Joint interpretation of hydrological and geophysical data: electrical resistivity tomography results from a process hydrological research site in the Black Forest Mountains, Germany

The use of electrical resistivity tomography (ERT; non-intrusive geophysical technique) was assessed to identify the hydrogeological conditions at a surface water/groundwater test site in the southern Black Forest, Germany. A total of 111 ERT transects were measured, which adopted electrode spacings from 0·5 to 5 m as well as using either Wenner or dipole-dipole electrode arrays. The resulting two-dimensional (2D) electrical resistivity distributions are related to the structure and water content of the subsurface. The images were interpreted with respect to previous classical hillslope hydrological investigations within the same research basin using both tracer methods and groundwater level observations. A raster-grid survey provided a quasi 3D resistivity pattern of the floodplain. Strong structural heterogeneity of the subsurface could be demonstrated, and (non)connectivities between surface and subsurface bodies were mapped. Through the spatial identification of likely flow pathways and source areas of runoff, the deep groundwater within the steeper valley slope seems to be much more connected to runoff generation processes within the valley floodplain than commonly credited in such environmental circumstances. Further, there appears to be no direct link between subsurface water-bodies adjacent to the stream channel. Deep groundwater sources are also able to contribute towards streamflow from exfiltration at the edge of the floodplain as well as through the saturated areas overlying the floodplain itself. Such exfiltrated water then moves towards the stream as channelized surface flow. These findings support previous tracer investigations which showed that groundwater largely dominates the storm hydrograph of the stream, but the source areas of this component were unclear without geophysical measurements. The work highlighted the importance of using information from previous, complementary hydrochemical and hydrometric research campaigns to better interpret the ERT measurements. On the other hand, the ERT can provide a better spatial understanding of existing hydrochemical and hydrometric data. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  L. Slater.  Near Surface Electrical Characterization of Hydraulic Conductivity: From Petrophysical Properties to Aquifer Geometries—A Review , 2007 .

[2]  S. Uhlenbrook,et al.  Hydrograph separations in a mesoscale mountainous basin at event and seasonal timescales , 2002 .

[3]  William E. Kelly,et al.  A hydrogeophysical model for relations between electrical and hydraulic properties of aquifers , 1985 .

[4]  T. Dahlin,et al.  A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays , 2004 .

[5]  S. Uhlenbrook,et al.  Experimental evidence of fast groundwater responses in a hillslope/floodplain area in the Black Forest Mountains, Germany , 2004 .

[6]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003–2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences , 2003 .

[7]  A. Binley,et al.  DC Resistivity and Induced Polarization Methods , 2005 .

[8]  Andrew Binley,et al.  Monitoring Unsaturated Flow and Transport Using Cross‐Borehole Geophysical Methods , 2008 .

[9]  S. Uhlenbrook,et al.  Hydrological process representation at the meso-scale: the potential of a distributed, conceptual catchment model , 2004 .

[10]  Rhett Herman.  An introduction to electrical resistivity in geophysics , 2001 .

[11]  W. Kelly,et al.  Relations Between Aquifer Electrical and Hydraulic Properties , 1985 .

[12]  M. Bonell,et al.  SELECTED CHALLENGES IN RUNOFF GENERATION RESEARCH IN FORESTS FROM THE HILLSLOPE TO HEADWATER DRAINAGE BASIN SCALE 1 , 1998 .

[13]  Andrew Binley,et al.  Relationship between spectral induced polarization and hydraulic properties of saturated and unsaturated sandstone , 2005 .

[14]  M. Hayashi,et al.  Integrated hydrogeological and geophysical study of depression‐focused groundwater recharge in the Canadian prairies , 2004 .

[15]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Imaging and characterisation of subsurface solute transport using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and equivalent transport models , 2002 .

[16]  Stefan Uhlenbrook,et al.  Source areas and mixing of runoff components at the hillslope scale—a multi-technical approach , 2008 .

[17]  Venkat Lakshmi,et al.  Advancing process‐based watershed hydrological research using near‐surface geophysics: a vision for, and review of, electrical and magnetic geophysical methods , 2008 .

[18]  Sri Niwas,et al.  Estimation of hydraulic parameters of shaly sandstone aquifers from geoelectrical measurements , 2000 .

[19]  Jochen Wenninger,et al.  Identification of runoff generation processes using combined hydrometric, tracer and geophysical methods in a headwater catchment in South Africa / Identification des processus de formation du débit en combinat la méthodes hydrométrique, traceur et géophysiques dans un bassin versant sud-africain , 2008 .

[20]  Alberto Villa,et al.  Calibration of a Vadose Zone Model Using Water Injection Monitored by GPR and Electrical Resistance Tomography , 2008 .

[21]  John J. Fisher,et al.  Electric-hydraulic conductivity correlation in fractured crystalline bedrock: Central Landfill, Rhode Island, USA , 1996 .

[22]  M. Bonell,et al.  High Rainfall, Response-Dominated Catchments: A Comparative Study of Experiments in Tropical Northeast Queensland with Temperate New Zealand , 1998 .

[23]  Y. Rubin,et al.  Hydrogeological parameter estimation using geophysical data: a review of selected techniques , 2000 .

[24]  S. Gorelick,et al.  Saline tracer visualized with three‐dimensional electrical resistivity tomography: Field‐scale spatial moment analysis , 2005 .

[25]  D. Huntley,et al.  Relations Between Permeability and Electrical Resistivity in Granular Aquifers , 1986 .

[26]  André Revil,et al.  Permeability of shaly sands , 1999 .

[27]  Keith Beven,et al.  Runoff Production and Flood Frequency in Catchments of Order n: An Alternative Approach , 1986 .

[28]  J. Hewlett,et al.  A REVIEW OF CATCHMENT EXPERIMENTS TO DETERMINE THE EFFECT OF VEGETATION CHANGES ON WATER YIELD AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION , 1982 .

[29]  R. Allan Freeze,et al.  Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff: 1. Base flow contributions to channel flow , 1972 .

[30]  Helmut Elsenbeer,et al.  Hydrometric and hydrochemicai evidence for fast flowpaths at La Cuenca, Western Amazonia , 1996 .

[31]  Joseph P. Fenwick,et al.  Geophysical investigations at the ancient royal site of Rathcroghan, County Roscommon, Ireland , 2005 .

[32]  G. E. Archie.  The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics , 1942 .