Prediction of Significant Prostate Cancer at Prostate Biopsy and Per Core Detection Rate of Targeted and Systematic Biopsies Using Real-Time Shear Wave Elastography

Introduction: Prostate cancer (PCa) detection is accompanied by overdiagnosis and mischaracterization of PCa. Therefore, new imaging modalities like shear wave elastography (SWE) are required. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate per-core detection rates (DRs) of targeted biopsies and systematic biopsies and to test if SWE findings can predict presence of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) at biopsy. Patients and Methods: Overall, 95 patients scheduled for prostate biopsy in our center underwent SWE. SWE findings were classified into suspicious or normal. Targeted biopsies were taken in up to 3 SWE-suspicious areas. csPCa was defined as the presence of Gleason pattern ≥4, level of prostate-specific antigen ≥10 ng/ml or >2 positive cores. Results: Overall DR for csPCa in our study cohort was 40%. Per-core DR for exclusively SWE-targeted cores versus systematic samples cores was 10.5 vs. 8.6% (p = 0.3). In the logistic regression models, individuals with suspicious SWE findings are at 6.4-fold higher risk of harboring csPCa (p = 0.03). Gain in predictive accuracy was 2.3% (0.82 vs. 0.84, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Presence of suspicious SWE findings is an independent predictor of csPCa. Therefore, SWE may be helpful in selecting patients for biopsy. Nonetheless, per-core DR for SWE-targeted cores was not statistically significant higher than DR of systematic sampled cores. Therefore, additional systematic biopsy is mandatory.

[1]  K. Pummer,et al.  Is There a Role for Active Surveillance in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer? , 2015, Urologia Internationalis.

[2]  L. Lönn,et al.  A comparative study of strain and shear-wave elastography in an elasticity phantom. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  P. Albers,et al.  Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen. , 2014, The Journal of urology.

[4]  N. Salem,et al.  Comparison of image-guided targeted biopsies versus systematic randomized biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic literature review of well-designed studies , 2014, World Journal of Urology.

[5]  J. Cho,et al.  Shear Wave Elastography for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Preliminary Study , 2014, Korean journal of radiology.

[6]  M. Colecchia,et al.  Detection Rate of Anterior Prostate Cancer in 226 Patients Submitted to Initial and Repeat Transperineal Biopsy , 2014, Urologia Internationalis.

[7]  Markus Graefen,et al.  Shear wave elastography for localization of prostate cancer lesions and assessment of elasticity thresholds: implications for targeted biopsies and active surveillance protocols. , 2014, The Journal of urology.

[8]  A. Haese*,et al.  Incremental detection rate of prostate cancer by real‐time elastography targeted biopsies in combination with a conventional 10‐core biopsy in 1024 consecutive patients , 2014, BJU international.

[9]  Werner Jaschke,et al.  Comparison of real-time elastography and multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: a whole-mount step-section analysis. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy. , 2013, European urology.

[11]  Heinz-Peter Schlemmer,et al.  Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[12]  O. Hélénon,et al.  Ultrasound elastography of the prostate: state of the art. , 2013, Diagnostic and interventional imaging.

[13]  Tomy Varghese,et al.  Transrectal quantitative shear wave elastography in the detection and characterisation of prostate cancer , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[14]  C. von Bodman,et al.  Comprehensive report on prostate cancer misclassification by 16 currently used low‐risk and active surveillance criteria , 2012, BJU international.

[15]  R. Memo,et al.  Shear Wave Ultrasound Elastography of the Prostate: Initial Results , 2012, Ultrasound quarterly.

[16]  D. Noh,et al.  Clinical application of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast diseases , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[17]  François Cornud,et al.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and localization of prostate cancer: combination of T2‐weighted, dynamic contrast‐enhanced and diffusion‐weighted imaging , 2011, BJU international.

[18]  B. G. Blijenberg,et al.  Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Nicolas Barry Delongchamps,et al.  Needle biopsies on autopsy prostates: sensitivity of cancer detection based on true prevalence. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  E. Elkin,et al.  Decision Curve Analysis: A Novel Method for Evaluating Prediction Models , 2006, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[21]  C. Roehrborn,et al.  Significant upgrading affects a third of men diagnosed with prostate cancer: predictive nomogram and internal validation , 2006, BJU international.

[22]  J. Epstein,et al.  Prostate cancer sampled on sextant needle biopsy: significance of cancer on multiple cores from different areas of the prostate. , 1999, Urology.

[23]  D. Gleason,et al.  PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA BY COMBINED HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND CLINICAL STAGING , 2017, The Journal of urology.

[24]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. , 2014, European urology.

[25]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Transition zone prostate cancer: detection and localization with 3-T multiparametric MR imaging. , 2013, Radiology.

[26]  S. Kaplan Re: Shear wave ultrasound elastography of the prostate: initial results. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[27]  J. McNeal The zonal anatomy of the prostate , 1981, The Prostate.