How long is the sign?

Abstract This paper deals with the relative empirical length of signs in sign languages and provides evidence for the view that they are actually longer units than has hitherto been recognized. The evidence is presented from two perspectives: those of sign articulation and sign recognition. Concerning sign articulation, it is suggested that signs are longer units than is currently assumed because most of the structural features of signs are in fact already present before the currently accepted beginnings of signs and they continue after signs' generally accepted endings. Concerning sign recognition, the longer view of the sign is proposed on the grounds that the recognition point of signs is typically located before their alleged beginning, and because signs (as currently understood) can also be recognized on the basis of parts of their subsequent transitions only. The nature of the longer sign is discussed together with some more general consequences for sign language research of the revision of our view of what a sign might be.

[1]  Bencie Woll,et al.  The Linguistics of British Sign Language: An Introduction , 1999 .

[2]  F Grosjean,et al.  Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  David M. Perlmutter SONORITY AND SYLLABLE STRUCTURE IN AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE , 1993 .

[4]  Diane Brentari,et al.  A Prosodic Model of Sign Language Phonology , 1999 .

[5]  E. A. Hendriks,et al.  Which Fragments of a Sign Enable Its Recognition? , 2009 .

[6]  Scott K. Liddell,et al.  A Segmental Framework for Representing Signs Phonetically , 2011 .

[7]  Sotaro Kita,et al.  Movement Phase in Signs and Co-Speech Gestures, and Their Transcriptions by Human Coders , 1997, Gesture Workshop.

[8]  Onno Crasborn,et al.  Annotation of video data in the Corpus NGT , 2008 .

[9]  S. Bartley Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982,55, 122. @ Perceptual and Motor Skills 1982 , 1982 .

[10]  Andrea J. van Doorn,et al.  When and how well do people see the onset of gestures , 2007 .

[11]  K. Green Sign Boundaries in American Sign Language , 2013 .

[12]  Scott K. Liddell THINK AND BELIEVE: SEQUENTIALITY IN AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE , 1984 .

[13]  W. Stokoe Sign Language Structure , 1980 .

[14]  Scott K. Liddell,et al.  American Sign Language: The Phonological Base , 2013 .

[15]  W. Sandler A sonority cycle in American Sign Language , 1993, Phonology.

[16]  Tommi Jantunen,et al.  Signs and Transitions: Do They Differ Phonetically and Does It Matter? , 2013 .

[17]  Adam Schembri,et al.  Australian Sign Language: Auslan: An Introduction to Sign Language Linguistics , 2007 .

[18]  K. Emmorey,et al.  Lexical Recognition in Sign Language: Effects of Phonetic Structure and Morphology , 1990, Perceptual and motor skills.

[19]  Woo Hyeok Chang,et al.  On the Relation between Phonetics and Phonology , 2012 .

[20]  W. Sandler Phonological Representation of the Sign: Linearity and Nonlinearity in American Sign Language , 1989 .

[21]  Ulrike Zeshan,et al.  Towards a Notion of ‘Word’ in Sign Languages , 2002 .

[22]  Jorma Laaksonen,et al.  S-pot - a benchmark in spotting signs within continuous signing , 2014, LREC.

[23]  C. Mauk,et al.  Undershoot in two modalities: evidence from fast speech and fast signing , 2003 .

[24]  Lc Day,et al.  Mouthings and Mouth Gestures in British Sign Language , 2001 .

[25]  Stina Ojala,et al.  Towards an Integrative Information Society: Studies on Individuality in Speech and Sign , 2011 .