Spatial characteristics of center-surround antagonism in younger and older adults.

Sensitivity to motion direction is affected by stimulus size, contrast (D. Tadin & J. S. Lappin, 2005; D. Tadin, J. S. Lappin, L. A. Gilroy, & R. Blake, 2003), and observer age (L. R. Betts, C. P. Taylor, A. B. Sekuler, & P. J. Bennett, 2005). Here, we investigated the effect of spatial frequency on motion discrimination and how sensitivity changes in older adulthood. We measured stimulus duration thresholds for younger (18-30 years) and older (60-75 years) observers using drifting Gabor gratings that differed in size, spatial frequency, and contrast. A simple model characterized age differences in the threshold-vs.-size functions. The model parameter fits were consistent with an age-related decrease in the strength of spatial suppression. The model also provided good fits to the thresholds when plotted as a function of the total stimulus contrast energy, which suggests that age-related changes in summation and suppression can be modeled as reduced sensitivity to contrast energy. The summation parameter scaled according to stimulus spatial frequency in younger observers only. Suppression strength decreased as a function of spatial frequency in both age groups. Our findings provide additional evidence for age-related changes in summation and suppression mechanisms and suggest that the total contrast energy in the stimulus plays an important role in determining sensitivity to motion direction in both younger and older adults.

[1]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Perceptual consequences of centre–surround antagonism in visual motion processing , 2003, Nature.

[2]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Bit stealing: how to get 1786 or more gray levels from an 8-bit color monitor , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[3]  P. Atchley,et al.  The effect of age, retinal eccentricity, and speed on the detection of optic flow components. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[4]  J. Werner,et al.  The area of complete scotopic spatial summation enlarges with age. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[5]  P. Lennie,et al.  Early and Late Mechanisms of Surround Suppression in Striate Cortex of Macaque , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  A. Bron,et al.  Effect of age on contrast sensitivity function: uniocular and binocular findings. , 1985, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  D. Burr,et al.  Receptive field size of human motion detection units , 1987, Vision Research.

[8]  Robert J. Snowden,et al.  Differences in the processing of short-range apparent motion at small and large displacements , 1990, Vision Research.

[9]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Degradation of stimulus selectivity of visual cortical cells in senescent rhesus monkeys , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  C. Owsley,et al.  Aging, senile miosis and spatial contrast sensitivity at low luminance , 1988, Vision Research.

[11]  J. M. Hupé,et al.  Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons , 1998, Nature.

[12]  B. Brown,et al.  Spatial summation in young and elderly observers , 1989, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[13]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Spatial summation, contrast threshold, and aging. , 1982, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  J. Movshon,et al.  Time Course and Time-Distance Relationships for Surround Suppression in Macaque V1 Neurons , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Human aging and spatial vision. , 1980, Science.

[16]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[17]  C. Curcio Photoreceptor topography in ageing and age-related maculopathy , 2001, Eye.

[18]  G. Woo THE SENESCENCE OF HUMAN VISION , 1993 .

[19]  D. Burr,et al.  Spatial summation properties of directionally selective mechanisms in human vision. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[20]  Christopher Patrick Taylor,et al.  Aging Reduces Center-Surround Antagonism in Visual Motion Processing , 2005, Neuron.

[21]  M E Sloane,et al.  Aging and luminance-adaptation effects on spatial contrast sensitivity. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[22]  D B Elliott,et al.  CONTRAST SENSITIVITY DECLINE WITH AGEING: A NEURAL OR OPTICAL PHENOMENON? * , 1987, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[23]  V.A.F. Lamme,et al.  Beyond the classical receptive field: Contextual modulation of V1 responses , 2004 .

[24]  K Arundale,et al.  An investigation into the variation of human contrast sensitivity with age and ocular pathology. , 1978, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Contrast dependence of response normalization in area MT of the rhesus macaque. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  G. Lennerstrand,et al.  AGE VARIATIONS IN NORMAL HUMAN CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1979, Acta ophthalmologica.

[27]  K. Latham,et al.  Spatial summation of the differential light threshold as a function of visual field location and age , 1994, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[28]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Adaptive center-surround interactions in human vision revealed during binocular rivalry , 2006, Vision Research.

[29]  A. Leventhal,et al.  GABA and Its Agonists Improved Visual Cortical Function in Senescent Monkeys , 2003, Science.

[30]  Duje Tadin,et al.  Optimal size for perceiving motion decreases with contrast , 2005, Vision Research.

[31]  Matteo Carandini,et al.  Two Distinct Mechanisms of Suppression in Human Vision , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  R. Shapley,et al.  Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[35]  Andrew J. Zele,et al.  Disclosing disease mechanisms with a spatio-temporal summation paradigm , 2006, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[36]  M. Folstein,et al.  Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. , 1993, JAMA.

[37]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Contextual modulations of center-surround interactions in motion revealed with the motion aftereffect. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[38]  G. Legge Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: Temporal and spatial properties , 1978, Vision Research.

[39]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Weakened Center-Surround Interactions in Visual Motion Processing in Schizophrenia , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  The relative contributions of pre-neural and neural factors to areal summation in the fovea , 1991, Vision Research.

[41]  J. McCann,et al.  Visibility of low-spatial-frequency sine-wave targets: Dependence on number of cycles. , 1975, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[42]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[43]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[44]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Position-based motion perception for color and texture stimuli: effects of contrast and speed , 1999, Vision Research.

[45]  Barry B. Lee,et al.  Suppressive Surrounds and Contrast Gain in Magnocellular-Pathway Retinal Ganglion Cells of Macaque , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Contrast dependence of contextual effects in primate visual cortex , 1997, nature.

[47]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Receptive field dynamics in adult primary visual cortex , 1992, Nature.

[48]  R. Snowden,et al.  Motion Perception in the Ageing Visual System: Minimum Motion, Motion Coherence, and Speed Discrimination Thresholds , 2006, Perception.

[49]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. II. Linearity of temporal and spatial summation. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  J. Boulton,et al.  Two mechanisms for the detection of slow motion. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[51]  P. D. Spear,et al.  Neural bases of visual deficits during aging , 1993, Vision Research.

[52]  S. Klein,et al.  Cross- and iso- oriented surrounds modulate the contrast response function: the effect of surround contrast. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[53]  Jyrki Rovamo,et al.  Modelling the increase of contrast sensitivity with grating area and exposure time , 1995, Vision Research.

[54]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Psychophysical isolation of movement sensitivity by removal of familiar position cues , 1981, Vision Research.

[55]  D. Lewis,et al.  Cortical inhibitory neurons and schizophrenia , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[56]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Center–surround interactions in visual motion processing during binocular rivalry , 2004, Vision Research.

[57]  Vasudevan Lakshminarayanan,et al.  Psychophysical estimation of speed discrimination. II. Aging effects. , 2005, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[58]  B. Brown,et al.  Age-Related Changes in Contrast Sensitivity in Central and Peripheral Retina , 1988, Perception.

[59]  Isabelle Mareschal,et al.  Effects of contrast and size on orientation discrimination , 2004, Vision Research.

[60]  David J Heeger,et al.  Response Suppression in V1 Agrees with Psychophysics of Surround Masking , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  J. Movshon,et al.  Nature and interaction of signals from the receptive field center and surround in macaque V1 neurons. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[62]  P. Bennett,et al.  Effects of aging on calculation efficiency and equivalent noise. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[63]  Alan Peters,et al.  Effects of aging on myelinated nerve fibers in monkey primary visual cortex , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[64]  H. Leibowitz,et al.  Age differences in estimating vehicle velocity. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[65]  S J Anderson,et al.  Peripheral spatial vision: limits imposed by optics, photoreceptors, and receptor pooling. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[66]  Paul R. Martin,et al.  Extraclassical Receptive Field Properties of Parvocellular, Magnocellular, and Koniocellular Cells in the Primate Lateral Geniculate Nucleus , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[67]  G Westheimer,et al.  Dynamics of spatial summation in primary visual cortex of alert monkeys. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  S. Drance,et al.  Studies of spatial summation of central retinal areas in normal people of all ages. , 1971, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[69]  RussLL L. Ds Vnlos,et al.  SPATIAL FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY OF CELLS IN MACAQUE VISUAL CORTEX , 2022 .

[70]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood , 1982, Vision Research.

[71]  L. Chalupa,et al.  The visual neurosciences , 2004 .

[72]  H. Ozeki,et al.  Relationship between Excitation and Inhibition Underlying Size Tuning and Contextual Response Modulation in the Cat Primary Visual Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[73]  M E Wilson,et al.  Invariant features of spatial summation with changing locus in the visual field , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[74]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Center–surround inhibition deepens binocular rivalry suppression , 2005, Vision Research.

[75]  Displacement thresholds for unidirectional and oscillatory movement , 1981, Vision Research.

[76]  Cynthia Owsley,et al.  Aging and neural spatial contrast sensitivity: Photopic vision , 1993, Vision Research.

[77]  K Kani,et al.  Retinal sensitivity and spatial summation in the foveal and parafoveal regions. , 1981, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[78]  D. Fitzpatrick Seeing beyond the receptive field in primary visual cortex , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[79]  R. Hess,et al.  The functional area for summation to threshold for sinusoidal gratings , 1978, Vision Research.

[80]  D. Heeger,et al.  Measurement and modeling of center-surround suppression and enhancement , 2001, Vision Research.

[81]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Center-surround inhibition and facilitation as a function of size and contrast at multiple levels of visual motion processing. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[82]  Yuanye Ma,et al.  Degradation of signal timing in cortical areas V1 and V2 of senescent monkeys. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[83]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Response to motion in extrastriate area MSTl: center-surround interactions. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[84]  H. Barlow Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities , 1958, The Journal of physiology.

[85]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[86]  A. Harman,et al.  Neuronal density in the human retinal ganglion cell layer from 16–77 years , 2000, The Anatomical record.

[87]  Jyrki Rovamo,et al.  Spatial integration of band-pass filtered patterns in noise , 1993, Vision Research.

[88]  Jyrki Rovamo,et al.  Modelling the dependence of contrast sensitivity on grating area and spatial frequency , 1993, Vision Research.

[89]  F A Bilsen,et al.  The influence of the number of cycles upon the visual contrast threshold for spatial sine wave patterns. , 1974, Vision research.

[90]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  Contrast dependence of suppressive influences in cortical area MT of alert macaque. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[91]  R. Snowden Sensitivity to Relative and Absolute Motion , 1992, Perception.

[92]  N. Hiller,et al.  Diminished Spatial Summation Contributes to the Age Deficit in the Discrimination of Low-Contrast Vernier Oscillation , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[93]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .