Negative afterimages and photopic luminance adaptation in human vision.

Previous studies of the negative afterimage have reported that the process responsible for these aftereffects has a bandpass spatial characteristic. If this finding is correct, then negative afterimages cannot arise from a simple, local, adaptive process. I remeasure the spatial-frequency characteristic of the negative-afterimage process by using an afterimage contrast-matching procedure with retinally stabilized stimuli and find the spatial characteristic to be constant in the low-spatial-frequency region. This finding is consistent with the theory that the negative afterimage results from local luminance adaptation. As a test of the local adaptation explanation of the negative afterimage, the effect of the negative afterimage on the temporal contrast-sensitivity function (CSF) (measured down to 0.062 Hz) is determined. The apparent contrasts of the negative afterimages associated with very slowly (less than 0.5 Hz) flickering, threshold-contrast stimuli are calculated from power-function descriptions of the temporal development of the negative afterimage, and these afterimage contrasts are then subtracted from the temporal CSF's. The resulting curves are constant for temporal frequencies below 1 Hz, indicating that the decline in sensitivity at lower temporal frequencies is due entirely to the negative-afterimage process. Both the spatial and the temporal characteristics of the negative-afterimage process are consistent with its being a component of local luminance adaptation.

[1]  D. H. Kelly Visual Contrast Sensitivity , 1977 .

[2]  U. Tulunay-Keesey,et al.  Fading of stabilized retinal images. , 1982, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[3]  B. H. Crawford Visual adaptation in relation to brief conditioning stimuli , 1947, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[4]  R. W. Ditchburn,et al.  Perception of structure in flashes and in afterimages. , 1973, Vision research.

[5]  C. A. Burbeck,et al.  Role of local adaptation in the fading of stabilized images. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  H. D. Baker,et al.  Initial stages of dark and light adaptation. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  Thomas R. Corwin,et al.  Images and afterimages of sinusoidal gratings , 1976, Vision Research.

[8]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Stimulus specificity in the human visual system. , 1973, Vision research.

[9]  G. Westheimer Spatial interaction in human cone vision , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Chapter 9 Visual adaptation and retinal gain controls , 1984 .

[11]  R. Blake,et al.  Role of threshold in afterimage visibility. , 1982, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[12]  H D Crane,et al.  Three-dimensional visual stimulus deflector. , 1978, Applied optics.

[13]  D H Kelly,et al.  Eliminating transient artifacts in stabilized-image contrast thresholds. , 1982, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[14]  W. Geisler Mechanisms of visual sensitivity: Backgrounds and early dark adaptation , 1983, Vision Research.

[15]  R M BOYNTON,et al.  On responses in the human visual system as a function of adaptation level. , 1957, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[16]  Area effects and the rapid threshold decrease in early dark adaptation. , 1973, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[17]  G. B. Wetherill,et al.  SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION. , 1965, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[18]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Contrast enhancement and the negative afterimage. , 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America.