Rapid Lengthening of Rabbit Mandibular Ramus by Using Nitinol Spring: A Preliminary Study

Nitinol is well known for its shape memory and superelasticity, which means it can return to its original shape from large deflections and produce moderate forces in the process. Based on these characteristics, the authors attempted to use an internal Nitinol spring for automatic lengthening of mandibular ramus. Twenty adult white rabbits underwent transverse osteotomy in unilateral mandibular ramus to remove a 15.0 mm condylar segment and L-osteotomy in remnant ramus to create a vascularized transport disc. The S-shaped Nitinol spring, with two ends bent as perpendicular underprops, was constricted and secured across the transverse gap of L osteotomy by the underprops. Six animals were killed 6 days after operation for observation of bone transport rate. Other surviving rabbits were killed 8 weeks later for morphologic and histologic examination. Mechanical testing revealed moderate output of tensile elasticity by constricted spring on shape recovery in 37°C. Rapid lengthening of mandibular ramus, more than 9.0 mm in 5 to 6 days, and new bone formation in 8 weeks were found. The radiograph and histologic appearance of regenerated bone was similar to those seen with traditional distraction osteogenesis. This preliminary study demonstrates the possibility of spring-mediated rapid mandibular lengthening across an osteotomy. However, the method needs additional scientific investigation for its clinical feasibility.

[1]  H. Yoon,et al.  Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis in facial asymmetry patients with unilateral temporomandibular joint bony ankylosis. , 2002, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[2]  M. Longaker,et al.  Rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis: part III. Gradual distraction versus acute lengthening. , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  T Takato,et al.  Experimental study of reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint using a bone transport technique. , 2000, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[4]  N. Waters Superelastic Nickel-titanium Wires , 1992, British journal of orthodontics.

[5]  G. Swennen,et al.  Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature: Part 1: clinical studies. , 2001, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[6]  A. Ayoub,et al.  Segmental mandibular reconstruction by microincremental automatic distraction osteogenesis: an animal study. , 2001, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[7]  L. Kaban,et al.  Use of ultrasound to assess healing of a mandibular distraction wound. , 2002, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[8]  R. Schmelzeisen,et al.  Distraction osteogenesis in the mandible with a motor-driven plate: a preliminary animal study. , 1996, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[9]  P. Manson,et al.  Spring-Mediated Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis , 2003, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[10]  W. Walsh,et al.  Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a comparison of distraction rates in the rabbit model. , 1998, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[11]  G A Ilizarov,et al.  The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  M. Longaker,et al.  Rat Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis: Latency, Rate, and Rhythm Determine the Adaptive Response , 2001, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[13]  F. Neukam,et al.  The Effects of Magnitude and Frequency of Distraction Forces on Tissue Regeneration in Distraction Osteogenesis of the Mandible , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  G. Swennen,et al.  Cranio-facial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part II: Experimental studies. , 2002, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[15]  J. Glowacki,et al.  Effects of latency and rate on bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction model. , 2000, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[16]  M. Poole,et al.  Distraction Osteogenesis in Craniofacial Surgery: A Review , 1998, Annals of plastic surgery.

[17]  J. Wiltfang,et al.  A new distraction device to compare continuous and discontinuous bone distraction in mini-pigs: a preliminary report. , 2000, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[18]  C. Cutting,et al.  Introduction of an intraoral bone-lengthening device. , 1995, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[19]  T. Takato,et al.  The Histologic Analysis of Distraction Osteogenesis of the Mandible in Rabbits , 1994, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[20]  E Unger,et al.  Mandibular lengthening with an implanted motor-driven device: preliminary study in sheep. , 1999, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[21]  Xing Wang,et al.  [Distraction osteogenesis for treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis]. , 2002, Zhonghua yi xue za zhi.