Behavioral Decisions and Welfare (Replaces CentER DP 2010-22)

If decision-makers (DMs) do not always do what is in their best interest, what do choices reveal about welfare? This paper shows how observed choices can reveal whether the DM is acting in her own best interest. We study a framework that relaxes rationality in a way that is common across a variety of seemingly disconnected positive behavioral models and admits the standard rational choice model as a special case. We model a behavioral DM (boundedly rational) who, in contrast to a standard DM (rational), does not fully internalize all the consequences of her own actions on herself. We provide an axiomatic characterization of choice correspondences consistent with behavioral and standard DMs, propose a choice experiment to infer the divergence between choice and welfare, state an existence result for incomplete preferences and show that the choices of behavioral DMs are, typically, sub-optimal.

[1]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Monotone Comparative Statics , 1994 .

[2]  Sayantan Ghosal,et al.  Decisions with endogenous frames , 2010, Soc. Choice Welf..

[3]  P. Dalton,et al.  Decisions with Endogenous Frames (Replaces CentER DP 2010-21) , 2010 .

[4]  Jonathan Shalev,et al.  Loss aversion equilibrium , 2000, Int. J. Game Theory.

[5]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[6]  B. Kőszegi.  Utility from anticipation and personal equilibrium , 2010 .

[7]  B. Douglas Bernheim.  BEHAVIORAL WELFARE ECONOMICS , 2009 .

[8]  P. Hammond.  Endogenous tastes and stable long-run choice , 1976 .

[9]  R. Thaler,et al.  Libertarian Paternalism is Not an Oxymoron , 2003 .

[10]  Robert Sugden,et al.  The Opportunity Criterion: Consumer Sovereignty Without the Assumption of Coherent Preferences , 2004 .

[11]  Yusufcan Masatlioglu,et al.  Rational choice with status quo bias , 2005, J. Econ. Theory.

[12]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Back to Bentham? Explorations of experience utility , 1997 .

[13]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Projection Bias in Predicting Future Utility , 2000 .

[14]  T. Bergstrom.  Maximal elements of Acyclic Relations on Compact Sets , 1975 .

[15]  George Loewenstein,et al.  Hedonic adaptation and the role of decision and experience utility in public policy , 2008 .

[16]  M. Rabin,et al.  A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences , 2006 .

[17]  Michael Mandler,et al.  Incomplete preferences and rational intransitivity of choice , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[18]  J. Geanakoplos,et al.  Psychological games and sequential rationality , 1989 .

[19]  Sayantan Ghosal,et al.  Poverty and Aspirations Failure , 2011 .

[20]  Paola Manzini,et al.  Sequentially Rationalizable Choice , 2007 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[22]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  The Economic Consequences of Cognitive Dissonance , 1982 .

[23]  Hugo Sonnenschein,et al.  Equilibrium in abstract economies without ordered preferences , 1975 .

[24]  A. Sen,et al.  Choice Functions and Revealed Preference , 1971 .