Deonance and Distrust: Motivated Third Party Information Seeking Following Disclosure of an Agent’s Unethical Behavior

This article explores the hypothesis that third parties are motivated to seek information about agents who have behaved unethically in the past, even if the agent and available information are irrelevant to the third parties’ goals and interests. We explored two possible motives for this information seeking behavior: deonance, or the motive to care about ethics and justice simply for the sake of ethics and justice, and distrust-based threat monitoring. Participants in a consumer decision task were found to seek out information about an agent who had behaved unethically even when the agent was explicitly excluded from the task; there were no intentions to purchase from the agent; performance expectations for the agent’s product were low; the information that could be sought was non-diagnostic, redundant or irrelevant to an ethical judgment; and alternatives in the market offered as good or better value as the unethical agent. Critically, this information seeking took place even when the observer could disengage from and was not vulnerable to the agent. The findings are discussed in terms of third party information seeking and its effects on ethical behavior in the marketplace.

[1]  Herbert Gintis,et al.  The genetic side of gene-culture coevolution: internalization of norms and prosocial emotions , 2004 .

[2]  R. Petty,et al.  Source Attributions and Persuasion: Perceived Honesty as a Determinant of Message Scrutiny , 1995 .

[3]  John Tooby,et al.  Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, part I: Theoretical considerations , 1989 .

[4]  D. Wentura,et al.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[6]  L. Cosmides.  The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task , 1989, Cognition.

[7]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Robert Folger,et al.  Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. , 2001 .

[9]  E. Harmon-Jones.  Anger and the behavioral approach system , 2003 .

[10]  D. Kahneman,et al.  CHAPTER EIGHT. Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market , 2004 .

[11]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Paranoid Cognition in Social Systems: Thinking and Acting in the Shadow of Doubt , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[12]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge , 2022 .

[13]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[14]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, part II: Case study: A computational theory of social exchange , 1989 .

[15]  E. Sober,et al.  Summary of: ‘Unto Others. The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior' , 1998 .

[16]  C. Carver,et al.  Anger is an approach-related affect: evidence and implications. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  William I. Norton,et al.  Fostering Creativity and Innovation without Encouraging Unethical Behavior , 2008 .

[18]  Joan E. Ricart,et al.  Ethical Managerial Behaviour as an Antecedent of Organizational Social Capital , 2008 .

[19]  Anna M. Cianci,et al.  The Effects of Management’s Preannouncement Strategies on Investors’ Judgments of the Trustworthiness of Management , 2008 .

[20]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[21]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[22]  Steven E. Kaplan,et al.  Impact of Post-restatement Actions Taken by a Firm on Non-professional Investors’ Credibility Perceptions , 2008 .

[23]  R. Folger,et al.  What Is the Relationship Between Justice and Morality , 2005 .

[24]  O. John,et al.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  M. Friedman,et al.  Consumer Boycotts: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda , 1991 .

[26]  R. M. Hare,et al.  Norm and Action: A Logical Enquiry. , 1965 .

[27]  Linda L. Price,et al.  The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. , 1987 .

[28]  Mary Lyn Stoll.  Boycott Basics: Moral Guidelines for Corporate Decision Making , 2009 .

[29]  K. Mogg,et al.  Orienting of Attention to Threatening Facial Expressions Presented under Conditions of Restricted Awareness , 1999 .

[30]  J. Swait,et al.  Brand Credibility, Brand Consideration, and Choice , 2004 .

[31]  Karen L. Middleton,et al.  Ethical Decision-Making by Consumers: The Roles of Product Harm and Consumer Vulnerability , 2007 .

[32]  J. Eastwood,et al.  Individuals with social phobia are biased to become aware of negative faces , 2005 .

[33]  D. Phillips,et al.  Child Care as an Adult Work Environment , 1991 .

[34]  Kristine M. Kuhn,et al.  Modeling certainty equivalents for imprecise gambles , 2002 .

[35]  Mohamed Hanafi,et al.  Organizational Isomorphism and Corruption in Financial Institutions: Empirical Research in Emerging Countries , 2008 .

[36]  C. Heath,et al.  Emotional Selection in Memes : The Case of Urban Legends Chip Heath , 2004 .

[37]  C. Heath,et al.  Do People Prefer to Pass Along Good or Bad News? Valence and Relevance of News as Predictors of Transmission Propensity , 1996, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[38]  Carol T. Kulik,et al.  THIRD-PARTY REACTIONS TO EMPLOYEE (MIS)TREATMENT: A JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE , 2004 .

[39]  O. Lourenço.  The aretaic domain and its relation to the deontic domain in moral reasoning. , 2000, New directions for child and adolescent development.

[40]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Handbook of Emotions , 1993 .

[41]  David M. Wasieleski,et al.  Breaking the Rules: Examining the Facilitation Effects of Moral Intensity Characteristics on the Recognition of Rule Violations , 2008 .

[42]  H. Jo,et al.  Ethics and Disclosure: A Study of the Financial Performance of Firms in the Seasoned Equity Offerings Market , 2008 .

[43]  Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified Stroop task. , 2000 .

[44]  Sergio Román.  The Ethics of Online Retailing: A Scale Development and Validation from the Consumers’ Perspective , 2007 .

[45]  Brian P. Meier,et al.  Bring it on: angry facial expressions potentiate approach-motivated motor behavior. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  Arne Öhman,et al.  Fear and anxiety as emotional phenomena: Clinical phenomenology, evolutionary perspectives, and information-processing mechanisms. , 1993 .

[47]  Darren W. Dahl,et al.  Deliberative and Automatic Bases of Suspicion: Empirical Evidence of the Sinister Attribution Error , 2007 .

[48]  C. Palmer,et al.  Ethics and Practice , 1999 .

[49]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Advances in Organizational Justice , 2001 .

[50]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Trust And Distrust: New Relationships and Realities , 1998 .

[51]  Elizabeth E. Umphress,et al.  Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness , 2002 .

[52]  J. Edwards.  The Past, Present, and Future of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2002 .

[53]  Chong Ju Choi,et al.  Consumer Trust, Social Marketing and Ethics of Welfare Exchange , 2007 .

[54]  Marshall Schminke,et al.  Managerial Ethics: Moral Management of People and Processes , 1998 .

[55]  R. Folger.  Fairness as Moral Virtue , 1998 .

[56]  Brian W. Kulik,et al.  Do Competitive Environments Lead to the Rise and Spread of Unethical Behavior? Parallels from Enron , 2008 .

[57]  R. Folger,et al.  Deontic justice: the role of moral principles in workplace fairness , 2003 .

[58]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Justice , 2005 .