In-situ monitoring of Direct Energy Deposition via Structured Light System and its application in remanufacturing industry

The direct energy deposition (DED) process utilizes laser energy to melt metal powders and deposit them on the substrate layer to manufacture complex metal parts. This study was applied as a remanufacturing and repair process to fix used parts, which reduced unnecessary waste in the manufacturing industry. However, there could be defects generated during the repair, such as porosity or bumpy morphological defects. Traditionally the operator would use a design of experiment (DOE) or simulation method to understand the printing parameters’ influence on the printed part. There are several influential factors: laser power, scanning speed, powder feeding rate, and standoff distance. Each DED machine has a different setup in practice, which results in some uncertainties for the printing results. For example, the nozzle diameter and laser type could be varied in different DED machines. Thus, it was hypothesized that a repair could be more effective if the printing process could be monitored in real time. In this study, a structured light system (SLS) was used to capture the printing process’s layer-wise information. The SLS system is capable of performing 3D surface scanning with a high resolution of 10 μm. It can provide the information to determine how much material needs to be deposited and monitor the layer-wide surface topography for each layer in real-time. Once a defect was found in situ, the DED machine (hybrid machine) would change the tool and remove the flawed layer. After the repair, the nondestructive approach computed tomography (CT) was applied to examine its interior features. In this research, a DED machine using 316L stainless steel was used to perform the repairing process to demonstrate its effectiveness. The lab-built SLS system was used to capture each layer’s information, and CT data was provided for the quality evaluation. The novel manufacturing approach could improve the DED repair quality, reduce the repair time, and promote repair automation. In the future, it has a great potential to be used in the manufacturing industry to repair used parts and avoid the extra cost involved in buying a new part.

[1]  Kejin Wang,et al.  Evaluation of cement paste containing recycled stainless steel powder for sustainable additive manufacturing , 2019 .

[2]  A. Molotnikov,et al.  Effect of build height on the properties of large format stainless steel 316L fabricated via directed energy deposition , 2020 .

[3]  A. Beese,et al.  Effect of processing parameters on microstructure and tensile properties of austenitic stainless steel 304L made by directed energy deposition additive manufacturing , 2016 .

[4]  Xiaolei Shi,et al.  3D printing and characterization of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and methylcellulose for biodegradable support structures , 2019, Polymer.

[5]  Beiwen Li,et al.  Flexible calibration method for microscopic structured light system using telecentric lens. , 2015, Optics express.

[6]  Beiwen Li,et al.  Structured light system calibration method with optimal fringe angle. , 2014, Applied optics.

[7]  Tom McDonald,et al.  Accelerating Industrial Adoption of Metal Additive Manufacturing Technology , 2016 .

[8]  Minking K. Chyu,et al.  Finite element modeling and validation of thermomechanical behavior of Ti-6Al-4V in directed energy deposition additive manufacturing , 2016 .

[9]  Kellen D. Traxel,et al.  Invited Review Article: Metal-additive manufacturing - Modeling strategies for application-optimized designs. , 2018, Additive manufacturing.

[10]  Dong-Gyu Ahn,et al.  Direct metal additive manufacturing processes and their sustainable applications for green technology: A review , 2016 .

[11]  H. Qin,et al.  Correlation approach for quality assurance of additive manufactured parts based on optical metrology , 2020 .

[12]  D. Shim,et al.  Effect of substrate preheating by induction heater on direct energy deposition of AISI M4 powder , 2017 .

[13]  C. Sanz,et al.  Laser Cladding of Vanadium-Carbide Tool Steels for Die Repair , 2011 .

[14]  Yi Zheng,et al.  Similarity evaluation of 3D topological measurement results using statistical methods , 2020, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[15]  J. Hofman,et al.  A camera based feedback control strategy for the laser cladding process , 2012 .

[17]  Yaoyu Ding,et al.  Development of sensing and control system for robotized laser-based direct metal addition system , 2016 .

[18]  M. Matthews,et al.  Direct measurements of laser absorptivity during metal melt pool formation associated with powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes , 2018, Journal of Laser Applications.

[19]  A. Khajepour,et al.  Effect of real-time cooling rate on microstructure in Laser Additive Manufacturing , 2016 .

[20]  Jan Bültmann,et al.  Design of an Optical system for the In Situ Process Monitoring of Selective Laser Melting (SLM) , 2011 .

[21]  Jean-Pierre Kruth,et al.  Determination of geometrical factors in Layerwise Laser Melting using optical process monitoring , 2011 .

[22]  Nicola Senin,et al.  Surface texture metrology for metal additive manufacturing: a review , 2016 .

[23]  B. Graf,et al.  Laser Metal Deposition as Repair Technology for Stainless Steel and Titanium Alloys , 2012 .

[24]  J. Beuth,et al.  Localized Preheating Approaches for Reducing Residual Stress in Additive Manufacturing , 2006 .

[25]  Yung C. Shin,et al.  Remanufacturing of turbine blades by laser direct deposition with its energy and environmental impact analysis , 2014 .

[26]  Seung Ki Moon,et al.  Process monitoring and inspection systems in metal additive manufacturing: Status and applications , 2017 .

[27]  Michael R. Hill,et al.  Effect of interlayers and scanning strategies on through-thickness residual stress distributions in additive manufactured ferritic-austenitic steel structure , 2019, Materials Science and Engineering: A.

[28]  Yi Zheng,et al.  Similarity evaluation of topography measurement results by different optical metrology technologies for additive manufactured parts , 2020 .

[29]  A. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Additive manufacturing in repair: Influence of processing parameters on properties of Inconel 718 , 2019, Materials Letters.

[30]  C. Shuai,et al.  Laser additive manufacturing of Zn-2Al part for bone repair: Formability, microstructure and properties , 2019, Journal of Alloys and Compounds.