Transfer entropy in continuous time, with applications to jump and neural spiking processes

Transfer entropy has been used to quantify the directed flow of information between source and target variables in many complex systems. While transfer entropy was originally formulated in discrete time, in this paper we provide a framework for considering transfer entropy in continuous time systems, based on Radon-Nikodym derivatives between measures of complete path realizations. To describe the information dynamics of individual path realizations, we introduce the pathwise transfer entropy, the expectation of which is the transfer entropy accumulated over a finite time interval. We demonstrate that this formalism permits an instantaneous transfer entropy rate. These properties are analogous to the behavior of physical quantities defined along paths such as work and heat. We use this approach to produce an explicit form for the transfer entropy for pure jump processes, and highlight the simplified form in the specific case of point processes (frequently used in neuroscience to model neural spike trains). Finally, we present two synthetic spiking neuron model examples to exhibit the pertinent features of our formalism, namely, that the information flow for point processes consists of discontinuous jump contributions (at spikes in the target) interrupting a continuously varying contribution (relating to waiting times between target spikes). Numerical schemes based on our formalism promise significant benefits over existing strategies based on discrete time formalisms.

[1]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[2]  M. V. Rossum,et al.  In Neural Computation , 2022 .

[3]  O. Bagasra,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 1914, Science.

[4]  A. Bangham Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 14. , 1965 .

[5]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Brain Connectivity , 2011, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[6]  R. Bogacz,et al.  Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology , 2010 .

[7]  Ulrike Goldschmidt,et al.  An Introduction To The Theory Of Point Processes , 2016 .

[8]  Tutut Herawan,et al.  Computational and mathematical methods in medicine. , 2006, Computational and mathematical methods in medicine.

[9]  Nobuyasu Ito,et al.  Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Modeling and Simulation, plus Econophysics Colloquium 2014 , 2015 .

[10]  BMC Bioinformatics , 2005 .

[11]  Hendrik B. Geyer,et al.  Journal of Physics A - Mathematical and General, Special Issue. SI Aug 11 2006 ?? Preface , 2006 .

[12]  Rainer Klages,et al.  Nonequilibrium statistical physics of small systems : fluctuation relations and beyond , 2013 .

[13]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[14]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  Detectability of Granger causality for subsampled continuous-time neurophysiological processes , 2016, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  Joseph T. Lizier,et al.  An Introduction to Transfer Entropy: Information Flow in Complex Systems , 2016 .

[16]  J. Herskowitz,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA , 1996, Current Biology.

[17]  R. Bass,et al.  Review: P. Billingsley, Convergence of probability measures , 1971 .

[18]  October I Physical Review Letters , 2022 .

[19]  J. Rogers Chaos , 1876 .

[20]  J. Norris Appendix: probability and measure , 1997 .

[21]  Pamela F. Jones,et al.  Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine , 2011, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[22]  Olivier J. J. Michel,et al.  Relating Granger causality to directed information theory for networks of stochastic processes , 2009, 0911.2873.

[23]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[24]  46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, CDC 2007, New Orleans, LA, USA, December 12-14, 2007 , 2007, CDC.

[25]  H E M Journal of Neurophysiology , 1938, Nature.

[26]  BMC Neuroscience , 2003 .