An Equilibrium Model of Investment in Restructured Electricity Markets

In this paper, we describe a framework modeling for investment in restructured electricity markets. This framework is extremely flexible, and is designed to be able to capture many of the key considerations that distinguish investment in deregulated electricity markets from both investment in regulated markets, and investment in competitive markets for other commodities. The model is composed of two distinct elements: a detailed model of short-run, or ‘spot market’ competition in electricity markets, and a dynamic long-run equilibrium model of investment decisions of firms. The investment choices by firms will be driven by the underlying profits implied by the short-term markets under different investment paths. Firms will choose the investment paths that lead them to more profitable states of short-term markets. We implement the framework for a representative electricity market and several qualitative insights can be demonstrated. First, the incentives of individual firms to invest very much depends upon their position in the market. Second, the impact of market structure on investment incentives is also influenced by the firms’ contractual or retail obligations in the market. Just as long-term contracts or retail obligations change a firm’s incentives in the short-term markets, so do they influence investment decisions. Third, increased uncertainty – in our case in demand growth – can delay investment. This is a demonstration of the option value of waiting for further information before making an irreversible investment.

[1]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Estimating Effective Concentration in Deregulated Wholesale Electricity Markets , 1984 .

[2]  P. Klemperer,et al.  Supply Function Equilibria in Oligopoly under Uncertainty , 1989 .

[3]  R. Green,et al.  Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .

[5]  S. Dirkse,et al.  The path solver: a nommonotone stabilization scheme for mixed complementarity problems , 1995 .

[6]  S. Borenstein,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Potential for Market Power in California&Apos;S Electricity Industry , 1998 .

[7]  Jorge J. Moré,et al.  The NEOS Server , 1998 .

[8]  James Bushnell,et al.  Market Power in Electricity Markets: Beyond Concentration Measures , 1999 .

[9]  R. McAfee,et al.  A Theory of Bilateral Oligopoly , 2000 .

[10]  Ariel Pakes,et al.  A Framework for Applied Dynamic Analysis in I.O , 2000 .

[11]  E. Kahn,et al.  A quantitative analysis of pricing behavior in California's wholesale electricity market during summer 2000 , 2001, 2001 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37262).

[12]  Natalia Fabra,et al.  Price Wars and Collusion in the Spanish Electricity Market , 2005 .

[13]  S. Borenstein,et al.  Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California's Deregulated Electricity Industry , 2002 .

[14]  J. Bushnell,et al.  An Empirical Assessment of the Competitiveness of the New England Electricity Market , 2002 .

[15]  Richard Green,et al.  The Electricity Contract Market in England and Wales , 2003 .

[16]  James Bushnell Looking for Trouble: Competition Policy in the U.S. Electricity Industry , 2003 .

[17]  R. Green,et al.  Why Did British Electricity Prices Fall after 1998 , 2003 .

[18]  Ali Hortacsu,et al.  Testing Strategic Models of Firm Behavior in Restructured Electricity Markets: A Case Study of ERCOT , 2004 .

[19]  James Bushnell,et al.  Vertical Arrangements, Market Structure, and Competition: An Analysis of Restructured U.S. Electricity Markets , 2005 .

[20]  James Bushnell,et al.  Oligopoly equilibria in electricity contract markets , 2005 .

[21]  Erin T. Mansur,et al.  Upstream Competition and Vertical Integration in Electricity Markets , 2007, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[22]  Steven L. Puller Pricing and Firm Conduct in California's Deregulated Electricity Market , 2007, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[23]  Stan ford,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF HEDGE CONTRACTS ON BIDDING BEHAVIOR IN A COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY MARKET * , 2008 .