Evaluation of upper extremity robot-assistances in subacute and chronic stroke subjects

BackgroundRobotic systems are becoming increasingly common in upper extremity stroke rehabilitation. Recent studies have already shown that the use of rehabilitation robots can improve recovery. This paper evaluates the effect of different modes of robot-assistances in a complex virtual environment on the subjects' ability to complete the task as well as on various haptic parameters arising from the human-robot interaction.MethodsThe MIMICS multimodal system that includes the haptic robot HapticMaster and a dynamic virtual environment is used. The goal of the task is to catch a ball that rolls down a sloped table and place it in a basket above the table. Our study examines the influence of catching assistance, pick-and-place movement assistance and grasping assistance on the catching efficiency, placing efficiency and on movement-dependant parameters: mean reaching forces, deviation error, mechanical work and correlation between the grasping force and the load force.ResultsThe results with groups of subjects (23 subacute hemiparetic subjects, 10 chronic hemiparetic subjects and 23 control subjects) showed that the assistance raises the catching efficiency and pick-and-place efficiency. The pick-and-place movement assistance greatly limits the movements of the subject and results in decreased work toward the basket. The correlation between the load force and the grasping force exists in a certain phase of the movement. The results also showed that the stroke subjects without assistance and the control subjects performed similarly.ConclusionsThe robot-assistances used in the study were found to be a possible way to raise the catching efficiency and efficiency of the pick-and-place movements in subacute and chronic subjects. The observed movement parameters showed that robot-assistances we used for our virtual task should be improved to maximize physical activity.

[1]  D. Nowak,et al.  Preserved and impaired aspects of predictive grip force control in cerebellar patients , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  Ian M Franks,et al.  Enhancement of motor rehabilitation through the use of information technologies. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[4]  M. Munih,et al.  Psychophysiological Responses to Robotic Rehabilitation Tasks in Stroke , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Maura Casadio,et al.  A Haptic Robot Reveals the Adaptation Capability of Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis , 2007, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[7]  William S. Harwin,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities for Robot-Mediated Neurorehabilitation , 2006, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  E.J. Perreault,et al.  An Assessment of Robot-Assisted Bimanual Movements on Upper Limb Motor Coordination Following Stroke , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  C.G. Burgar,et al.  Evidence for improved muscle activation patterns after retraining of reaching movements with the MIME robotic system in subjects with post-stroke hemiparesis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: Follow-up results. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2009, Circulation.

[13]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Coupling of grip force and load force during arm movements with grasped objects , 1993, Neuroscience Letters.

[14]  W. Rymer,et al.  Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  N. Hogan,et al.  A paradigm shift for rehabilitation robotics , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[16]  P. Morasso,et al.  Self-adaptive robot training of stroke survivors for continuous tracking movements , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[17]  Marko Munih,et al.  Pick to place trajectories in human arm training environment. , 2009, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[18]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  MIT-MANUS: a workstation for manual therapy and training. I , 1992, [1992] Proceedings IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication.

[19]  Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Robot-assisted adaptive training: custom force fields for teaching movement patterns , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  M. Johnson,et al.  Quantifying kinematics of purposeful movements to real, imagined, or absent functional objects: Implications for modelling trajectories for robot-assisted ADL tasks** , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[21]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: Does it matter what the robot does? , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[22]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years , 1999, Neurology.

[23]  Marko Munih,et al.  Robot-assisted evaluation of coordination between grasp and load forces in a power grasp in humans , 2006, Adv. Robotics.

[24]  Michelle J Johnson,et al.  Recent trends in robot-assisted therapy environments to improve real-life functional performance after stroke , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.