The task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax information

Binocular disparity and motion parallax are powerful cues to the relative depth between objects. However to recover absolute depth, either additional scaling parameters are required to calibrate the information provided by each cue, or it can be recovered through the combination of information from both cues (Richards, W. (1985). Structure from stereo and motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 2, 343-349). However, not all tasks necessarily require a full specification of the absolute depth structure of a scene and so psychophysical performance may vary depending on the amount of information available, and the degree to which absolute depth structure is required. The experiments reported here used three different tasks that varied in the type of geometric information required in order for them to be completed successfully. These included a depth nulling task, a depth-matching task, and an absolute depth judgement (shape) task. Real world stimuli were viewed (i) monocularly with head movements, (ii) binocularly and static, or (iii) binocularly with head movements. No effect of viewing condition was found whereas there was a large effect of task. Performance was accurate on the matching and nulling tasks and much less accurate on the shape task. The fact that the same perceptual distortions were not evident in all tasks suggests that the visual system can switch strategy according to the demands of the particular task. No evidence was found to suggest that the visual system could exploit the simultaneous presence of disparity and motion parallax.

[1]  J T Todd,et al.  The perceptual analysis of structure from motion for rotating objects undergoing affine stretching transformations , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  M. Landy,et al.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion , 1995, Vision Research.

[3]  J T Todd,et al.  The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Mark F. Bradshaw,et al.  Sensitivity to horizontal and vertical corrugations defined by binocular disparity , 1999, Vision Research.

[5]  B Rogers,et al.  Motion Parallax as an Independent Cue for Depth Perception , 1979, Perception.

[6]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  M. Braunstein,et al.  Recovering three-dimensional shape from perspective translations and orthographic rotations. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  M. Landy,et al.  Interaction between the perceived shape of two objects , 1999, Vision Research.

[9]  Andrew Blake,et al.  Two-dimensional constraints on three-dimensional structure from motion tasks , 1995, Vision Research.

[10]  A. GLENNERSTER,et al.  Stereoscopic Depth Constancy Depends on the Subject's Task , 1996, Vision Research.

[11]  B. Rogers,et al.  The effect of display size on disparity scaling from differential perspective and vergence cues , 1996, Vision Research.

[12]  W Richards,et al.  Correlation between Stereo Ability and the Recovery of Structure‐from‐Motion , 1985, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[13]  D D Hoffman,et al.  Inferring Structure from Motion in Two-View and Multiview Displays , 1993, Perception.

[14]  W Richards,et al.  Structure from stereo and motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  J S Tittle,et al.  The visual perception of three-dimensional length. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  B. Rogers,et al.  The Interaction of Binocular Disparity and Motion Parallax in the Computation of Depth , 1996, Vision Research.

[17]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Integration of stereopsis and motion shape cues , 1994, Vision Research.

[18]  J P Frisby,et al.  The Recovery of Structure from Motion: No Evidence for a Special Link with the Convergent Disparity Mechanism , 1987, Perception.

[19]  T S Collett,et al.  The Interaction of Oculomotor Cues and Stimulus Size in Stereoscopic Depth Constancy , 1991, Perception.

[20]  M. Hogervorst,et al.  Biases in three–dimensional structure–from–motion arise from noise in the early visual system , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  J. M. Foley Binocular distance perception. , 1980, Psychological review.

[22]  Ueber den Muskelsinn , 1889 .

[23]  M F Bradshaw,et al.  Disparity Scaling and the Perception of Frontoparallel Surfaces , 1995, Perception.

[24]  C. H. Graham,et al.  Factors influencing thresholds for monocular movement parallax. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  J. Todd,et al.  Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  S. Ullman,et al.  The interpretation of visual motion , 1977 .

[27]  D Buckley,et al.  Evidence for Good Recovery of Lengths of Real Objects Seen with Natural Stereo Viewing , 1996, Perception.

[28]  J. Pokorny Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1972 .

[29]  M F Bradshaw,et al.  Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis , 1993, Nature.

[30]  J T Todd,et al.  The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  J T Todd,et al.  Distortions of Three-Dimensional Space in the Perceptual Analysis of Motion and Stereo , 1995, Perception.

[32]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Affine structure from motion. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[33]  D R Proffitt,et al.  Comparing depth from motion with depth from binocular disparity. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  E. Johnston Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis , 1991, Vision Research.

[35]  J. Porrill,et al.  Stereopsis, vertical disparity and relief transformations , 1995, Vision Research.

[36]  B. Rogers,et al.  Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception , 1982, Vision Research.