The Committee on Climate Change : A Policy Analysis

Domestic action on climate change is increasingly important in the light of the difficulties with international agreements and requires a combination of solutions, in terms of institutions and policy instruments. One way of achieving government carbon policy goals may be the creation of an independent body to advise, set or monitor policy. This paper critically assesses the Committee on Climate Change (CCC), which was created in 2008 as an independent body to help move the UK towards a low carbon economy. We look at the motivation for its creation in terms of: information provision, advice, monitoring, or policy delegation. In particular we consider its ability to overcome a time inconsistency problem by comparing and contrasting it with another independent body, the Monetary Policy Committee of the Bank of England. In practice the Committee on Climate Change appears to be the ‘inverse’ of the Monetary Policy Committee, in that it advises on what the policy goal should be rather than being responsible for achieving it. The CCC incorporates both advisory and monitoring functions to inform government and achieve a credible carbon policy over a long time frame. This is a similar framework to that adopted by Stern (2006), but the CCC operates on a continuing basis. We therefore believe the CCC is best viewed as a “Rolling Stern plus” body. There are also concerns as to how binding the budgets actually are and how the budgets interact with other energy policy goals and instruments, such as Renewable Obligation Contracts and the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. The CCC could potentially be reformed to include: an explicit information provision role; consumption-based accounting of emissions and control of a policy instrument such as a balanced-budget carbon tax.

[1]  Ekko C. van Ierland,et al.  Stability of Climate Coalitions in a Cartel Formation Game , 2003 .

[2]  D. Helm EU Climate-change Policy—A Critique , 2009 .

[3]  C. Walsh Optimal contracts for central bankers , 1995 .

[4]  Shimon Awerbuch,et al.  Investing in photovoltaics: risk, accounting and the value of new technology , 2000 .

[5]  Poul Erik Morthorst,et al.  The development of a green certificate market , 2000 .

[6]  Dieter Helm The new energy paradigm , 2007 .

[7]  W. Pizer,et al.  Regulating Stock Externalities Under Uncertainty , 2000 .

[8]  Cameron Hepburn,et al.  Credible Carbon Policy , 2003 .

[9]  Kenneth Rogoff,et al.  The Optimal Degree of Commitment to an Intermediate Monetary Target''Quarterly Journal of Economics , 1985 .

[10]  N. Stern The Global Deal: Climate Change and the Creation of a New Era of Progress and Prosperity , 2009 .

[11]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Carbon trading in the policy mix , 2003 .

[12]  N. Stern The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[13]  Eric Maskin,et al.  The Politician and the Judge: Accountability in Government , 2004 .

[14]  M. Lenzen,et al.  Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities — Part 1: A technical note on combining input–output and ecological footprint analysis , 2007 .

[15]  Robert N. Stavins,et al.  Increasing Participation and Compliance in International Climate Change Agreements , 2002 .

[16]  David J. C. MacKay Sustainable Energy - Without the Hot Air , 2008 .

[17]  Michael Grubb,et al.  Allocation and competitiveness in the EU emissions trading scheme: policy overview , 2006 .

[18]  Peter McGregor,et al.  A distinctive energy policy for Scotland , 2008 .

[19]  M. Weitzman A Review of The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change , 2007 .

[20]  Steve Sorrell,et al.  The evolution of emissions trading in the EU: tensions between national trading schemes and the proposed EU directive , 2003 .

[21]  Warwick J. McKibbin,et al.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 16, Number 2—Spring 2002—Pages 107–129 The Role of Economics in Climate Change Policy , 2022 .

[22]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities — Part 2: Review of input–output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade , 2007 .

[23]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change , 2007 .

[24]  Finn E. Kydland,et al.  Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans , 1977, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  David Pearce,et al.  The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming , 1991 .

[26]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  Too good to be true , 1999, Nature.

[27]  K. Turner,et al.  The CO2 'trade balance' between Scotland and the rest of the UK: Performing a multi-region environmental input-output analysis with limited data , 2008 .

[28]  R. Barro,et al.  Rules, Discretion and Reputation in a Model of Monetary Policy , 1983 .