Aging modes analysis and physical parameter identification based on a simplified electrochemical model for lithium-ion batteries

Abstract Due to the limited measurements, battery internal failures are hard to quantitatively assess. This work develops a method to quantitatively analyze battery aging modes under different aging conditions and selectively extract the internal indicators to track the battery health state. Considering the changes in physical parameters can reflect the deterioration inside a battery, a simplified electrochemical model that has good identifiability of battery model parameters is introduced, and battery physical parameters are obtained via their functional relationships with the model parameters. The battery aging modes under different aging conditions are then analyzed according to the variations of physical parameters during a battery's lifetime. Lastly, analysis of the correlations between physical parameters and battery state of health is conducted, and health indicators are correspondingly selected. This work can quantificationally analyze the degree of different aging modes from a mechanism perspective, help accurately estimate battery state of health, and predict battery remaining useful life, which has important theoretical significance and practical value for improving the technical level of battery management.

[1]  V. Subramanian,et al.  Efficient Macro-Micro Scale Coupled Modeling of Batteries , 2005 .

[2]  Zonghai Chen,et al.  A novel Gaussian process regression model for state-of-health estimation of lithium-ion battery using charging curve , 2018 .

[3]  Lixin Wang,et al.  An approximate solution for electrolyte concentration distribution in physics-based lithium-ion cell models , 2013, Microelectron. Reliab..

[4]  Jun Bi,et al.  State-of-health estimation of lithium-ion battery packs in electric vehicles based on genetic resampling particle filter , 2016 .

[5]  Jonghyun Park,et al.  A Single Particle Model with Chemical/Mechanical Degradation Physics for Lithium Ion Battery State of Health (SOH) Estimation , 2018 .

[6]  Jun Zheng,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of lithium-ion battery model using genetic algorithm approach , 2014 .

[7]  M. Pecht,et al.  Cycle life testing and modeling of graphite/LiCoO 2 cells under different state of charge ranges , 2016 .

[8]  Joeri Van Mierlo,et al.  A quick on-line state of health estimation method for Li-ion battery with incremental capacity curves processed by Gaussian filter , 2018 .

[9]  Chao Lyu,et al.  Non-Destructive Analysis of Degradation Mechanisms in Cycle-Aged Graphite/LiCoO 2 Batteries , 2014 .

[10]  Fotis Kopsaftopoulos,et al.  Estimating state of charge and health of lithium-ion batteries with guided waves using built-in piezoelectric sensors/actuators , 2018 .

[11]  M. Doyle,et al.  Relaxation Phenomena in Lithium‐Ion‐Insertion Cells , 1994 .

[12]  Dirk Uwe Sauer,et al.  Development of a lifetime prediction model for lithium-ion batteries based on extended accelerated aging test data , 2012 .

[13]  Bo-Suk Yang,et al.  Intelligent prognostics for battery health monitoring based on sample entropy , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  M. Doyle,et al.  Modeling of Galvanostatic Charge and Discharge of the Lithium/Polymer/Insertion Cell , 1993 .

[15]  David He,et al.  Lithium-ion battery life prognostic health management system using particle filtering framework , 2011 .

[16]  Michael Pecht,et al.  A parameter estimation method for a simplified electrochemical model for Li-ion batteries , 2018, Electrochimica Acta.

[17]  Hicham Chaoui,et al.  Aging prediction and state of charge estimation of a LiFePO 4 battery using input time-delayed neural networks , 2017 .

[18]  Aldo Romero-Becerril,et al.  Comparison of discretization methods applied to the single-particle model of lithium-ion batteries , 2011 .