Improving quality and quantity of contributions: Two models for promoting knowledge exchange with shared databases

Shared databases are used for knowledge exchange in groups. Whether a person is willing to contribute knowledge to a shared database presents a social dilemma: Each group member saves time and energy by not contributing any information to the database and by using the database only to retrieve information which was contributed by others. But if all people use this strategy, then the database will be empty and, hence, useless for every group member. Based on theoretical approaches, two models for fostering the information-sharing behavior of database users are presented. One for enhancing the quality of database contents, and one for enhancing the quantity of those contents. The models take into account the following factors: the kinds of rewards the participants obtain for contributing information, the individual costs associated with this contribution, the prospective metaknowledge about the importance of one's own information to the others, and the retrospective metaknowledge about how much others contributed to and retrieved from the database. These factors enhance the quantity of database contents as well as their quality. A highly controlled experimental setting for testing the models is presented. Results of three experiments support some expectations derived from the models. Their implications for organizational and educational settings are discussed.

[1]  Russell Spears,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication, De-Individuation and Group Decision-Making , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[2]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Notification and awareness: synchronizing task-oriented collaborative activity , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[3]  Remo Pareschi,et al.  Information Technology for Knowledge Management , 1998, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[4]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? , 1998 .

[5]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[6]  J. Ledyard.  Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research , 1994 .

[7]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizations and Communication Technology , 1990 .

[8]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Individual participation in organizational information commons: The impact of team level social influence and technology-specific competence , 2005 .

[9]  C. Parks,et al.  Testing Various Types of Cooperation Rewards in Social Dilemmas , 2000 .

[10]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert Roles and Information Exchange during Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What , 1995 .

[11]  Richard M. Bird,et al.  1. Public goods: the polar case , 1972 .

[12]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[13]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[14]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  Ambivalent effect of member portraits in virtual groups , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[15]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[16]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward a “Critical Mass” Theory of Interactive Media , 1987 .

[17]  R. LaRose,et al.  Electronic Bulletin Boards and “Public Goods” Explanations of Collaborative Mass Media , 1993 .

[18]  Hans Spada,et al.  Barriers and Biases in Computer-Mediated Knowledge Communication , 2010 .

[19]  Dale E. Zand.  The Leadership Triad: Knowledge, Trust, and Power , 1996 .

[20]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Connective and Communal Public Goods in Interactive Communication Systems , 1996 .

[21]  J. Flavell.  Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. , 1979 .

[22]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[23]  R. Bird,et al.  Modern fiscal issues : essays in honor of Carl S. Shoup , 1972 .

[24]  S. Komorita,et al.  Components of reward in social dilemmas. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Jürgen Buder,et al.  Wissensaustausch mittels Datenbanken als Öffentliches-Gut-Dilemma , 2003 .

[26]  R. Slavin.  When does cooperative learning increase student achievement , 1983 .

[27]  Jay Liebowitz,et al.  Knowledge Management Handbook , 1999 .

[28]  Angel Cabrera,et al.  Knowledge-Sharing Dilemmas , 2002 .

[29]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Powerful learning environments : unravelling basic components and dimensions , 2003 .

[30]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[31]  Brian K. Thorn,et al.  Discretionary Databases: Theory, Data, and Implications , 1990 .

[32]  Brian K. Thorn,et al.  Discretionary Data Bases , 1987 .

[33]  Friedrich W. Hesse,et al.  Struktur und Verlauf aktiver und passiver Partizipation beim netzbasierten Lernen in virtuellen Seminaren , 1997 .

[34]  A. Porter,et al.  Discretionary databases in forecasting , 1990 .

[35]  Fraser J. M. Reid,et al.  The messaging threshold in computer-mediated communication , 1996 .

[36]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[37]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  Negotiating the Construction of Organisational Memories , 1998, Information Technology for Knowledge Management.

[38]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[39]  Michael E. Kalman.  The effects of organizational commitment and expected outcomes on the motivation to share discretionary information in a collaborative database : communication dilemmas and other serious games , 1999 .

[40]  R. Spears,et al.  Social influence and the influence of the 'social' in computer-mediated communication. , 1992 .

[41]  D. Wegner.  Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[42]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the adoption of interdependent work tools , 1990, CSCW '90.