A critical analysis of intraoperative time utilization in laparoscopic adrenalectomy

Background: Time and efficiency analysis is a technique common in industry that is being applied to surgical procedures. The aim of this study is to analyze the time spent performing the component parts of laparoscopic adrenalectomy by both the lateral transabdominal and the posterior retroperitoneal approaches. Methods: Operational videotapes of 33 patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy (12 lateral, 21 posterior) were reviewed. The operation was divided into six steps: trocar entry, laparoscopic ultrasonography, exposure of the adrenal gland, dissection of the adrenal, extraction of specimen, and irrigation-aspiration. Time spent for each step and the relation with age, gender, body mass index (BMI), tumor size, side, and histology were assessed using Student's t-test, Pearson correlation, and regression analysis. Results: Although tumor size was larger in the lateral compared to the posterior approach (5.5 vs 2.5 cm, p < 0.001), there was no difference between the groups regarding total operating time (116.1 vs 112.8 min). Most of the operating time was spent on dissection of the adrenal gland with both techniques (lateral, 60%; posterior, 66%). Exposure of the adrenal gland was longer in the lateral compared to the posterior approach (15.1 vs 5.8 min, respectively; p < 0.05). In the transabdominal technique, this step was longer on the right side than on the left (18.9 vs 11.4 min, respectively; p < 0.05). In the lateral approach, dissection time was dependent on tumor size (r = 0.90, p < 0.05) but not on BMI, whereas in the posterior approach both tumor size and BMI were positively correlated (r = 0.56 and r = 0.64, respectively). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to apply time analysis techniques to laparoscopic adrenal surgery. Understanding the variables that affect operative time may influence the choice of the surgical approach in a given patient. This study also suggests that efforts to improve operative efficiency are best directed at the dissection of the adrenal.

[1]  T. K. Hunt,et al.  Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: Comparison of the Lateral and Posterior Approaches , 1996 .

[2]  F. Largiadèr,et al.  Laparoscopic ultrasonography during cholecystectomy , 1996, The British journal of surgery.

[3]  R. Crolla,et al.  [Complication rate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy not different for residents in training and surgeons]. , 1997, Nederlandsch tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[4]  W W Hurd,et al.  There's a hole in my bucket: the cost of disposable instruments. , 1997, Fertility and sterility.

[5]  Q. Duh,et al.  Laparoscopic posterior adrenalectomy: technical considerations. , 2000, Archives of surgery.

[6]  L. Swanstrom,et al.  A comparative study of a designated nursing team vs a nontrained team , 1997 .

[7]  S. Rogers,et al.  Comparison of laparoscopic ultrasonography and fluorocholangiography in 300 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[8]  M. Gagner,et al.  Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: lessons learned from 100 consecutive procedures. , 1997, Annals of surgery.

[9]  S. Ozarmağan,et al.  Endoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. , 1995, Surgery.

[10]  D. Jones,et al.  The current management of common bile duct stones. , 1996, Advances in surgery.

[11]  J. Hiatt,et al.  Cost-effective management of complicated choledocholithiasis: laparoscopic transcystic duct exploration or endoscopic sphincterotomy. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[12]  J. Hunter,et al.  Standardizing laparoscopic procedure time and determining the effect of patient age/gender and presence or absence of surgical residents during operation , 1997, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  E. Vaughan Surgical options for open adrenalectomy , 1999, World Journal of Urology.

[14]  D. Hashimoto,et al.  Development of a fogless scope and its analysis using infrared radiation pyrometer , 1997, Surgical Endoscopy.

[15]  J. Barkin,et al.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the procedure of choice for acute cholecystitis. , 1993, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[16]  C. Lo,et al.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. , 1996, Annals of surgery.

[17]  J. Hiatt,et al.  Bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era. Is preoperative sphincterotomy necessary? , 1995, Archives of surgery.

[18]  R. Jones,et al.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. , 1991, Annals of surgery.

[19]  W. Melvin,et al.  Laparoscopic skills enhancement. , 1996, American journal of surgery.

[20]  Cisek Pl,et al.  The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of choledocholithiasis. , 1994, The American surgeon.

[21]  K. Lillemoe,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy. , 1993, American journal of surgery.

[22]  G. Fried,et al.  Cholecystectomy without operative cholangiography. Implications for common bile duct injury and retained common bile duct stones. , 1993, Annals of surgery.

[23]  L W Way,et al.  The ultrasonic dissector facilitates laparoscopic cholecystectomy. , 1992, Archives of surgery.