,et al.  Principles of Quantum Mechanics , 2010 .

[46]  R. Penrose,et al.  Conscious Events as Orchestrated Space-Time Selections , 1996 .

[47]  K. Życzkowski,et al.  ON MUTUALLY UNBIASED BASES , 2010, 1004.3348.

[48]  Peter D. Kvam,et al.  Interference effects of choice on confidence: Quantum characteristics of evidence accumulation , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Structure in Cognition , 2008, 0805.3850.

[50]  Manuel E. Lladser,et al.  Quantum Computation , 2018, Scholarpedia.

[51]  David W. Moore Measuring New Types of Question-Order Effects: Additive and Subtractive , 2002 .

[52]  C. Fuchs,et al.  Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities , 2001, quant-ph/0106133.

[53]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  A quantum probability explanation for violations of ‘rational’ decision theory , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty , 1982 .