Ambient-cured geopolymer concrete with single alkali activator

Abstract In order to reduce the carbon emissions of concrete production and meet sustainability requirements, a new binding material to replace Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) is needed. This study focuses on experimental work to produce and evaluate a sustainable geopolymer concrete using a new approach. Only one activating solution was used instead of the typically two activators to prepare the geopolymer concrete mixes cured at ambient condition. Fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) and silica fume were used to produce different concrete mixes that were evaluated for mechanical properties, microstructural performance, and environmental impact. The geopolymer concrete with 100% replacement of cement by GGBS achieved a 36 MPa compressive strength at 28 days without heat curing of the specimens. The tensile strength of the new geopolymer increased by 12% compared to normal concrete. Results also showed that geopolymer concrete has the potential to decrease carbon emissions footprint by more than 60%.

[1]  N. Neithalath,et al.  Structure and strength of NaOH activated concretes containing fly ash or GGBFS as the sole binder , 2010 .

[2]  Anilesh Kumar,et al.  Durability and Mechanical Behavior of Fly Ash-GGBFS Geopolymer Concrete Utilizing Bottom Ash as Fine Aggregate , 2019, Transactions of the Indian Ceramic Society.

[3]  C. Poon,et al.  Compressive strength and microstructural properties of dry-mixed geopolymer pastes synthesized from GGBS and sewage sludge ash , 2018, Construction and Building Materials.

[4]  Prabir Sarker,et al.  Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition , 2014 .

[5]  Manojkumar V. Chitawadagi,et al.  Effect Of Curing Temperature And Curing Hours On The Properties Of GeoPolymer Concrete , 2014 .

[6]  Namshik Ahn,et al.  Theoretical and experimental study on mechanical properties and flexural strength of fly ash-geopolymer concrete , 2016 .

[7]  Sujeeva Setunge,et al.  Comparison of long term performance between alkali activated slag and fly ash geopolymer concretes , 2017 .

[8]  Abd Elmoaty M. Abd Elmoaty,et al.  Setting time and 7-day strength of geopolymer mortar with various binders , 2018, Construction and Building Materials.

[9]  F. Collins,et al.  Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: A comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete , 2013 .

[10]  T. Proske,et al.  Eco-friendly concretes with reduced water and cement contents — Mix design principles and laboratory tests , 2013 .

[11]  Bing Chen,et al.  Fresh and hardened properties of one-part fly ash-based geopolymer binders cured at room temperature: Effect of slag and alkali activators , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[12]  Prinya Chindaprasirt,et al.  Setting Time, Strength, and Bond of High-Calcium Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete , 2015 .

[13]  Togay Ozbakkaloglu,et al.  Behavior of low-calcium fly and bottom ash-based geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature , 2015 .

[14]  Vineet Shah,et al.  ALKALI Activated FLY-ASH Based Geopolymer Concrete , 2013 .

[15]  Erez N. Allouche,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete , 2011 .

[16]  Kefiyalew Zerfu,et al.  Review on Alkali-Activated Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete , 2016 .

[17]  Hao Wang,et al.  Geopolymer foam concrete: An emerging material for sustainable construction , 2014 .

[18]  W. Sha,et al.  Effects of slag substitution on physical and mechanical properties of fly ash-based alkali activated binders (AABs) , 2019, Cement and Concrete Research.

[19]  M. Ghazy,et al.  Performance of Portland cement mixes containing silica fume and mixed with lime-water , 2014 .

[20]  Abdullah Zawawi Awang,et al.  Structural and material performance of geopolymer concrete: A review , 2018, Construction and Building Materials.

[21]  Marios Soutsos,et al.  Alkali activated slag concretes designed for a desired slump, strength and chloride diffusivity , 2018, Construction and Building Materials.

[22]  Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri Abdullah,et al.  Mechanical properties and microstructure analysis of FA-GGBS-HMNS based geopolymer concrete , 2019, Construction and Building Materials.

[23]  F. Aslani.  Thermal Performance Modeling of Geopolymer Concrete , 2016 .

[24]  Nakshatra B. Singh,et al.  Effect of silica fume on the mechanical properties of fly ash based-geopolymer concrete , 2016 .

[25]  Kwang-Myong Lee,et al.  Effect of Na2O content, SiO2/Na2O molar ratio, and curing conditions on the compressive strength of FA-based geopolymer , 2017 .

[26]  Dibyendu Adak,et al.  Structural performance of nano-silica modified fly-ash based geopolymer concrete , 2017 .

[27]  Jiong Hu,et al.  Effect of slag, silica fume, and metakaolin on properties and performance of alkali-activated fly ash cured at ambient temperature , 2019, Construction and Building Materials.

[28]  Mohamed Elchalakani,et al.  Sustainable concrete with high volume GGBFS to build Masdar City in the UAE , 2014 .

[29]  J. Sanjayan,et al.  Green house gas emissions due to concrete manufacture , 2007 .

[30]  Sui Pheng Low,et al.  Lean and Cleaner Production , 2013 .