A fully automated and highly versatile system for testing multi-cognitive functions and recording neuronal activities in rodents.

We have developed a fully automated system for operant behavior testing and neuronal activity recording by which multiple cognitive brain functions can be investigated in a single task sequence. The unique feature of this system is a custom-made, acoustically transparent chamber that eliminates many of the issues associated with auditory cue control in most commercially available chambers. The ease with which operant devices can be added or replaced makes this system quite versatile, allowing for the implementation of a variety of auditory, visual, and olfactory behavioral tasks. Automation of the system allows fine temporal (10 ms) control and precise time-stamping of each event in a predesigned behavioral sequence. When combined with a multi-channel electrophysiology recording system, multiple cognitive brain functions, such as motivation, attention, decision-making, patience, and rewards, can be examined sequentially or independently.

[1]  Marco Atzori,et al.  Nicotinic modulation of auditory attentional shift in the rat , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[2]  Masanao Toda,et al.  Decision Process , 2019, CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering.

[3]  M. Shiflett,et al.  Cue-Elicited Reward-Seeking Requires Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Activation in the Nucleus Accumbens , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  J. Syka,et al.  Auditory frequency and intensity discrimination in pigmented rats , 1996, Hearing Research.

[5]  K O Johnson,et al.  Sensory discrimination: decision process. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  T. Sagvolden.  Impulsiveness, overactivity, and poorer sustained attention improve by chronic treatment with low doses of l-amphetamine in an animal model of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) , 2011, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[7]  George L. Gerstein,et al.  Auditory frequency discrimination in the white rat , 1998, Hearing Research.

[8]  André Ramos,et al.  Measuring anxiety- and locomotion-related behaviours in mice: a new way of using old tests , 2010, Psychopharmacology.

[9]  J. Ko.  Sensory discrimination: neural processes preceding discrimination decision. , 1980 .

[10]  R. Rennaker,et al.  Frequency discrimination in rats measured with tone-step stimuli and discrete pure tones , 2009, Hearing Research.

[11]  C. Duvauchelle,et al.  Auditory stimuli enhance MDMA-conditioned reward and MDMA-induced nucleus accumbens dopamine, serotonin and locomotor responses , 2008, Brain Research Bulletin.

[12]  Y. Niv,et al.  The effects of motivation on response rate: A hidden semi-Markov model analysis of behavioral dynamics , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  M. Leon,et al.  Conditioned tone control of brain reward behavior produces highly specific representational gain in the primary auditory cortex , 2009, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[14]  Weimin Zheng,et al.  Auditory map reorganization and pitch discrimination in adult rats chronically exposed to low-level ambient noise , 2012, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[15]  T. Sagvolden,et al.  Rat models of ADHD. , 2011, Current topics in behavioral neurosciences.

[16]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  Sensory discrimination: neural processes preceding discrimination decision. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  G. Gerstein,et al.  A signal detection analysis of auditory-frequency discrimination in the rat. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Norman M. Weinberger,et al.  Learning strategy trumps motivational level in determining learning-induced auditory cortical plasticity , 2010, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[19]  K. Shibuki,et al.  Sound sequence discrimination learning motivated by reward requires dopaminergic D2 receptor activation in the rat auditory cortex. , 2006, Learning & memory.