Forward Surgical Teams provide comparable outcomes to combat support hospitals during support and stabilization operations on the battlefield.

BACKGROUND Forward Surgical Teams (FST) provide forward deployed surgical care within the battle space. The next level of care in theater, the Combat Support Hospitals (CSH), are distinguished from the FST by advanced resource capabilities including more complex diagnostic imaging, laboratory support with blood banking, and intensive care units. This study was intended to assess the effect of FST capability on the outcome of seriously injured casualties in comparison to the CSH. METHODS We reviewed all casualty records in the Joint Theater Trauma Registry database from April 2004 to April 2006. The study cohort included all US military battle casualties who were admitted to either a FST or a CSH and were not returned to duty within 72 hours. Data were tabulated and assessed for basic demographics, mechanism of injury, injury severity score, ventilator and critical care days, and mortality. Statistical inferences were made using Chi square and Student's t tests. RESULTS As of April 2006, the above information was available in the Joint Theater Trauma Registry on 2,617 US military battle casualties who survived to reach care at a FST and/or CSH. Of this population, 77 subsequently died of wounds and 2,540 survived. We found no significant difference in died of wounds rates between the sample populations or rates of ventilator or critical care days between the two groups, nor did controlling for injury severity score alter this picture. The most significant predictor of mortality in both these groups was head injury. CONCLUSIONS The disparity between the availability of the highest level of injury care and the ability to care for injury as soon as possible is an issue of central importance to both the civilian and military trauma care communities. Our analysis demonstrates that despite the operational and logistic challenges that burden the FST, this level of surgical care confers equivalent battlefield injury outcome results compared with the CSH.

[1]  A. Beekley United States military surgical response to modern large-scale conflicts: the ongoing evolution of a trauma system. , 2006, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[2]  L. Chambers,et al.  Initial experience of US Marine Corps forward resuscitative surgical system during Operation Iraqi Freedom. , 2005, Archives of surgery.

[3]  John B. Holcomb,et al.  Trauma system development in a theater of war: Experiences from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. , 2006 .

[4]  J. Dye,et al.  Wounding patterns for U.S. Marines and sailors during Operation Iraqi Freedom, major combat phase. , 2006, Military medicine.

[5]  L. Chambers,et al.  Invasion vs insurgency: US Navy/Marine Corps forward surgical care during Operation Iraqi Freedom. , 2008, Archives of surgery.

[6]  L. Chambers,et al.  The experience of the US Marine Corps' Surgical Shock Trauma Platoon with 417 operative combat casualties during a 12 month period of operation Iraqi Freedom. , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  James Zouris,et al.  Descriptive summary of patients seen at the surgical companies during Operation Iraqi Freedom-1. , 2007, Military medicine.

[8]  L. Chambers,et al.  The U.S. Navy's forward resuscitative surgery system during Operation Iraqi Freedom. , 2005, Military medicine.

[9]  G. Wortmann,et al.  Operation Enduring Freedom: the 48th Combat Support Hospital in Afghanistan. , 2006, Military medicine.

[10]  B. Starnes,et al.  Supporting the Global War on Terror: a tale of two campaigns featuring the 250th Forward Surgical Team (Airborne). , 2005, American journal of surgery.

[11]  B. Starnes,et al.  Lessons learned from modern military surgery. , 2007, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[12]  Alec C Beekley,et al.  Combat trauma experience with the United States Army 102nd Forward Surgical Team in Afghanistan. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[13]  N. Mann,et al.  Preferential benefit of implementation of a statewide trauma system in one of two adjacent states. , 1997, Journal of Trauma.

[14]  Robert Rush,et al.  The Army forward surgical team: update and lessons learned, 1997-2004. , 2006, Military medicine.

[15]  A. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Relative importance of designation and accreditation of trauma centers during evolution of a regional trauma system. , 2002, The Journal of trauma.

[16]  C. Mock,et al.  Systematic review of trauma system effectiveness based on registry comparisons. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[17]  V. Markovchick,et al.  Optimal trauma outcome: trauma system design and the trauma team. , 2007, Emergency medicine clinics of North America.