Measuring patent similarity by comparing inventions functional trees

The estimation of the conceptual distance between patents is a critical issue for Computer-Aided patent portfolio analysis systems, an emerging class of computer tools for supporting R&D analyses and decisions, patent infringement risk evaluation, technology forecasting. The aim of the present work is the introduction of an original algorithm for patent comparison: since typical text analyses are biased by the writer’s style, the inventions similarity is here estimated by comparing the components and their hierarchical and functional interactions automatically extracted by means of a custom software tool. The whole procedure is clarified with an exemplary application in the field of electric current circuit breakers.

[1]  Vladimir I. Levenshtein,et al.  Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals , 1965 .

[2]  Hector Garcia-Molina,et al.  Detecting Digital Copyright Violations On The Internet , 1999 .

[3]  Daniel P. Lopresti.  Comparison of text-based methods for detecting duplication in document image databases , 1999, Electronic Imaging.

[4]  Paul Clough,et al.  Plagiarism in natural and programming languages: an overview of current tools and technologies , 2000 .

[5]  James A. Malcolm,et al.  ARE WE READY FOR LARGE SCALE USE OF PLAGIARISM DETECTION TOOLS , 2003 .

[6]  Daniel Shawcross Wilkerson,et al.  Winnowing: local algorithms for document fingerprinting , 2003, SIGMOD '03.

[7]  Paolo Tiberio,et al.  Un Metodo per il Riconoscimento di Duplicati in Collezioni di Documenti , 2003, SEBD.

[8]  Byungun Yoon,et al.  A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend , 2004 .

[9]  Gaetano Cascini.  TRIZ Future Conference 2004 , 2004 .

[10]  Byungun Yoon,et al.  A systematic approach for identifying technology opportunities: Keyword-based morphology analysis , 2005 .

[11]  Juliane Fluck,et al.  Information extraction technologies for the life science industry. , 2005, Drug discovery today. Technologies.

[12]  G. Cascini,et al.  NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING FOR PATENTS ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION , 2005 .

[13]  Amy J. C. Trappey,et al.  Development of a patent document classification and search platform using a back-propagation network , 2006, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  H. Ernst,et al.  Patent portfolio analysis as a useful tool for identifying R&D and business opportunities--an empirical application in the nutrition and health industry , 2006 .

[15]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis , 2006 .

[16]  Massimo Moneglia,et al.  Plagiarism Detection through Multilevel Text Comparison , 2006, 2006 Second International Conference on Automated Production of Cross Media Content for Multi-Channel Distribution (AXMEDIS'06).

[17]  Davide Russo,et al.  Computer-Aided Patent Analysis: finding invention peculiarities , 2007, IFIP CAI.

[18]  Davide Russo,et al.  Computer-aided analysis of patents and search for TRIZ contradictions , 2007 .

[19]  Roland De Guio,et al.  A framework for OTSMTRIZ-based computer support to be used in complex problem management , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol..

[20]  Martin G. Moehrle,et al.  Evaluating the Risk of Patent Infringement by Means of Semantic Patent Analysis: The Case of DNA Chips , 2008 .