In addition to shaping social networks, for example, in terms of co-authorship relations, scientific communications induce and reproduce cognitive structures. Scientific literature is intellectually organized in terms of disciplines and specialties; these structures are reproduced and networked reflexively by making references to the authors, concepts and texts embedded in these literatures. The concept of a cognitive structure was introduced in social network analysis (SNA) in 1987 by David Krackhardt, but the focus in SNA has hitherto been on cognition as a psychological attribute of human agency. In bibliometrics, and in science and technology studies (STS) more generally, socio-cognitive structures refer to intellectual organization at the supra-individual level. This intellectual organization emerges and is reproduced by the collectives of authors who are organized not only in terms of inter-personal relations, but also more abstractly in terms of codes of communication that are field-specific. Citations can serve as indicators of this codification process.
[1]
R. Merton.
The Matthew Effect in Science
,
1968,
Science.
[2]
Andrea Bergmann,et al.
Citation Indexing Its Theory And Application In Science Technology And Humanities
,
2016
.
[3]
D J PRICE,et al.
NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS.
,
1965,
Science.
[4]
H. Maibom.
Social Systems
,
2007
.
[5]
Bella Hass Weinberg.
The Earliest Hebrew Citation Indexes
,
1997,
J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[6]
Henk F. Moed,et al.
Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems
,
2004
.
[7]
L. Leydesdorff.
Scientific communication and cognitive codification: Social systems theory and the sociology of scientific knowledge
,
2009
.
[8]
Loet Leydesdorff,et al.
The knowledge-based economy and the triple helix model
,
2012,
Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[9]
Norman P. Hummon,et al.
Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory☆
,
1989
.