Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators

Organizational ambidexterity, defined as an organization's ability to be aligned and efficient in its management of today's business demands while simultaneously being adaptive to changes in the environment, has gained increasing interest in recent years. In this article, the authors review various literature streams to develop a comprehensive model that covers research into the antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of organizational ambidexterity. They indicate gaps within and across different research domains and point to important avenues for future research.

[1]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[2]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[3]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[4]  Dale E. Zand Collateral Organization: A New Change Strategy , 1974 .

[5]  K. Weick Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[6]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[8]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[9]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[10]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  Building the Parallel Organization: Creating Mechanisms for Permanent Quality of Work Life , 1980 .

[11]  R. Leifer,et al.  Research Notes. USING SIMULTANEOUS STRUCTURES TO COPE WITH UNCERTAINTY. , 1983 .

[12]  Richard Leifer,et al.  Using Simultaneous Structures to Cope With Uncertainty , 1983 .

[13]  R. J. House,et al.  Organizations: A Quantum View , 1984 .

[14]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation , 1985 .

[15]  S. G. Goldstein,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL DUALISM AND QUALITY CIRCLES , 1985 .

[16]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[17]  P. Shrivastava Is Strategic Management Ideological? , 1986 .

[18]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[19]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[20]  Pasquale Gagliardi,et al.  The Creation and Change of Organizational Cultures: A Conceptual Framework , 1986 .

[21]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Porter's (1980) Generic Strategies and Performance: An Empirical Examination with American Data , 1986 .

[22]  L. Fry,et al.  Congruence, Contingency, and Theory Building , 1987 .

[23]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Tobin's q and the Importance of Focus in Firm Performance , 1988 .

[24]  John C. Narver,et al.  The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability , 1990 .

[25]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications , 1990 .

[26]  Vincent di Norcia Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution , 1991 .

[27]  Marilyn M. Helms,et al.  Generic Strategies and Business Performance: an Empirical Study of the Screw Machine Products Industry , 1991 .

[28]  Robert A. Burgelman Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research , 1991 .

[29]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[30]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[31]  David Lei,et al.  Management practices in learning organizations , 1992 .

[32]  M. Gudim,et al.  Parallel Learning Structures: Increasing Innovation in Bureaucracies , 1992 .

[33]  D. Dougherty Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[34]  Daryl McKee,et al.  An organizational learning approach to product innovation , 1992 .

[35]  B. Golden The past is the past--or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. , 1992, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[36]  D. Leonard-Barton CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[37]  John A. Parnell,et al.  Generic Strategy and Performance: an Empirical Test of the Miles and Snow Typology , 1993 .

[38]  S. Zahra Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: A taxonomic approach , 1993 .

[39]  K. Clark,et al.  Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction☆ , 1993 .

[40]  A. Tsui,et al.  Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[41]  Danny Miller,et al.  THE SIMPLICITY OF COMPETITIVE REPERTOIRES: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS. , 1993 .

[42]  William H. Glick,et al.  Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories , 1993 .

[43]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Strategy as stretch and leverage. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[44]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[45]  P. Ghemawat,et al.  Organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency, The , 1993 .

[46]  Terry L. Amburgey,et al.  As the Left Foot Follows the Right? The Dynamics of Strategic and Structural Change , 1994 .

[47]  Jeffrey D. Ford,et al.  Logics of Identity, Contradiction, and Attraction in Change , 1994 .

[48]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[49]  D. Denison,et al.  Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership , 1995 .

[50]  P. Adler,et al.  Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive , 1996 .

[51]  P. Stonham Diversification, refocusing and economic performance , 1996 .

[52]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  The Evolution of Strategic Simplicity: Exploring Two Models of Organizational Adaption , 1996 .

[53]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[54]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Towards The Flexible Form: How To Remain Vital in Hypercompetitive Environments , 1996 .

[55]  M. Sastry Problems and Paradoxes in a Model of Punctuated Organizational Change , 1997 .

[56]  Daniel A. Levinthal Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[57]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Strategic Renewal in Large Complex Organizations: A Competence Based View , 1997 .

[58]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[59]  J. Parnell New Evidence in the Generic Strategy and Business Performance Debate: A Research Note , 1997 .

[60]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma , 1997 .

[61]  Robert Drazin,et al.  Equifinality: Functional Equivalence in Organization Design , 1997 .

[62]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Dynamics of competence-based competition: Theory and practice in the new strategic management , 1997 .

[63]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[64]  Jeffrey L. Bradach Using the Plural Form in the Management of Restaurant Chains , 1997 .

[65]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Competing by design: the power of organizational architecture , 1998 .

[66]  H. Barkema,et al.  International Expansion Through Start-Up or Acquisition: A Learning Perspective , 1998 .

[67]  Subodh P. Kulkarni,et al.  Winning through Innovation: A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal , 1998 .

[68]  Jeffrey Katz Building the Flexible Firm: How to Remain Competitive , 1998 .

[69]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos , 1998 .

[70]  P. Adler,et al.  Flexibility Versus Efficiency? a Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[71]  A. Pettigrew,et al.  The Temporal Development of Strategy: Patterns in the U.K. Insurance Industry , 1999 .

[72]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Towards the Flexible Form , 1999 .

[73]  Timothy N. Carroll,et al.  The Coevolution of New Organizational Forms , 1999 .

[74]  T. Kostova,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy Under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise , 1999 .

[75]  L. Brouthers,et al.  A Proposed Solution to the Transnational Structure Paradox , 1999 .

[76]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[77]  Michael L. Menefee,et al.  Strategy as a response to organizational uncertainty: an alternative perspective on the strategy‐performance relationship , 2000 .

[78]  Carrie R. Leana,et al.  Stability and Change as Simultaneous Experiences in Organizational Life , 2000 .

[79]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Organizational Identity, Image, and Adaptive Instability , 2000 .

[80]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Strategizing Throughout the Organization: Managing Role Conflict in Strategic Renewal , 2000 .

[81]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Looking Forward and Looking Backward: Cognitive and Experiential Search , 2000 .

[82]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Making the Next Move: How Experiential and Vicarious Learning Shape the Locations of Chains' Acquisitions , 2000 .

[83]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Product Sequencing: Co-Evolution of Knowledge, Capabilities and Products. , 2000 .

[84]  Willow A. Sheremata Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces in Radical New Product Development Under Time Pressure , 2000 .

[85]  Marianne W. Lewis Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide , 2000 .

[86]  K. Eisenhardt Paradox, Spirals, Ambivalence: the New Language of Change and Pluralism , 2000 .

[87]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Time: A New Research Lens , 2001 .

[88]  H. Barkema,et al.  Learning Through Acquisitions , 2001 .

[89]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[90]  J. Ruiz Moreno [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[91]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[92]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[93]  Frans van den Bosch,et al.  Mastering Strategic Renewal: Mobilising Renewal Journeys in Multi-unit Firms , 2001 .

[94]  Robert A. Burgelman Strategy as Vector and the Inertia of Coevolutionary Lock-in , 2002 .

[95]  Adler,et al.  Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system , 1999 .

[96]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies , 2002 .

[97]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  Being Efficiently Fickle: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Choice , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[98]  L. TushmanMichael,et al.  A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation , 2002 .

[99]  Q. Huy Emotional Balancing of Organizational Continuity and Radical Change: The Contribution of Middle Managers , 2002 .

[100]  Chun Wei Choo,et al.  The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge , 2002 .

[101]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[102]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[103]  Erwin Danneels The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[104]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[105]  W. Abernathy Innovation : Mapping the winds of creative destruction * , 2003 .

[106]  A. Lewin,et al.  Co-evolutionary Dynamics Within and Between Firms: From Evolution to Co-evolution , 2003 .

[107]  C. Hill,et al.  The Performance of Incumbent firms in the Face of Radical Technological Innovation , 2003 .

[108]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[109]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[110]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[111]  C. Markides,et al.  Competing with dual business models: A contingency approach , 2004 .

[112]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[113]  C. Moorman,et al.  Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation , 2004 .

[114]  Chris Zook,et al.  Beyond the core : expand your market without abandoning your roots , 2004 .

[115]  Thomas J. Cottrell,et al.  Product Variety and Firm Survival in the Microcomputer Software Industry , 2004 .

[116]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[117]  Jaideep Anand,et al.  Non‐additivity in portfolios of exploration activities: a real options‐based analysis of equity alliances in biotechnology , 2004 .

[118]  Barry A. Colbert,et al.  The Complex Resource-Based View: Implications for Theory and Practice in Strategic Human Resource Management , 2004 .

[119]  M. Tushman,et al.  The ambidextrous organization. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[120]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development , 2004 .

[121]  C. Gilbert Unbundling the Structure of Inertia: Resource Versus Routine Rigidity , 2005 .

[122]  B. Menguc,et al.  Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity , 2005 .

[123]  J. Dutton,et al.  KEEPING AN EYE ON THE MIRROR : IMAGE AND IDENTITY IN ORGANIZATIONAL ADAPTATION , 2005 .

[124]  J. Ebben,et al.  Efficiency, flexibility, or both? Evidence linking strategy to performance in small firms , 2005 .

[125]  Sebastian Raisch,et al.  Organizational Crisis : The Logic of Failure , 2005 .

[126]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Resolving the Capability–Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation , 2005 .

[127]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter? , 2005 .

[128]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Ambidexterity: The Impact of Environmental and Organizational Antecedents , 2005 .

[129]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .

[130]  B. Looy,et al.  Organizing for Continuous Innovation: On the Sustainability of Ambidextrous Organizations , 2005 .

[131]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation , 2006 .

[132]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2006 .

[133]  Giacomo Negro,et al.  Filling Empty Seats: How Status and Organizational Hierarchies Affect Exploration Versus Exploitation in Team Design , 2006 .

[134]  Tom J. M. Mom,et al.  Investigating Managers' Exploration and Exploitation Activities: The Influence of Top-Down, Bottom-Up, and Horizontal Knowledge Inflows , 2006 .

[135]  Wendy K. Smith TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM APPROACHES TO SIMULTANEOUSLY MANAGING EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION. , 2006 .

[136]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[137]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Special Issue: Organizational Design: Organization Design and Effectiveness over the Innovation Life Cycle , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[138]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[139]  Inger G. Stensaker,et al.  Developing capacity for change , 2006 .

[140]  Christine M. Beckman The Influence of Founding Team Company Affiliations on Firm Behavior , 2006 .

[141]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  WHEN EXPLORATION BACKFIRES: UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF MULTILEVEL ORGANIZATIONAL SEARCH , 2006 .

[142]  Georg Schreyögg,et al.  How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization , 2007 .

[143]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[144]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management , 2007 .

[145]  Stewart Thornhill,et al.  Strategic purity: A multi‐industry evaluation of pure vs. hybrid business strategies , 2007 .

[146]  Chi-Hyon Lee,et al.  Strategic Ambidexterity and Sales Growth : A Longitudinal Test in the Software Sector , 2007 .

[147]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[148]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[149]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Strategy-organization configurations in corporate venture units: Impact on performance and survival , 2008 .

[150]  Tomi Laamanen,et al.  Performance of serial acquirers: toward an acquisition program perspective , 2008 .

[151]  Sebastian Raisch,et al.  Shaping the Context for Learning: Corporate Alignment Initiatives, Environmental Munificence and Firm Performance , 2010 .

[152]  Stuart Wall Strategic reconfigurations : building dynamic capabilities in rapid innovation-based industries , 2010 .