Do syllable-specific tonal probabilities guide lexical access? Evidence from Mandarin, Shanghai and Cantonese speakers

An eye-tracking study investigated how the interaction between syllable frequency and syllable-specific tonal probability guides online lexical access in speakers of mutually unintelligible Chinese dialects with three disparate tonal systems. Mono-dialectal Mandarin speakers, bi-dialectal Shanghai–Mandarin speakers and bi-dialectal Cantonese–Mandarin speakers searched for target Mandarin syllable–tone combinations while their eye movements and mouse clicks were recorded. The results showed dialectal differences in online eye fixation patterns but not in offline mouse responses. For all groups, mouse clicks were fastest for infrequent syllables with most probable tones and slowest for infrequent syllables with least probable tones. In online eye movement responses, only mono-dialectal Mandarin speakers showed an interaction between syllable frequency and tonal probability. Mono-dialectal Mandarin speakers’ fixations were fastest for infrequent syllables with probable tones and slowest for infrequent syllables with improbable tones. Mono-dialectal speakers also showed a greater amount of competition from the more probable segmental competitor when hearing improbable tones. Bi-dialectal speakers showed different timing in their integration of tonal probabilities. These findings suggest that highly bilingual speakers track and use Mandarin tonal probabilities, but their sensitivity to L2 tonal information may lag behind monolinguals for online word recognition.

[1]  San Duanmu,et al.  The Phonology of Standard Chinese , 2001 .

[2]  Robert S. Bauer,et al.  Modern Cantonese Phonology , 1997 .

[3]  Xi Chen,et al.  Phonological Awareness of Bilingual and Monolingual Chinese Children , 2004 .

[4]  A. Cutler.  Forbear is a Homophone: Lexical Prosody Does Not Constrain Lexical Access , 1986 .

[5]  J. Ohala,et al.  Phonetic Explanations for the Development of Tones , 1979 .

[6]  C. Gussenhoven.  The phonology of tone and intonation , 2004 .

[7]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[8]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Words, Morphemes, and Syllables in the Chinese Mental Lexicon. , 1994 .

[9]  Jeffrey G Malins,et al.  The roles of tonal and segmental information in Mandarin spoken word recognition: An eyetracking study , 2010 .

[10]  Ping Chen,et al.  Modern Chinese: History and Sociolinguistics , 1999 .

[11]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  J. Packard.  The Morphology of Chinese: A Linguistic and Cognitive Approach , 2000 .

[13]  D. Pisoni,et al.  The Handbook of Speech Perception , 2004 .

[14]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[15]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Development of Phonological Awareness in Bilingual Chinese Children , 2008, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[16]  Katharina Wagner.  Register Here for Full Access to Compendium Of Phonetics In Ancient And , 2016 .

[17]  Allan R. James,et al.  Second Language Speech , 1995 .

[18]  Jingjing Guo,et al.  Time course of Chinese monosyllabic spoken word recognition: Evidence from ERP analyses , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Yiya Chen,et al.  How does phonology guide phonetics in segment-f0 interaction? , 2011, J. Phonetics.

[20]  Timothy M. Gann,et al.  Anticipatory baseline effects and information integration in visual world studies. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[21]  Marc F. Joanisse,et al.  Setting the tone: An ERP investigation of the influences of phonological similarity on spoken word recognition in Mandarin Chinese , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  K. Rayner,et al.  On-line perception of Mandarin Tones 2 and 3: evidence from eye movements. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese Word and Character Frequencies Based on Film Subtitles , 2010, PloS one.

[24]  San Duanmu,et al.  Metrical Structure and Tone: Evidence from Mandarin and Shanghai , 1999 .

[25]  D. Norris,et al.  Shortlist B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. , 2008, Psychological review.

[26]  Douglas A. Vakoch,et al.  Tone perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: A cross-linguistic comparison , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[27]  A. Cutler,et al.  Voornaam is not (really) a Homophone: Lexical Prosody and Lexical Access in Dutch , 2001, Language and speech.

[28]  Jerome L. Packard,et al.  Lexical Access in Chinese Speech Comprehension and Production , 1999, Brain and Language.

[29]  Emily Q. Wang,et al.  Pitch targets and their realization: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese , 2001, Speech Commun..

[30]  Cynthia M. Connine,et al.  Processing Spoken Chinese: The Role of Tone Information , 1999 .

[31]  San Duanmu.  Syllable Structure: The Limits of Variation , 2008 .

[32]  A Cutler,et al.  The strong/weak syllable distinction in English. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Aichen T. Ho.  The Acoustic Variation of Mandarin Tones , 1976 .

[34]  Katherine Whalley.  Setting the tone , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[35]  Corinne B. Moore,et al.  The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics: Perception and production of Mandarin Chinese tones , 2006 .

[36]  Patrizia Tabossi,et al.  Lexical Stress Effects in Italian Spoken Word Recognition , 2005 .

[37]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[38]  Larry M. Hyman,et al.  Theoretical aspects of Bantu tone , 1998 .

[39]  D Norris,et al.  Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[40]  Jack Gandour,et al.  Tone perception in Far Eastern languages. , 1983 .

[41]  The Morphology of Chinese: A Linguistic and Cognitive Approach (review) , 2002 .

[42]  D. Barr.  Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression , 2008 .

[43]  M. Yip.  Tone: African languages , 2002 .

[44]  A. Cutler,et al.  Constraints of Lexical Stress on Lexical Access in English: Evidence from Native and Non-native Listeners , 2002, Language and speech.

[45]  David C. S. Li,et al.  CHINESE AS A LINGUA FRANCA IN GREATER CHINA , 2006, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[46]  趙 元任,et al.  A grammar of spoken Chinese = 中國話的文法 , 1968 .

[47]  D. Norris.  Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.

[48]  Bernhard Karlgren,et al.  Compendium of Phonetics in Ancient and Archaic Chinese , 2001 .

[49]  A. Samuel,et al.  The Perception and Representation of Segmental and Prosodic Mandarin Contrasts in Native Speakers of Cantonese. , 2012, Journal of memory and language.

[50]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[51]  D. Dahan,et al.  Talker adaptation in speech perception: Adjusting the signal or the representations? , 2008, Cognition.

[52]  Chao-Yang Lee,et al.  Does Horse Activate Mother? Processing Lexical Tone in Form Priming , 2007, Language and speech.

[53]  Thorsten Jantschek.  Type and token , 2017 .

[54]  K. Boff,et al.  Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[55]  W. Strange.  Speech perception and linguistic experience : issues in cross-language research , 1995 .

[56]  David C. S. Li,et al.  Bilingualism in East Asia , 2008 .

[57]  S. Soto-Faraco,et al.  Journal of Memory and Language , 2001 .

[58]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Morphological Structure in the Chinese Mental Lexicon , 1995 .

[59]  Hsuan-Chih Chen,et al.  Brain Responses to Segmentally and Tonally Induced Semantic Violations in Cantonese , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  Michael K Tanenhaus,et al.  Tracking the time course of orthographic information in spoken-word recognition. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[61]  John Goldsmith,et al.  Autosegmental Studies in Bantu Tone , 1984 .

[62]  J. Howie.  Acoustical Studies of Mandarin Vowels and Tones , 1976 .

[63]  A. Cutler,et al.  Lexical tone in Cantonese spoken-word processing , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[64]  Malte C. Viebahn,et al.  Tracking recognition of spoken words by tracking looks to printed words , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[65]  Sam-Po Law,et al.  Type and token frequencies of phonological units in Hong Kong Cantonese , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[66]  John J. Dreher,et al.  Instrumental investigation of single and paired Mandarin tonemes , 1966 .

[67]  Ping Li,et al.  Word naming and psycholinguistic norms: Chinese , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[68]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  Who Do You Love, Your Mother or Your Horse? An Event-Related Brain Potential Analysis of Tone Processing in Mandarin Chinese , 2004, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[69]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Consequences of lexical stress on learning an artificial lexicon. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[70]  Simone Sulpizio,et al.  Italians use abstract knowledge about lexical stress during spoken-word recognition , 2012 .

[71]  Keith Johnson,et al.  Language Specificity in Speech Perception: Perception of Mandarin Tones by Native and Nonnative Listeners , 2011, Phonetica.

[72]  Denis Burnham,et al.  CATEGORICAL PERCEPTION OF LEXICAL TONE BY TONAL AND NON-TONAL LANGUAGE SPEAKERS , 2002 .

[73]  Hong Kong,et al.  Cross-linguistic and Inter-dialectal Differences in Tone Perception by Native Speakers of Three Chinese Dialects and American English 0. Introduction , 2022 .