Hemispheric Asymmetry in the Remapping and Maintenance of Visual Saliency Maps: A TMS Study

Parietal cortex has been implicated in the updating, after eye movements, of a salience map that is required for coherent visual experience and for the control of visually guided behavior. The current experiment investigated whether TMS over anterior intraparietal cortex (AIPCx), just after a saccade, would affect the ability to update and maintain a salience map. In order to generate a salience map, we employed a paradigm in which an uninformative cue was presented at one object in a display to generate inhibition of return (IOR)—an inhibitory tag that renders the cued object less salient than others in the display, and that slows subsequent responses to visual transients at its location. Following the cue, participants made a saccade to either left or right, and we then probed for updating of the location of IOR by measuring manual reaction time to targets appearing at cued location of the cued compared to an uncued object. Between the time of saccade initiation and target appearance, dual-pulse TMS was targeted over right (Experiment 1) or left AIPCx (Experiment 2), and a vertex control side. Updating of the location of IOR was eliminated by TMS over right, but not the left, AIPCx, suggesting that right parietal cortex is involved in the remapping of IOR. Remapping was eliminated by right AIPCx, regardless of whether the saccade was made to the left (contralateral), or right (ipsilateral) visual field, and regardless of which field the target appeared in. We conclude that right AIPCx is the neural substrate for maintaining a salience map across saccades, and not simply for propagating an efference copy of saccade commands.

[1]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Saccadic dysmetria in a patient with a right frontoparietal lesion. The importance of corollary discharge for accurate spatial behaviour. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Cerebral Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr357 Higher Level Visual Cortex Represents Retinotopic, Not Spatiotopic, Object Location , 2011 .

[3]  W. Heide,et al.  Combined deficits of saccades and visuo-spatial orientation after cortical lesions , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  Christopher D Chambers,et al.  Parietal stimulation destabilizes spatial updating across saccadic eye movements , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  J Douglas Crawford,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over Posterior Parietal Cortex Disrupts Transsaccadic Memory of Multiple Objects , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Christian Bellebaum,et al.  Post-saccadic updating of visual space in the posterior parietal cortex in humans , 2005, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  C. Genovese,et al.  Spatial Updating in Human Parietal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[8]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[9]  Tony Ro,et al.  Maintenance of Visual Stability in the Human Posterior Parietal Cortex , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Spatial processing in the monkey frontal eye field. I. Predictive visual responses. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Z. Kapoula,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the posterior parietal cortex delays the latency of both isolated and combined vergence–saccade movements in humans , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  E. Maylor,et al.  Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  L Pisella,et al.  Right-hemispheric dominance for visual remapping in humans , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  W. Heide,et al.  Cortical control of double‐step saccades: Implications for spatial orientation , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[16]  René Müri,et al.  Craniotopic updating of visual space across saccades in the human posterior parietal cortex , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Spatial processing in the monkey frontal eye field. II. Memory responses. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  J R Duhamel,et al.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. , 1992, Science.

[19]  M. Posner,et al.  Inhibition of return : Neural basis and function , 1985 .

[20]  Robert H. Wurtz,et al.  Influence of the thalamus on spatial visual processing in frontal cortex , 2006, Nature.

[21]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Brain circuits for the internal monitoring of movements. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[22]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of return , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  R Fendrich,et al.  Inhibitory tagging of locations in the blind field of hemianopic patients. , 1997, Consciousness and cognition.

[24]  T. Vilis,et al.  Remapping the remembered target location for anti-saccades in human posterior parietal cortex. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search , 1988, Nature.

[26]  T. Vilis,et al.  Gaze-Centered Updating of Visual Space in Human Parietal Cortex , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Kae Nakamura,et al.  Updating of the visual representation in monkey striate and extrastriate cortex during saccades , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  L. Pisella,et al.  [Balint syndrome and spatial functions of the parietal lobe]. , 2012, Revue neurologique.

[29]  Michel Thiebaut de Schotten,et al.  Cortical control of inhibition of return: Evidence from patients with inferior parietal damage and visual neglect , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  M. Goldberg,et al.  The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex , 1998, Nature.

[31]  Chuan Yi Tang,et al.  A 2.|E|-Bit Distributed Algorithm for the Directed Euler Trail Problem , 1993, Inf. Process. Lett..

[32]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Parietal Lobe Lesions Disrupt Saccadic Remapping of Inhibitory Location Tagging , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  T. Vilis,et al.  Directional selectivity of BOLD activity in human posterior parietal cortex for memory-guided double-step saccades. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Visual attention and stability , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  E. Wassermann.  Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[36]  Julie D. Golomb,et al.  Attention doesn’t slide: spatiotopic updating after eye movements instantiates a new, discrete attentional locus , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[37]  C. Colby,et al.  Spatial updating in area LIP is independent of saccade direction. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  D. Mackay.  Visual stability. , 1972, Investigative ophthalmology.

[39]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Neurons in the monkey superior colliculus predict the visual result of impending saccadic eye movements. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  E. Wassermann,et al.  A safety screening questionnaire for transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[41]  S. Tipper,et al.  Long-Term Inhibition of Return of Attention , 2003, Psychological science.

[42]  Olivier A. Coubard,et al.  Role of the Posterior Parietal Cortex in the Initiation of Saccades and Vergence: Right/Left Functional Asymmetry , 2005, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[43]  M Hallett,et al.  Safety of different inter-train intervals for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and recommendations for safe ranges of stimulation parameters. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.