The Effectiveness of an Interactive 3-Dimensional Computer Graphics Model for Medical Education

Background Medical students often have difficulty achieving a conceptual understanding of 3-dimensional (3D) anatomy, such as bone alignment, muscles, and complex movements, from 2-dimensional (2D) images. To this end, animated and interactive 3-dimensional computer graphics (3DCG) can provide better visual information to users. In medical fields, research on the advantages of 3DCG in medical education is relatively new. Objective To determine the educational effectiveness of interactive 3DCG. Methods We divided 100 participants (27 men, mean (SD) age 17.9 (0.6) years, and 73 women, mean (SD) age 18.1 (1.1) years) from the Health Sciences University of Mongolia (HSUM) into 3DCG (n = 50) and textbook-only (control) (n = 50) groups. The control group used a textbook and 2D images, while the 3DCG group was trained to use the interactive 3DCG shoulder model in addition to a textbook. We conducted a questionnaire survey via an encrypted satellite network between HSUM and Tokushima University. The questionnaire was scored on a 5-point Likert scale from strongly disagree (score 1) to strongly agree (score 5). Results Interactive 3DCG was effective in undergraduate medical education. Specifically, there was a significant difference in mean (SD) scores between the 3DCG and control groups in their response to questionnaire items regarding content (4.26 (0.69) vs 3.85 (0.68), P = .001) and teaching methods (4.33 (0.65) vs 3.74 (0.79), P < .001), but no significant difference in the Web category. Participants also provided meaningful comments on the advantages of interactive 3DCG. Conclusions Interactive 3DCG materials have positive effects on medical education when properly integrated into conventional education. In particular, our results suggest that interactive 3DCG is more efficient than textbooks alone in medical education and can motivate students to understand complex anatomical structures.

[1]  Kevin W Eva,et al.  Is There Any Real Virtue of Virtual Reality?: The Minor Role of Multiple Orientations in Learning Anatomy from Computers , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[2]  Gazi Mahabubul Alam,et al.  Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of 2 and 3D visualizations in students' understanding of structures of organic molecules , 2010 .

[3]  Agnetha Broos,et al.  Gender and Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Anxiety: Male Self-Assurance and Female Hesitation , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[4]  D. Patten,et al.  Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present and future , 2006, Medical education.

[5]  A. Khurana,et al.  The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization , 2010, Anatomical sciences education.

[6]  Chorng-Shyong Ong,et al.  Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Wilfried Brauer,et al.  Spatial Cognition III , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[8]  B. Turney,et al.  Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. , 2007, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[9]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. , 2001 .

[10]  T. Nakajima,et al.  Three-Dimensional Computer Graphics for Surgical Procedure Learning: Web Three-Dimensional Application for Cleft Lip Repair , 2006, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[11]  G. Norman,et al.  Virtual reality and brain anatomy: a randomised trial of e‐learning instructional designs , 2007, Medical education.

[12]  J. Collins,et al.  Modern approaches to teaching and learning anatomy , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  Yining Wang,et al.  Effects of dental 3D multimedia system on the performance of junior dental students in preclinical practice: a report from China , 2009, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[14]  W. Pawlina,et al.  Medical education in the anatomical sciences: The winds of change continue to blow , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[15]  Örjan Smedby,et al.  Advanced 3D visualization in student-centred medical education , 2008, Medical teacher.

[16]  Lynna J. Ausburn.  Gender and Learning Strategy Differences in Nontraditional Adult Students' Design Preferences in Hybrid Distance Courses , 2004 .

[17]  G. Eysenbach.  Medicine 2.0: Social Networking, Collaboration, Participation, Apomediation, and Openness , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.

[18]  A. Ladd,et al.  Evaluation of a surgical simulator for learning clinical anatomy , 2004, Medical education.

[19]  James F. Brinkley,et al.  Knowledge-Based, Interactive, Custom Anatomical Scene Creation for Medical Education: The Biolucida System , 2005, AMIA.

[20]  Thomas Huk,et al.  Who benefits from learning with 3D models? the case of spatial ability , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[21]  S. Marks,et al.  The role of three‐dimensional information in health care and medical education: The implications for anatomy and dissection , 2000, Clinical anatomy.

[22]  Технология.  Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency , 2013 .

[23]  Francis M. Dwyer,et al.  The effect of static and animated visualization: a perspective of instructional effectiveness and efficiency , 2010 .

[24]  W. Cottam,et al.  Adequacy of medical school gross anatomy education as perceived by certain postgraduate residency programs and anatomy course directors , 1999, Clinical anatomy.

[25]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Anatomy Learning with Virtual Objects , 2010, AAAI Spring Symposium: Cognitive Shape Processing.

[26]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[27]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[28]  O Findl,et al.  Advantage of three dimensional animated teaching over traditional surgical videos for teaching ophthalmic surgery: a randomised study , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[29]  J. McLachlan,et al.  Teaching anatomy without cadavers , 2004, Medical education.

[30]  G. Norman,et al.  How medical students learn spatial anatomy , 2001, The Lancet.

[31]  Kevin Fung,et al.  Three-dimensional educational computer model of the larynx: voicing a new direction. , 2009, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.