Achievement and Satisfaction in Blended Learning versus Traditional General Health Course Designs

Blended learning is a hybrid of classroom and on-line learning that includes some of the conveniences of on-line courses without the complete loss of face-to-face tact. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate student achievement and satisfaction with blended learning course delivery compared to a traditional face-to-face class format in a general health course. Method: Surveys were distributed to randomly selected classes during the fall 2007 semester: three blended and one traditional sections participated (n=251). Results: Total satisfaction scores between blended (54.986) and traditional (49.788) classes were significantly different (p< 0.01). Achievement by students of blended and traditional sections brought mixed findings, yet blended students’ overall grades were significantly higher (p=0.048). Conclusion: Results indicated that a blended course delivery is preferred over a traditional lecture format, and promising data emerged to challenge teachers’ traditional approach to teaching general health courses at the university level.

[1]  N. Hara.  STUDENT DISTRESS IN A WEB-BASED DISTANCE EDUCATION COURSE , 2000 .

[2]  Margaret L. Rice,et al.  A Comparison of Student Outcomes & Satisfaction between Traditional & Web Based Course Offerings , 2002 .

[3]  A. P. Rovai,et al.  Blended Learning and Sense of Community: A Comparative Analysis with Traditional and Fully Online Graduate Courses , 2004 .

[4]  Gerda Mihhailova,et al.  E-learning as internationalization strategy in higher education: Lecturer’s and student’s perspective , 2006 .

[5]  Charles D. Dziuban,et al.  Evaluating Distributed Learning In Metropolitan Universities , 2001 .

[6]  John A. Centra,et al.  Reflective Faculty Evaluation: Enhancing Teaching and Determining Faculty Effectiveness. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1993 .

[7]  L. Harasim.  Shift happens: online education as a new paradigm in learning , 2000, Internet High. Educ..

[8]  Sharon W. Tabor,et al.  Narrowing the Distance: Implementing a Hybrid Learning Model for Information Security Education , 2007 .

[9]  Margie Martyn,et al.  The Hybrid Online Model: Good Practice , 2003 .

[10]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Designing for blended learning, sharing and reuse , 2007 .

[11]  David J. Karber.  Comparisons and Contrasts in Traditional Versus On-Line Teaching in Management , 2001 .

[12]  M. Allen,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Distance Learning: A Comparison Using Meta-Analysis , 2004 .

[13]  Sarah Carr.  As Distance Education Comes of Age, the Challenge Is Keeping the Students. , 2000 .

[14]  Alvin Y. Wang,et al.  A Discourse Analysis of Online Classroom Chats: Predictors of Cyber-Student Performance , 2001 .

[15]  Alvin Y. Wang,et al.  Integrating Technology and Pedagogy: Web Instruction and Seven Principles of Undergraduate Education , 2002 .

[16]  Cathy Owens Swift,et al.  New Horizons in Distance Education: The Online Learner-Centered Marketing Class , 2001 .

[17]  Miky Ronen,et al.  Double blending: online theory with on‐campus practice in photography instruction , 2008 .

[18]  Scott L. Althaus.  Please Scroll down for Article Communication Education Computer-mediated Communication in the University Classroom: an Experiment with On-line Discussions , 2022 .

[19]  S. Simmons.  Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness , 1996 .

[20]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  On the epistemic value of photographs , 2004 .