Multi-Modal Multi-Task Learning for Joint Prediction of Clinical Scores in Alzheimer's Disease

One recent interest in computer-aided diagnosis of neurological diseases is to predict the clinical scores from brain images. Most existing methods usually estimate multiple clinical variables separately, without considering the useful correlation information among them. On the other hand, nearly all methods use only one modality of data (mostly structural MRI) for regression, and thus ignore the complementary information among different modalities. To address these issues, in this paper, we present a general methodology, namely Multi-Modal Multi-Task (M3T) learning, to jointly predict multiple variables from multi-modal data. Our method contains three major subsequent steps: (1) a multi-task feature selection which selects the common subset of relevant features for the related multiple clinical variables from each modality; (2) a kernel-based multimodal data fusion which fuses the above-selected features from all modalities; (3) a support vector regression which predicts multiple clinical variables based on the previously learnt mixed kernel. Experimental results on ADNI dataset with both imaging modalities (MRI and PET) and biological modality (CSF) validate the efficacy of the proposed M3T learning method.

[1]  Jieping Ye,et al.  Multi-Task Feature Learning Via Efficient l2, 1-Norm Minimization , 2009, UAI.

[2]  C. Jack,et al.  MRI and CSF biomarkers in normal, MCI, and AD subjects , 2009, Neurology.

[3]  Shuiwang Ji,et al.  SLEP: Sparse Learning with Efficient Projections , 2011 .

[4]  Vikas Singh,et al.  MKL for Robust Multi-modality AD Classification , 2009, MICCAI.

[5]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[6]  A. Dale,et al.  Multi-modal imaging predicts memory performance in normal aging and cognitive decline , 2010, Neurobiology of Aging.

[7]  Ying Wang,et al.  High-dimensional Pattern Regression Using Machine Learning: from Medical Images to Continuous Clinical Variables However, Support Vector Regression Has Some Disadvantages That Become Especially , 2022 .

[8]  Clifford R. Jack,et al.  Predicting Clinical Scores from Magnetic Resonance Scans in Alzheimer's Disease , 2010, NeuroImage.

[9]  Jing Li,et al.  Heterogeneous data fusion for alzheimer's disease study , 2008, KDD.

[10]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Joint estimation of multiple clinical variables of neurological diseases from imaging patterns , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[11]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Multi-task feature selection , 2006 .

[12]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Automatic classification of MR scans in Alzheimer's disease. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[14]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2005, 8th International Conference, Palm Springs, CA, USA, October 26-29, 2005, Proceedings, Part II , 2005, MICCAI.

[15]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[16]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[17]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Predicting Clinical Variable from MRI Features: Application to MMSE in MCI , 2005, MICCAI.

[18]  Eric P. Xing,et al.  Heterogeneous multitask learning with joint sparsity constraints , 2009, NIPS.