An Investigation of the Guilty Knowledge Test Polygraph Examination

The Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT) is a psychophysiological questioning technique that can be used as part of a polygraph examination which purports to assess whether suspects conceal “guilty knowledge” by measuring their physiological responses while responding to a series of multiple choice questions. The present study sets out to consider a number of key issues in relation to the GKT paradigm. Specifically, the following questions were considered: Does response mode matter? Does motivation influence outcome? Are combined physiological measures better than single ones? Does gender have an effect on physiological responsivity during a polygraph examination? Results demonstrated real variations between the physiological measures used. Gender differences were also observed in polygraph response patterns. These findings are discussed in relation to the validity of the Guilty Knowledge Test.

[1]  D. C. Raskin,et al.  Effectiveness of techniques and physiological measures in the detection of deception. , 1978, Psychophysiology.

[2]  M. T. Bradley,et al.  Alcohol and the psychophysiological detection of deception. , 1984, Psychophysiology.

[3]  G. Crombez,et al.  Behavioural responding to concealed information: Examining the role of relevance orienting , 2005 .

[4]  Klaus Fiedler,et al.  What Is the Current Truth About Polygraph Lie Detection? , 2002 .

[5]  R. Stark,et al.  An interfering Go/No-go task does not affect accuracy in a Concealed Information Test. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[6]  Gershon Ben-Shakhar,et al.  Behavioral and physiological measures in the detection of concealed information. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  Shinji Hira,et al.  Polygraphic Examinations in Japan: Application of the Guilty Knowledge Test in Forensic Investigations , 2002 .

[8]  Eran Dayan,et al.  Estimating the validity of the guilty knowledge test from simulated experiments: the external validity of mock crime studies. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[9]  P. Venables,et al.  Direct measurement of skin conductance: a proposal for standardization. , 1971, Psychophysiology.

[10]  D. Lykken,et al.  Psychology and the lie detector industry. , 1974, The American psychologist.

[11]  M. T. Bradley,et al.  Awareness of crime-relevant information and the Guilty Knowledge Test , 1992 .

[12]  R J Cutrow,et al.  The objective use of multiple physiological indices in the detection of deception. , 1972, Psychophysiology.

[13]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities, 2nd ed. , 2008 .

[14]  D. Lykken.  The GSR in the detection of guilt. , 1959 .

[15]  Takehiko Yamamura,et al.  Development of the polygraph technique in Japan for detection of deception , 1990 .

[16]  J J Furedy,et al.  The roles of deception, intention to deceive, and motivation to avoid detection in the psychophysiological detection of guilty knowledge. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[17]  Gershon Ben-Shakhar,et al.  The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: a meta-analytic review. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  I. Lieblich,et al.  Guilty knowledge technique: application of signal detection measures. , 1970, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  Manuel G. Calvo,et al.  Emotional reactivity to social-evaluative stress: genderdifferences in response systems concordance , 1999 .

[20]  G. Ben-Shakhar,et al.  Standardization within individuals: a simple method to neutralize individual differences in skin conductance. , 1985, Psychophysiology.

[21]  Niklas Ravaja,et al.  Salience of Guilty Knowledge Test items affects accuracy in realistic mock crimes. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[22]  M. T. Bradley,et al.  Polygraph Lie Detection on Real Events in a Laboratory Setting , 1993, Perceptual and motor skills.

[23]  Gershon Ben-Shakhar,et al.  Covert respiration measures for the detection of concealed information , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[24]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  Antisociality, underarousal and the validity of the Concealed Information Polygraph Test , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[25]  C. Honts,et al.  Effects of Outside Issues on the Comparison Question Test , 2004, The Journal of general psychology.

[26]  Vance V. MacLaren,et al.  A quantitative review of the guilty knowledge test. , 2001 .

[27]  C. Honts.  The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts: The psychophysiological detection of deception , 2004 .

[28]  G. Ben-Shakhar,et al.  Effects of item repetitions and variations on the efficiency of the guilty knowledge test. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[29]  Matthias Gamer,et al.  Psychophysiological and vocal measures in the detection of guilty knowledge. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[30]  David T. Lykken,et al.  A Tremor in the Blood: Uses and Abuses of the Lie Detector , 1980 .

[31]  R I Thackray,et al.  A comparison of physiological indices in detection of deception. , 1968, Psychophysiology.

[32]  D. C. Raskin,et al.  Human versus computerized evaluations of polygraph data in a laboratory setting. , 1988, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  J J Furedy,et al.  Differentiation of deception as a psychological process: a psychophysiological approach. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[34]  G. Ben-Shakhar,et al.  Psychophysiological detection through the guilty knowledge technique: effects of mental countermeasures. , 1996, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  C. Horneman,et al.  Detectability in the card test as a function of the subject's verbal response. , 1985, Psychophysiology.

[36]  G. Ben-Shakhar,et al.  Effects of motivation and verbal-response type on psychophysiological detection of information. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[37]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  Autonomic and behavioral responding to concealed information: differentiating orienting and defensive responses. , 2004, Psychophysiology.