Configuration Learning in Underwater Optical Links

A new research problem named configuration learning is described in this work. A novel algorithm is proposed to address the configuration learning problem. The configuration learning problem is defined to be the optimization of the Machine Learning (ML) classifier to maximize the ML performance metric optimizing the transmitter configuration in the signal processing/communication systems. Specifically, this configuration learning problem is investigated in an underwater optical communication system with signal processing performance metric of the physical-layer communication throughput. A novel algorithm is proposed to perform the configuration learning by alternating optimization of key design parameters and switching between several Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) classifiers dependant on the learning objective. The proposed ML algorithm is validated with the datasets of an underwater optical communication system and is compared with competing ML algorithms. Performance results indicate that the proposal outperforms the competing algorithms for binary and multi-class configuration learning in underwater optical communication datasets. The proposed configuration learning framework can be further investigated and applied to a broad range of topics in signal processing and communications.

[1]  Lajos Hanzo,et al.  Thirty Years of Machine Learning: The Road to Pareto-Optimal Next-Generation Wireless Networks , 2019, ArXiv.

[2]  Ami Wiesel,et al.  Deep MIMO detection , 2017, 2017 IEEE 18th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC).

[3]  Davide Anguita,et al.  Optical wireless underwater communication for AUV: Preliminary simulation and experimental results , 2011, OCEANS 2011 IEEE - Spain.

[4]  Geoffrey Ye Li,et al.  Deep Learning-Based Channel Estimation for Beamspace mmWave Massive MIMO Systems , 2018, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[5]  Fumiyuki Adachi,et al.  Deep-Learning-Based Millimeter-Wave Massive MIMO for Hybrid Precoding , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[6]  Yuhan Dong,et al.  On capacity of 2-by-2 underwater wireless optical MIMO channels , 2015, 2015 Advances in Wireless and Optical Communications (RTUWO).

[7]  Sermsak Jaruwatanadilok,et al.  Underwater Wireless Optical Communication Channel Modeling and Performance Evaluation using Vector Radiative Transfer Theory , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[8]  Daniela Rus,et al.  An End-to-End Signal Strength Model for Underwater Optical Communications , 2013, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[9]  Jing Xu,et al.  Underwater Laser Communication Using an OFDM-Modulated 520-nm Laser Diode , 2016, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[10]  Feng Lyu,et al.  Intelligent Link Adaptation in 802.11 Vehicular Networks: Challenges and Solutions , 2019, IEEE Communications Standards Magazine.

[11]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Energy-efficient OFDM bandwidth selection for underwater acoustic carrier aggregation systems , 2016, 2016 IEEE Third Underwater Communications and Networking Conference (UComms).

[12]  Tommaso Melodia,et al.  Machine Learning for Wireless Communications in the Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Survey , 2019, Ad Hoc Networks.

[13]  Jakob Hoydis,et al.  An Introduction to Deep Learning for the Physical Layer , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking.

[14]  Guan Gui,et al.  Deep Learning for Super-Resolution Channel Estimation and DOA Estimation Based Massive MIMO System , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[15]  Syed Saad Azhar Ali,et al.  Massive MIMO systems for underwater acoustic communication , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Underwater System Technology: Theory and Applications (USYS).

[16]  Xiqi Gao,et al.  Machine Learning Based Link Adaptation Method for MIMO System , 2018, 2018 IEEE 29th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[17]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel , 2006, Underwater Networks.

[18]  Marco Lanzagorta Underwater Communications , 2012, Synthesis Lectures on Communications.

[19]  Yuhan Dong,et al.  Impulse response modeling for general underwater wireless optical MIMO links , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[20]  Hai-Han Lu,et al.  A 10m/10Gbps underwater wireless laser transmission system , 2017, 2017 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[21]  Mérouane Debbah,et al.  Massive MIMO in the UL/DL of Cellular Networks: How Many Antennas Do We Need? , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[22]  Shi Jin,et al.  Deep Learning for Massive MIMO CSI Feedback , 2017, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[23]  Jawad A. Salehi,et al.  Performance Studies of Underwater Wireless Optical Communication Systems With Spatial Diversity: MIMO Scheme , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[24]  Yuhan Dong,et al.  On Capacity of Downlink Underwater Wireless Optical MIMO Systems With Random Sea Surface , 2015, IEEE Communications Letters.

[25]  Victor C. M. Leung,et al.  Deep-Reinforcement-Learning-Based Optimization for Cache-Enabled Opportunistic Interference Alignment Wireless Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[26]  Patrick Robertson,et al.  Optimal and sub-optimal maximum a posteriori algorithms suitable for turbo decoding , 1997, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[27]  Andrea Goldsmith,et al.  Neural Network Detection of Data Sequences in Communication Systems , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[28]  Tao Jiang,et al.  Deep learning for wireless physical layer: Opportunities and challenges , 2017, China Communications.

[29]  Dario Pompili,et al.  AMMCA: Acoustic Massive MIMO with Carrier Aggregation to Boost the Underwater Communication Data Rate , 2015, WUWNet.

[30]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  ViterbiNet: Symbol Detection Using a Deep Learning Based Viterbi Algorithm , 2019, 2019 IEEE 20th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC).

[31]  Emrecan Demirors,et al.  SEANet G2: toward a high-data-rate software-defined underwater acoustic networking platform , 2016, WUWNet.

[32]  Pol Henarejos,et al.  Neural Network Aided Computation of Mutual Information for Adaptation of Spatial Modulation , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[33]  Hai-Han Lu,et al.  A 5 m/25 Gbps Underwater Wireless Optical Communication System , 2016, IEEE Photonics Journal.

[34]  Philip Lacovara,et al.  High-Bandwidth Underwater Communications , 2008 .

[35]  Yuhan Dong,et al.  Impulse Response Modeling for Underwater Wireless Optical Communication Links , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[36]  Xiaolin Hou,et al.  Interlaced pilot channel estimation in MIMO-OFDM systems , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[37]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Underwater Acoustic Carrier Aggregation: Achievable Rate and Energy-Efficiency Evaluation , 2017, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[38]  Geoffrey Ye Li,et al.  Power of Deep Learning for Channel Estimation and Signal Detection in OFDM Systems , 2017, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[39]  Georges Kaddoum,et al.  Underwater Optical Wireless Communication , 2016, IEEE Access.