T-cell epitope prediction and immune complex simulation using molecular dynamics: state of the art and persisting challenges
暂无分享,去创建一个
Peter V Coveney | Shunzhou Wan | Matthew N Davies | Darren R Flower | Kanchan Phadwal | Isabel K Macdonald | P. Coveney | D. Flower | M. Davies | S. Wan | K. Phadwal | I. Macdonald
[1] Mark M Davis,et al. T cells as a self-referential, sensory organ. , 2007, Annual review of immunology.
[2] Rino Rappuoli,et al. Post‐genomic vaccine development , 2006, FEBS letters.
[3] J. Stewart. Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods II. Applications , 1989 .
[4] C. DeLisi,et al. Role of conserved regions of class I MHC molecules in the activation of CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes by peptide and purified cell-free class I molecules. , 1993, International immunology.
[5] M. Dewar,et al. Ground States of Molecules. 38. The MNDO Method. Approximations and Parameters , 1977 .
[6] Samuel Genheden,et al. How to obtain statistically converged MM/GBSA results , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..
[7] B. Berne. Modification of the overlap potential to mimic a linear site-site potential , 1981 .
[8] Nikolai Petrovsky,et al. Immunome Research , 2005, Immunome research.
[9] Weitao Yang,et al. A Linear-Scaling Quantum Mechanical Investigation of Cytidine Deaminase , 1999 .
[10] B. Maillère,et al. 3-Layer-based analysis of peptide-MHC interaction: in silico prediction, peptide binding affinity and T cell activation in a relevant allergen-specific model. , 2009, Molecular immunology.
[11] Bernhard Knapp,et al. A critical cross-validation of high throughput structural binding prediction methods for pMHC , 2009, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[12] D. Bashford,et al. Solvation energy density occlusion approximation for evaluation of desolvation penalties in biomolecular interactions , 2001, Proteins.
[13] Jay T. Groves,et al. Synaptic pattern formation during cellular recognition , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[14] R. Dror,et al. Long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of protein structure and function. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.
[15] D. Rognan,et al. Predicting binding affinities of protein ligands from three-dimensional models: application to peptide binding to class I major histocompatibility proteins. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[16] D. Truhlar,et al. QM/MM: what have we learned, where are we, and where do we go from here? , 2007 .
[17] Mark M Davis,et al. How T cells 'see' antigen , 2005, Nature Immunology.
[18] C A Floudas,et al. A predictive method for the evaluation of peptide binding in pocket 1 of HLA‐DRB1 via global minimization of energy interactions , 1997, Proteins.
[19] Jürgen Schlitter,et al. Targeted Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Conformational Change-Application to the T ↔ R Transition in Insulin , 1993 .
[20] Peter V Coveney,et al. Molecular dynamics simulations: bring biomolecular structures alive on a computer. , 2007, Methods in molecular biology.
[21] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Comparison of protein force fields for molecular dynamics simulations. , 2008, Methods in molecular biology.
[22] A Caflisch,et al. Monte Carlo docking of oligopeptides to proteins , 1992, Proteins.
[23] Matthew N Davies,et al. Harnessing bioinformatics to discover new vaccines. , 2007, Drug discovery today.
[24] Eamonn F. Healy,et al. Development and use of quantum mechanical molecular models. 76. AM1: a new general purpose quantum mechanical molecular model , 1985 .
[25] Jianpeng Ma,et al. Usefulness and limitations of normal mode analysis in modeling dynamics of biomolecular complexes. , 2005, Structure.
[26] Gerhard Hummer,et al. Kinetics from nonequilibrium single-molecule pulling experiments. , 2003, Biophysical journal.
[27] S. Bromley,et al. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. , 1999, Science.
[28] Rino Rappuoli,et al. Vaccinology in the genome era. , 2009, The Journal of clinical investigation.
[29] Walter Thiel,et al. Ground States of Molecules. 38. The MNDO Method. Approximations and Parameters , 1977 .
[30] Federico Fogolari,et al. Protocol for MM/PBSA molecular dynamics simulations of proteins. , 2003, Biophysical journal.
[31] Vladimir Brusic,et al. Evaluation of MHC-II peptide binding prediction servers: applications for vaccine research , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.
[32] K. Schulten,et al. Calculating potentials of mean force from steered molecular dynamics simulations. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.
[33] Mark C Evans,et al. Recent advances in immunoinformatics: application of in silico tools to drug development. , 2008, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.
[34] Klaus Schulten,et al. Atomic-level structural and functional model of a bacterial photosynthetic membrane vesicle , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[35] Junmei Wang,et al. Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..
[36] Daniel Coombs,et al. Equilibrium thermodynamics of cell-cell adhesion mediated by multiple ligand-receptor pairs. , 2004, Biophysical journal.
[37] Mark M Davis,et al. Dynamics of cell surface molecules during T cell recognition. , 2003, Annual review of biochemistry.
[38] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Determination of Electrostatic Parameters for a Polarizable Force Field Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator. , 2005, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[39] Gerhard Hummer,et al. Extracting kinetics from single-molecule force spectroscopy: nanopore unzipping of DNA hairpins. , 2007, Biophysical journal.
[40] D. Rognan,et al. Customized versus universal scoring functions: application to class I MHC-peptide binding free energy predictions. , 2001, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.
[41] Anne S De Groot,et al. Immunomics: discovering new targets for vaccines and therapeutics. , 2006, Drug discovery today.
[42] C DeLisi,et al. TcR recognition of the MHC-peptide dimer: structural properties of a ternary complex. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[43] D. Rognan,et al. Rational design of nonnatural peptides as high-affinity ligands for the HLA-B*2705 human leukocyte antigen. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[44] K. Kim,et al. Selection of peptides that bind to the HLA-A2.1 molecule by molecular modelling. , 1996, Molecular immunology.
[45] C. DeLisi,et al. Free energy mapping of class I MHC molecules and structural determination of bound peptides , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[46] Seema Mishra,et al. Immunoinformatics and Modeling Perspective of T Cell Epitope-Based Cancer Immunotherapy: A Holistic Picture , 2009, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.
[47] P. Krüger,et al. Targeted molecular dynamics: a new approach for searching pathways of conformational transitions. , 1994, Journal of molecular graphics.
[48] Markus Christen,et al. The GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation: GROMOS05 , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..
[49] Martin Zacharias,et al. Flexibility of the MHC class II peptide binding cleft in the bound, partially filled, and empty states: a molecular dynamics simulation study. , 2009, Biopolymers.
[50] Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..
[51] Laura Serino,et al. Genome-based approaches to develop vaccines against bacterial pathogens. , 2009, Vaccine.
[52] Darren R Flower,et al. Immunoinformatics and the in silico prediction of immunogenicity. An introduction. , 2007, Methods in molecular biology.
[53] P. He,et al. QM/MM Study of Epitope Peptides Binding to HLA‐A*0201: The Roles of Anchor Residues and Water , 2009, Chemical biology & drug design.
[54] Channa K. Hattotuwagama,et al. Receptor-ligand binding sites and virtual screening. , 2006, Current medicinal chemistry.
[55] G. Holdgate,et al. Isothermal titration calorimetry in drug discovery. , 2001, Progress in medicinal chemistry.
[56] Tin Wee Tan,et al. In silico characterization of immunogenic epitopes presented by HLA-Cw*0401 , 2007, Immunome research.
[57] E. Lewis,et al. Isothermal titration calorimetry: experimental design, data analysis, and probing macromolecule/ligand binding and kinetic interactions. , 2008, Methods in cell biology.
[58] P. Coveney,et al. Toward an atomistic understanding of the immune synapse: large-scale molecular dynamics simulation of a membrane-embedded TCR-pMHC-CD4 complex. , 2008, Molecular immunology.
[59] C. Carter,et al. Active Species for the Ground-State Complex of Cytidine Deaminase: A Linear-Scaling Quantum Mechanical Investigation , 1998 .
[60] Reinhard Lipowsky,et al. Pattern formation during T-cell adhesion. , 2004, Biophysical journal.
[61] J. Agrewala,et al. In silico methods for predicting T-cell epitopes: Dr Jekyll or Mr Hyde? , 2009, Expert review of proteomics.
[62] Peter A. Kollman,et al. AMBER: Assisted model building with energy refinement. A general program for modeling molecules and their interactions , 1981 .
[63] D Rognan,et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of MHC-peptide complexes as a tool for predicting potential T cell epitopes. , 1994, Biochemistry.
[64] B Honig,et al. On the calculation of binding free energies using continuum methods: Application to MHC class I protein‐peptide interactions , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[65] R. Rappuoli,et al. Vaccines in the era of genomics: the pneumococcal challenge. , 2007, Vaccine.
[66] D. Flower,et al. Benchmarking B cell epitope prediction: Underperformance of existing methods , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[67] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug‐like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all‐atom additive biological force fields , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..
[68] K Y Sanbonmatsu,et al. High performance computing in biology: multimillion atom simulations of nanoscale systems. , 2007, Journal of structural biology.
[69] R. Ferrando,et al. Collective and single particle diffusion on surfaces , 2002 .
[70] P. Kollman,et al. A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5179−5197 , 1996 .
[71] Martin Zacharias,et al. Peptide binding to MHC class I and II proteins: new avenues from new methods. , 2010, Molecular immunology.
[72] S Vajda,et al. Flexible docking of peptides to class I major-histocompatibility-complex receptors. , 1995, Genetic analysis : biomolecular engineering.
[73] Tai-Sung Lee,et al. Linear-scaling quantum mechanical calculations of biological molecules: The divide-and-conquer approach , 1998 .
[74] Walter Filgueira de Azevedo,et al. Experimental approaches to evaluate the thermodynamics of protein-drug interactions. , 2008, Current drug targets.
[75] Anthony Cruz,et al. Model for the Peptide-Free Conformation of Class II MHC Proteins , 2008, PloS one.
[76] Helmut Grubmüller,et al. Molecular Anatomy of a Trafficking Organelle , 2006, Cell.
[77] G. Hummer,et al. Theory, analysis, and interpretation of single-molecule force spectroscopy experiments , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[78] Olivier Michielin,et al. Binding free energy differences in a TCR-peptide-MHC complex induced by a peptide mutation: a simulation analysis. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.
[79] Ying Xu,et al. Limitations of Ab Initio Predictions of Peptide Binding to MHC Class II Molecules , 2010, PloS one.
[80] Anne S De Groot,et al. From genome to vaccine--new immunoinformatics tools for vaccine design. , 2004, Methods.
[81] Henry S. Rzepa,et al. Ground states of molecules: Part XLII. Vibrational frequencies of isotopically-substituted molecules calculated using MINDO/3 force constants , 1977 .
[82] Uthaman Gowthaman,et al. In silico tools for predicting peptides binding to HLA-class II molecules: more confusion than conclusion. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.
[83] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Computational evaluation of protein-small molecule binding. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.
[84] M Karplus,et al. Modeling of the TCR-MHC-peptide complex. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.
[85] Jianpeng Ma,et al. CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..
[86] Vasant Honavar,et al. On Evaluating MHC-II Binding Peptide Prediction Methods , 2008, PloS one.
[87] R. Jernigan,et al. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[88] A Sette,et al. A structure-based algorithm to predict potential binding peptides to MHC molecules with hydrophobic binding pockets. , 1997, Human immunology.
[89] Peter V. Coveney,et al. Automated Molecular Simulation Based Binding Affinity Calculator for Ligand-Bound HIV-1 Proteases , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[90] Darren R. Flower,et al. Bioinformatics for Vaccinology , 2008 .
[91] K. Schulten,et al. Free energy calculation from steered molecular dynamics simulations using Jarzynski's equality , 2003 .
[92] G. Hummer,et al. Free energy reconstruction from nonequilibrium single-molecule pulling experiments , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[93] D. Rognan,et al. An HLA-B27 polymorphism (B*2710) that is critical for T-cell recognition has limited effects on peptide specificity. , 1998, Tissue antigens.
[94] H. Margalit,et al. Ranking potential binding peptides to MHC molecules by a computational threading approach. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.
[95] J. Valverde. Molecular Modelling: Principles and Applications , 2001 .
[96] Joo Chuan Tong,et al. Immunoinformatics: Current trends and future directions , 2009, Drug Discovery Today.
[97] V. Brusic,et al. Evaluation of MHC class I peptide binding prediction servers: Applications for vaccine research , 2008, BMC Immunology.
[98] James J. P. Stewart,et al. Development and use of quantum mechanical molecular models. 76. AM1: a new general purpose quantum mechanical molecular model. [Erratum to document cited in CA103(2):11627f] , 1993 .
[99] D. Flower,et al. Static energy analysis of MHC class I and class II peptide-binding affinity. , 2007, Methods in molecular biology.
[100] C. DeLisi,et al. Computing the structure of bound peptides. Application to antigen recognition by class I major histocompatibility complex receptors. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.
[101] Peter L. Freddolino,et al. Molecular dynamics simulations of the complete satellite tobacco mosaic virus. , 2006, Structure.
[102] J. Berg,et al. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.
[103] Review of ”Bioinformatics for vaccinology“ edited by Darren R. Flower , 2009, Virology Journal.
[104] D Rognan,et al. Molecular modeling of an antigenic complex between a viral peptide and a class I major histocompatibility glycoprotein , 1992, Proteins.
[105] H Liu,et al. Rapid non-empirical approaches for estimating relative binding free energies. , 1995, Acta biochimica Polonica.
[106] C DeLisi,et al. Computational determination of side chain specificity for pockets in class I MHC molecules. , 1996, Molecular immunology.
[107] R. Rappuoli,et al. Genome‑based vaccine development: A short cut for the future , 2008, Human vaccines.
[108] P. Coveney,et al. Molecular Basis of Peptide Recognition by the TCR: Affinity Differences Calculated Using Large Scale Computing1 , 2005, The Journal of Immunology.
[109] S Vajda,et al. Toward computational determination of peptide‐receptor structure , 1993, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[110] A. Giuliani,et al. A computational approach identifies two regions of Hepatitis C Virus E1 protein as interacting domains involved in viral fusion process , 2009, BMC Structural Biology.
[111] Didier Rognan,et al. Fine specificity of antigen binding to two class I major histocompatibility proteins (B*2705 and B*2703) differing in a single amino acid residue , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[112] A. Liwo,et al. Computational techniques for efficient conformational sampling of proteins. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.
[113] T. Auton,et al. Statistical comparison of established T-cell epitope predictors against a large database of human and murine antigens. , 1996, Molecular immunology.
[114] Martin Zacharias,et al. Conformational flexibility of the MHC class I alpha1-alpha2 domain in peptide bound and free states: a molecular dynamics simulation study. , 2004, Biophysical journal.
[115] P. Tavan,et al. Ligand Binding: Molecular Mechanics Calculation of the Streptavidin-Biotin Rupture Force , 1996, Science.
[116] J. Stewart. Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods I. Method , 1989 .
[117] Karl F Freed,et al. All‐atom fast protein folding simulations: The villin headpiece , 2002, Proteins.
[118] C DeLisi,et al. Graphical representations of the class I MHC cleft. , 1993, Journal of molecular graphics.
[119] Minoru Sakurai,et al. Application of an integrated MOZYME+DFT method to pKa calculations for proteins , 2001 .
[120] Gamze Gürsoy,et al. Mechanical Signaling on the Single Protein Level Studied Using Steered Molecular Dynamics , 2009, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.
[121] C DeLisi,et al. Structural principles that govern the peptide-binding motifs of class I MHC molecules. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.
[122] Claudio Donati,et al. Microbial genomes and vaccine design: refinements to the classical reverse vaccinology approach. , 2006, Current opinion in microbiology.
[123] J L Cornette,et al. Consistency in structural energetics of protein folding and peptide recognition , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[124] Rino Rappuoli,et al. The use of genomics in microbial vaccine development , 2009, Drug Discovery Today.
[125] Mark M. Davis,et al. Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells , 2002, Nature.
[126] Volodymyr V. Kindratenko,et al. Implementation of NAMD molecular dynamics non-bonded force-field on the cell broadband engine processor , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing.
[127] Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al. NAMD: a Parallel, Object-Oriented Molecular Dynamics Program , 1996, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..
[128] S Vajda,et al. Effect of conformational flexibility and solvation on receptor-ligand binding free energies. , 1994, Biochemistry.
[129] Olivier Michielin,et al. Protein-protein interaction investigated by steered molecular dynamics: the TCR-pMHC complex. , 2008, Biophysical journal.
[130] Peter V Coveney,et al. Peptide recognition by the T cell receptor: comparison of binding free energies from thermodynamic integration, Poisson–Boltzmann and linear interaction energy approximations , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[131] M. Zacharias,et al. Conformational flexibility of the MHC class I alpha1-alpha2 domain in peptide bound and free states: a molecular dynamics simulation study. , 2004, Biophysical journal.
[132] Shunzhou Wan,et al. Large‐scale molecular dynamics simulations of HLA‐A*0201 complexed with a tumor‐specific antigenic peptide: Can the α3 and β2m domains be neglected? , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..
[133] P. Kollman,et al. A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .
[134] Norman L. Allinger,et al. Molecular mechanics. The MM3 force field for hydrocarbons. 1 , 1989 .
[135] O. Schueler‐Furman,et al. Structure‐based prediction of binding peptides to MHC class I molecules: Application to a broad range of MHC alleles , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[136] Arup K Chakraborty,et al. The Immunological Synapse Balances T Cell Receptor Signaling and Degradation , 2003, Science.
[137] Morten Nielsen,et al. A Community Resource Benchmarking Predictions of Peptide Binding to MHC-I Molecules , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[138] James J. P. Stewart,et al. Application of the PM6 method to modeling proteins , 2009, Journal of molecular modeling.
[139] S Vajda,et al. Prediction of protein complexes using empirical free energy functions , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[140] Peter V. Coveney,et al. Real science at the petascale , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[141] D. Rognan,et al. Molecular dynamics and structure-based drug design for predicting non-natural nonapeptide binding to a class I MHC protein. , 1995, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.
[142] Kurt Kremer,et al. Bridging the Gap Between Atomistic and Coarse-Grained Models of Polymers: Status and Perspectives , 2000 .
[143] P. Kollman,et al. New-generation amber united-atom force field. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[144] Takuya Takahashi,et al. Prediction of T-cell epitope. , 2007, Journal of pharmacological sciences.
[145] Darren R Flower,et al. Towards in silico prediction of immunogenic epitopes. , 2003, Trends in immunology.
[146] Karina Yusim,et al. Immunoinformatics Comes of Age , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..