Value Capture for Transportation Finance

As vehicles become more fuel-efficient and overall levels of travel stagnate in response to increases in fuel prices, conventional sources of revenue for transportation finance such as taxes on motor fuels have been put under increasing pressure. One potential replacement as a source of revenue is a set of policies collectively referred to as value capture policies. In contrast to fuel taxes and other instruments that impose charges on users of transportation networks, value capture policies seek to generate revenue by extracting a portion of the gains in the value of land that result from improvements to transportation networks. In this paper we identify a set of eight policies that contain elements of the value capture approach. These policies include land value taxes, tax increment financing, special assessments, transportation utility fees, development impact fees, negotiated exactions, joint development, and air rights. We evaluate each of the policies according to four criteria: efficiency, equity, sustainability (in terms of revenue adequacy and stability), and feasibility. The value capture concept is placed within a more general framework of transportation finance that emphasizes the relationship between different types of charges and groups of beneficiaries from transportation investments.

[1]  D. Levinson Economic Development Impacts of High-Speed Rail , 2010 .

[2]  Arturo Bujanda,et al.  Financial Model to Assess Value Capture Potential of a Roadway Project , 2009 .

[3]  John M. Quigley,et al.  Political and Public Acceptability of Congestion Pricing: Ideology and Self Interest , 2009 .

[4]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  The Impact of Railway Stations on Residential and Commercial Property Value: A Meta-analysis , 2003 .

[5]  Corinne Mulley,et al.  The short-term land value impacts of urban rail transit: Quantitative evidence from Sunderland, UK , 2007 .

[6]  Jeffery J. Smith,et al.  Financing Transit Systems through Value Capture: An Annotated Bibliography , 2006 .

[7]  F. Foldvary,et al.  Geo-Rent: A Plea to Public Economists , 2005 .

[8]  William Vickrey,et al.  Site Value Taxes and the Optimal Pricing of Public Services , 2001 .

[9]  H. Batt Value Capture as a Policy Tool in Transportation Economics: An Exploration in Public Finance in the Tradition of Henry George , 2001 .

[10]  R. Dye,et al.  The Effects of Tax Increment Financing on Economic Development , 2000 .

[11]  Sherry Ryan,et al.  Property Values and Transportation Facilities: Finding the Transportation-Land Use Connection , 1999 .

[12]  J. Yinger THE INCIDENCE OF DEVELOPMENT FEES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS , 1998, National Tax Journal.

[13]  M. Dalvi Financing a metro rail through private sector initiative: The Mumbai Metro , 1998 .

[14]  F. Olson,et al.  The Future of Impact Fees In Minnesota , 1998 .

[15]  D. Levinson The Limits to Growth Management: Development Regulation in Montgomery County, Maryland , 1997 .

[16]  Alanna Hartzok Pennsylvania's Success with Local Property Tax Reform: The Split Rate Tax , 1997 .

[17]  Hong-wei Huang,et al.  The Land-Use Impacts of Urban Rail Transit Systems , 1996 .

[18]  Arthur Christian Nelson,et al.  Growth management principles and practices , 1995 .

[19]  R. Cervero Rail Transit and Joint Development: Land Market Impacts in Washington, D.C. and Atlanta , 1994 .

[20]  P. Stopher Financing urban rail projects: The case of Los Angeles , 1993 .

[21]  Reid Ewing TRANSPORTATION UTILITY FEES , 1993 .

[22]  W. Fischel,et al.  Regulation for Revenue: The Political Economy of Land Use Exactions , 1993 .

[23]  T. Stinson Subsidizing Local Economic Development Through Tax Increment Financing , 1992 .

[24]  Yoshitsugu Hayashi,et al.  Issues in financing urban rail transit projects and value captures , 1989 .

[25]  Michael A. Stegman,et al.  Who bears the burden of development impact fees? ( USA) , 1988 .

[26]  W. Allen VALUE CAPTURE IN TRANSIT , 1987 .

[27]  S. Hanson,et al.  The Geography Of Urban Transportation , 1986 .

[28]  H. George Progress and poverty , 1879 .