Reliability and Validity of Clinically Accessible Smart Glove Technologies to Measure Joint Range of Motion

Capturing hand motions for hand function evaluations is essential in the medical field. For many allied health professionals, measuring joint range of motion (ROM) is an important skill. While the universal goniometer (UG) is the most used clinical tool for measuring joint ROM, developments in current sensor technology are providing clinicians with more measurement possibilities than ever. For rehabilitation and manual dexterity evaluations, different data gloves have been developed. However, the reliability and validity of sensor technologies when used within a smart device remain somewhat unclear. This study proposes a novel electronically controlled sensor monitoring system (ECSMS) to obtain the static and dynamic parameters of various sensor technologies for both data gloves and individual sensor evaluation. Similarly, the ECSMS was designed to closely mimic a human finger joint, to have total control over the joint, and to have an exceptionally high precision. In addition, the ECSMS device can closely mimic the movements of the finger from hyperextension to a maximum ROM beyond any person’s finger joint. Due to the modular design, the ECSMS’s sensor monitoring board is independent and extensible to include various technologies for examination. Additionally, by putting these sensory devices through multiple tests, the system accurately measures the characteristics of any rotary/linear sensor in and out of a glove. Moreover, the ECSMS tracks the movement of all types of sensors with respect to the angle values of finger joints. In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of sensory devices, the ECSMS was first validated against a recognised secondary device with an accuracy and resolution of 0.1°. Once validated, the system simultaneously determines real angles alongside the hand monitoring device or sensor. Due to its unique design, the system is independent of the gloves/sensors that were tested and can be used as a gold standard to realise more medical equipment/applications in the future. Consequently, this design greatly enhances testing measures within research contact and even non-contact systems. In conclusion, the ECSMS will benefit in the design of data glove technologies in the future because it provides crucial evidence of sensor characteristics. Similarly, this design greatly enhances the stability and maintainability of sensor assessments by eliminating unwanted errors. These findings provide ample evidence for clinicians to support the use of sensory devices that can calculate joint motion in place of goniometers.

[1]  Kevin Curran,et al.  Review of Wearable Sensor-Based Health Monitoring Glove Devices for Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2021, Sensors.

[2]  L. Bouyer,et al.  Clinicians’ perspectives on inertial measurement units in clinical practice , 2020, PloS one.

[3]  Pei-Ying Chiang,et al.  A Modular Data Glove System for Finger and Hand Motion Capture Based on Inertial Sensors , 2019 .

[4]  Ben Schram,et al.  Reliability and validity of clinically accessible smartphone applications to measure joint range of motion: A systematic review , 2019, PloS one.

[5]  Giorgio De Pasquale,et al.  Glove-based systems for medical applications: review of recent advancements , 2018, Journal of Textile Engineering & Fashion Technology.

[6]  Junghsi Lee,et al.  Design of an Inertial-Sensor-Based Data Glove for Hand Function Evaluation , 2018, Sensors.

[7]  Oleg V. Ivanov,et al.  Fiber-Optic Bend Sensor Based on Double Cladding Fiber , 2015, J. Sensors.

[8]  Susan Gordon,et al.  Reliability and concurrent validity of knee angle measurement: smart phone app versus universal goniometer used by experienced and novice clinicians. , 2014, Manual therapy.

[9]  Olga Troynikov,et al.  Therapy gloves for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a review , 2014, Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease.

[10]  Kevin Curran,et al.  Characteristics of a Piezo-Resistive Fabric Stretch Sensor Glove for Home-Monitoring of Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2014, 2014 11th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks Workshops.

[11]  Alessandro Tognetti,et al.  Exploiting Wearable Goniometer Technology for Motion Sensing Gloves , 2014, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[12]  Clementina D. Mladenova,et al.  New perspective on the gimbal lock problem , 2013 .

[13]  Kevin Curran,et al.  Novel smart sensor glove for arthritis rehabiliation , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Body Sensor Networks.

[14]  G. Saggio,et al.  Shaping Resistive Bend Sensors to Enhance Readout Linearity , 2012 .

[15]  Christoph Waldmann,et al.  Assessment of sensor performance , 2009 .

[16]  P. Myles,et al.  Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. , 2007, British journal of anaesthesia.

[17]  H. Mäkinen,et al.  Is DAS28 an appropriate tool to assess remission in rheumatoid arthritis? , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[18]  Anne Bruton,et al.  A study to compare the reliability of composite finger flexion with goniometry for measurement of range of motion in the hand , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[19]  Debanjan Borthakur QUANTIFYING THE EFFECTS OF MOTOR TASKS ON CORTICOKINEMATIC COHERENCE IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE , 2018 .

[20]  D. Stamatis Measurement System Analysis (MSA) , 2015 .