Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach.

PURPOSE To design a computer-aided detection (CADe) system for clustered microcalcifications in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) volumes and to perform a preliminary evaluation of the CADe system. METHODS IRB approval and informed consent were obtained in this study. A data set of two-view DBT of 72 breasts containing microcalcification clusters was collected from 72 subjects who were scheduled to undergo breast biopsy. Based on tissue sampling results, 17 cases had breast cancer and 55 were benign. A separate data set of two-view DBT of 38 breasts free of clustered microcalcifications from 38 subjects was collected to independently estimate the number of false-positives (FPs) generated by the CADe system. A radiologist experienced in breast imaging marked the biopsied cluster of microcalcifications with a 3D bounding box using all available clinical and imaging information. A CADe system was designed to detect microcalcification clusters in the reconstructed volume. The system consisted of prescreening, clustering, and false-positive reduction stages. In the prescreening stage, the conspicuity of microcalcification-like objects was increased by an enhancement-modulated 3D calcification response function. An iterative thresholding and 3D object growing method was used to detect cluster seed objects, which were used as potential centers of microcalcification clusters. In the cluster detection stage, microcalcification candidates were identified using a second iterative thresholding procedure, which was applied to the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) enhanced image voxels with a positive calcification response. Starting with each cluster seed object as the initial cluster center, a dynamic clustering algorithm formed a cluster candidate by including microcalcification candidates within a 3D neighborhood of the cluster seed object that satisfied the clustering criteria. The number, size, and SNR of the microcalcifications in a cluster candidate and the cluster shape were used to reduce the number of FPs. RESULTS The prescreening stage detected a cluster seed object in 94% of the biopsied microcalcification clusters at a threshold of 100 cluster seed objects per DBT volume. After clustering, the detection sensitivity was 90% at 15 marks per DBT volume. After FP reduction, at 85% sensitivity, the average number of FPs estimated using the data set containing microcalcification clusters was 3.8 per DBT volume, and that estimated using the data set free of microcalcification clusters was 3.4. The detection performance for malignant microcalcification clusters was superior to that for benign clusters. CONCLUSIONS Our study indicates the feasibility of the 3D approach to the detection of clustered microcalcifications in DBT and that the newly designed enhancement-modulated 3D calcification response function is promising for prescreening. Further work is needed to assess the generalizability of our approach and to improve its performance.

[1]  Luisa P. Wallace,et al.  Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  C J D'Orsi,et al.  Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[3]  Jonathan H Sunshine,et al.  How widely is computer-aided detection used in screening and diagnostic mammography? , 2010, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[4]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Pulmonary nodule registration in serial CT scans based on rib anatomy and nodule template matching. , 2007, Medical physics.

[5]  David Gur,et al.  Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: preliminary experience. , 2005, Radiology.

[7]  Xiaochuan Pan,et al.  Enhanced imaging of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis through improved image-reconstruction algorithms. , 2009, Medical physics.

[8]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Joint two-view information for computerized detection of microcalcifications on mammograms. , 2006, Medical physics.

[9]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images. , 2006, Medical physics.

[10]  K L Lam,et al.  Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network. , 1995, Medical physics.

[11]  M. Gromet.  Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  Stefano Ciatto,et al.  Does computer-aided detection (CAD) contribute to the performance of digital mammography in a self-referred population? , 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[13]  Ying Chen,et al.  Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications. , 2007, Medical physics.

[14]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Tissue Classification Based on 3D Local Intensity Structures for Volume Rendering , 2000, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[15]  Debra M Ikeda,et al.  Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. , 2005, Radiology.

[16]  David Gur,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Gisella Gennaro,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study , 2010, European Radiology.

[18]  Serge Muller,et al.  Computer-Aided Microcalcification Detection on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Data: A Preliminary Evaluation , 2008, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[19]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial. , 2004, Radiology.

[21]  Adam Huang,et al.  On Concise 3-D Simple Point Characterizations: A Marching Cubes Paradigm , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches. , 2008, Medical physics.

[23]  David Gur,et al.  Applying a 2D based CAD scheme for detecting micro-calcification clusters using digital breast tomosynthesis images: an assessment , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[24]  K Doi,et al.  Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[25]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized Detection of Mass Lesions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images Using Two- and Three Dimensional Radial Gradient Index Segmentation , 2004, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[26]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings , 2008, European Radiology.

[27]  Tor D Tosteson,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Automated breast mass detection in 3D reconstructed tomosynthesis volumes: a featureless approach. , 2008, Medical physics.

[29]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Selective-diffusion regularization for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction. , 2010, Medical physics.

[30]  T. Freer,et al.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. , 2001, Radiology.

[31]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[32]  Andrew P. Smith,et al.  Clinical Performance of Breast Tomosynthesis as a Function of Radiologist Experience Level , 2008, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[33]  Tao Wu,et al.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis. , 2004, Medical physics.

[34]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms. , 2006, Medical physics.

[35]  Christina Ilvento,et al.  Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[36]  D. Kopans,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[37]  Qiang Li,et al.  Selective enhancement filters for nodules, vessels, and airway walls in two- and three-dimensional CT scans. , 2003, Medical physics.

[38]  KathleenR. Brandt,et al.  Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection--prospective evaluation. , 2006, Radiology.

[39]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  R A Schmidt,et al.  Automated detection of microcalcification clusters for digital breast tomosynthesis using projection data only: a preliminary study. , 2008, Medical physics.