Molecular Docking Screens Using Comparative Models of Proteins
暂无分享,去创建一个
Gerhard Klebe | Brian K. Shoichet | Andrej Sali | Ben M. Webb | John J. Irwin | Hao Fan | G. Klebe | A. Sali | J. Irwin | B. Shoichet | Hao Fan
[1] Michael M. Mysinger,et al. Automated Docking Screens: A Feasibility Study , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[2] Luigi Petraccone,et al. Structure-based drug design: from nucleic acid to membrane protein targets. , 2009, Experimental and molecular pathology.
[3] A. Sali,et al. How well can the accuracy of comparative protein structure models be predicted? , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[4] Heidi J Imker,et al. Discovery of a dipeptide epimerase enzymatic function guided by homology modeling and virtual screening. , 2008, Structure.
[5] Holger Gohlke,et al. Target flexibility: an emerging consideration in drug discovery and design. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[6] Béla Noszál,et al. Discovery of novel human histamine H4 receptor ligands by large-scale structure-based virtual screening. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[7] Ola Engkvist,et al. Molecular modeling of the second extracellular loop of G‐protein coupled receptors and its implication on structure‐based virtual screening , 2008, Proteins.
[8] Sebastian Radestock,et al. Homology Model-Based Virtual Screening for GPCR Ligands Using Docking and Target-Biased Scoring , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[9] Mitchell A. Avery,et al. Probing the Structures of Leishmanial Farnesyl Pyrophosphate Synthases: Homology Modeling and Docking Studies , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[10] R. Abagyan,et al. Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.
[11] Ajay N. Jain,et al. Recommendations for evaluation of computational methods , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[12] Daniel L Baker,et al. Virtual screening approaches for the identification of non-lipid autotaxin inhibitors. , 2008, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.
[13] Ruben Abagyan,et al. Discovery of small molecule inhibitors of ubiquitin-like poxvirus proteinase I7L using homology modeling and covalent docking approaches , 2007, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[14] M. Taha,et al. Combining docking, scoring and molecular field analyses to probe influenza neuraminidase-ligand interactions. , 2007, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[15] Heidi J. Imker,et al. Prediction and assignment of function for a divergent N-succinyl amino acid racemase. , 2007, Nature chemical biology.
[16] Jinfeng Liu,et al. Novel leverage of structural genomics , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.
[17] G. Reiser,et al. Structure and ligand-binding site characteristics of the human P2Y11 nucleotide receptor deduced from computational modelling and mutational analysis. , 2007, The Biochemical journal.
[18] Marcin Król,et al. Flexible relaxation of rigid‐body docking solutions , 2007, Proteins.
[19] Junmei Wang,et al. GPCR Structure-Based Virtual Screening Approach for CB2 Antagonist Search , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[20] Heather A Carlson,et al. Exploring experimental sources of multiple protein conformations in structure-based drug design. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[21] Edgar Jacoby,et al. Evaluation of the utility of homology models in high throughput docking , 2007, Journal of molecular modeling.
[22] Marc A. Martí-Renom,et al. DBAli tools: mining the protein structure space , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..
[23] J. Irwin,et al. Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[24] Jens Meiler,et al. ROSETTALIGAND: Protein–small molecule docking with full side‐chain flexibility , 2006, Proteins.
[25] A. Sali,et al. Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[26] Olivier Sperandio,et al. Receptor-based computational screening of compound databases: the main docking-scoring engines. , 2006, Current protein & peptide science.
[27] Adrian H Elcock,et al. Structure selection for protein kinase docking and virtual screening: homology models or crystal structures? , 2006, Current protein & peptide science.
[28] David M. Ferguson,et al. A combined ligand-based and target-based drug design approach for G-protein coupled receptors: application to salvinorin A, a selective kappa opioid receptor agonist , 2006, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[29] Rick Gussio,et al. Homology model of RSK2 N-terminal kinase domain, structure-based identification of novel RSK2 inhibitors, and preliminary common pharmacophore. , 2006, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.
[30] Ulrich Rester,et al. Dock around the Clock – Current Status of Small Molecule Docking and Scoring , 2006 .
[31] G. Klebe. Virtual ligand screening: strategies, perspectives and limitations , 2006, Drug Discovery Today.
[32] Miklos Feher,et al. Consensus scoring for protein-ligand interactions. , 2006, Drug discovery today.
[33] Chris Oostenbrink,et al. Catalytic site prediction and virtual screening of cytochrome P450 2D6 substrates by consideration of water and rescoring in automated docking. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[34] S. Moro,et al. Novel strategies for the design of new potent and selective human A3 receptor antagonists: an update. , 2006, Current medicinal chemistry.
[35] R. Friesner,et al. Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[36] M. Nowak,et al. Homology modeling of the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor using automated docking of bioactive compounds with defined geometry. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[37] J Andrew McCammon,et al. Target flexibility in molecular recognition. , 2005, Biochimica et biophysica acta.
[38] Marc A. Martí-Renom,et al. MODBASE: a database of annotated comparative protein structure models and associated resources , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[39] Steven E Brenner,et al. The Impact of Structural Genomics: Expectations and Outcomes , 2005, Science.
[40] J Andrew McCammon,et al. Molecular docking of balanol to dynamics snapshots of protein kinase A , 2005, Proteins.
[41] A. Caflisch,et al. Functional Plasticity in the Substrate Binding Site of β-Secretase , 2005 .
[42] Timothy M Willson,et al. A Ligand-mediated Hydrogen Bond Network Required for the Activation of the Mineralocorticoid Receptor*[boxs] , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[43] C. Lyttle,et al. Molecular and Pharmacological Properties of a Potent and Selective Novel Nonsteroidal Progesterone Receptor Agonist Tanaproget* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[44] C. Camacho,et al. Modeling side‐chains using molecular dynamics improve recognition of binding region in CAPRI targets , 2005, Proteins.
[45] B. Shoichet,et al. Hierarchical docking of databases of multiple ligand conformations. , 2005, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[46] R. Abagyan,et al. Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[47] Dakshanamurthy Sivanesan,et al. In-silico Screening using Flexible Ligand Binding Pockets: A Molecular Dynamics-based Approach , 2005, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[48] Leslie A Kuhn,et al. Side‐chain flexibility in protein–ligand binding: The minimal rotation hypothesis , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[49] T. Klabunde,et al. Structure-based drug discovery using GPCR homology modeling: successful virtual screening for antagonists of the alpha1A adrenergic receptor. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[50] Cathy H. Wu,et al. The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..
[51] Michael K. Gilson,et al. Comparing Ligand Interactions with Multiple Receptors via Serial Docking , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[52] B. Shoichet,et al. Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[53] G. Klebe,et al. Successful virtual screening for a submicromolar antagonist of the neurokinin-1 receptor based on a ligand-supported homology model. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[54] Brian K Shoichet,et al. Testing a flexible-receptor docking algorithm in a model binding site. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.
[55] A. Sali,et al. Alignment of protein sequences by their profiles , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[56] Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.
[57] Takayoshi Kinoshita,et al. A highly potent non-nucleoside adenosine deaminase inhibitor: efficient drug discovery by intentional lead hybridization. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[58] E. Bradley,et al. Performance of 3D-database molecular docking studies into homology models. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[59] Chi‐Huey Wong,et al. HIV-1 protease: mechanism and drug discovery. , 2003, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.
[60] Charles L. Brooks,et al. Detailed analysis of grid‐based molecular docking: A case study of CDOCKER—A CHARMm‐based MD docking algorithm , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..
[61] D. Diller,et al. Kinases, homology models, and high throughput docking. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[62] M L Teodoro,et al. Conformational flexibility models for the receptor in structure based drug design. , 2003, Current pharmaceutical design.
[63] S. Teague. Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[64] B. Shoichet,et al. Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[65] Ruben Abagyan,et al. Nuclear hormone receptor targeted virtual screening. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[66] Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al. Structure‐based identification of binding sites, native ligands and potential inhibitors for G‐protein coupled receptors , 2003, Proteins.
[67] T. Kinoshita,et al. Structure-based de novo design of non-nucleoside adenosine deaminase inhibitors. , 2003, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.
[68] Keiji Tanaka,et al. Binding mode of ecdysone agonists to the receptor: comparative modeling and docking studies , 2003, Journal of molecular modeling.
[69] Michael K. Gilson,et al. Enhanced docking with the mining minima optimizer: Acceleration and side‐chain flexibility , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..
[70] Didier Rognan,et al. Protein‐based virtual screening of chemical databases. II. Are homology models of g‐protein coupled receptors suitable targets? , 2002, Proteins.
[71] Osvaldo Olmea,et al. MAMMOTH (Matching molecular models obtained from theory): An automated method for model comparison , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[72] B. Matthews,et al. A model binding site for testing scoring functions in molecular docking. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.
[73] A. Sali,et al. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. , 2000, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.
[74] J Andrew McCammon,et al. Studying enzyme binding specificity in acetylcholinesterase using a combined molecular dynamics and multiple docking approach. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[75] D. Moras,et al. Molecular recognition of agonist ligands by RXRs. , 2002, Molecular endocrinology.
[76] J. Mccammon,et al. Computational drug design accommodating receptor flexibility: the relaxed complex scheme. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[77] András Fiser,et al. Molecular Biophysics , 2022 .
[78] I. Enyedy,et al. Discovery of small-molecule inhibitors of Bcl-2 through structure-based computer screening. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[79] A. Sali,et al. Protein Structure Prediction and Structural Genomics , 2001, Science.
[80] Andrzej Kolinski,et al. Model of three‐dimensional structure of vitamin D receptor and its binding mechanism with 1α,25‐dihydroxyvitamin D3 , 2001, Proteins.
[81] R Abagyan,et al. High-throughput docking for lead generation. , 2001, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[82] Richard Bonneau,et al. Ab initio protein structure prediction: progress and prospects. , 2001, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.
[83] T. Bishop,et al. Homology modeling using multiple molecular dynamics simulations and docking studies of the human androgen receptor ligand binding domain bound to testosterone and nonsteroidal ligands. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[84] R M Stroud,et al. Approaches to solving the rigid receptor problem by identifying a minimal set of flexible residues during ligand docking. , 2001, Chemistry & biology.
[85] Thomas Lengauer,et al. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.
[86] Peter W. Rose,et al. Parallel simulated tempering dynamics of ligand–protein binding with ensembles of protein conformations , 2001 .
[87] M Rarey,et al. Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[88] Haiyan Liu,et al. Structure-based ligand design for flexible proteins: Application of new F-DycoBlock , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[89] A. Spada,et al. Crystal structures of human factor Xa complexed with potent inhibitors. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[90] H. Broughton,et al. A method for including protein flexibility in protein-ligand docking: improving tools for database mining and virtual screening. , 2000, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[91] D. Baker,et al. A surprising simplicity to protein folding , 2000, Nature.
[92] Ernst Althaus,et al. A combinatorial approach to protein docking with flexible side-chains , 2000, RECOMB '00.
[93] Gerhard Klebe,et al. Recent developments in structure-based drug design , 2000, Journal of Molecular Medicine.
[94] M. Murcko,et al. Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[95] T Lengauer,et al. Two-stage method for protein-ligand docking. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[96] Harold A. Scheraga,et al. Flexible docking simulations: Scaled collective variable Monte Carlo minimization approach using Bezier splines, and comparison with a standard Monte Carlo algorithm , 1999, J. Comput. Chem..
[97] A. Sali. 100,000 protein structures for the biologist , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.
[98] Gennady M Verkhivker,et al. Predicting structural effects in HIV‐1 protease mutant complexes with flexible ligand docking and protein side‐chain optimization , 1998, Proteins.
[99] J. Tainer,et al. Screening a peptidyl database for potential ligands to proteins with side‐chain flexibility , 1998, Proteins.
[100] Amedeo Caflisch,et al. Docking small ligands in flexible binding sites , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..
[101] F E Cohen,et al. Leishmania major: molecular modeling of cysteine proteases and prediction of new nonpeptide inhibitors. , 1997, Experimental parasitology.
[102] Haruki Nakamura,et al. Flexible docking of a ligand peptide to a receptor protein by multicanonical molecular dynamics simulation , 1997 .
[103] P Willett,et al. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.
[104] I. Kuntz,et al. Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.
[105] Robert Huber,et al. X-ray Structure of Active Site-inhibited Clotting Factor Xa , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[106] R J Fletterick,et al. Structure-based design of parasitic protease inhibitors. , 1996, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.
[107] A Sali,et al. Comparative protein modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1996, Molecular medicine today.
[108] Daniel A. Gschwend,et al. Molecular docking towards drug discovery , 1996, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.
[109] C. Hodge,et al. Fitting an inhibitor into the active site of thermolysin: A molecular dynamics case study , 1996, Proteins.
[110] R. Laskowski. SURFNET: a program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions. , 1995, Journal of molecular graphics.
[111] Andrej ⩽ali,et al. Comparative protein modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints , 1995 .
[112] D. Abendschein,et al. Role of thrombin compared with factor Xa in the procoagulant activity of whole blood clots. , 1995, Circulation.
[113] T. Bhat,et al. Structure of HIV-1 protease with KNI-272, a tight-binding transition-state analog containing allophenylnorstatine. , 1995, Structure.
[114] Pieter F. W. Stouten,et al. A molecular mechanics/grid method for evaluation of ligand–receptor interactions , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..
[115] Yuan-Ping Pang,et al. Prediction of the binding sites of huperzine A in acetylcholinesterase by docking studies , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[116] H J Berendsen,et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of the docking of substrates to proteins , 1994, Proteins.
[117] A. Leach,et al. Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.
[118] T. Blundell,et al. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.
[119] D. M. Ryan,et al. Rational design of potent sialidase-based inhibitors of influenza virus replication , 1993, Nature.
[120] I. Kuntz. Structure-Based Strategies for Drug Design and Discovery , 1992, Science.
[121] I. Kuntz,et al. Automated docking with grid‐based energy evaluation , 1992 .
[122] S. Kim,et al. "Soft docking": matching of molecular surface cubes. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.
[123] Conrad C. Huang,et al. The MIDAS display system , 1988 .
[124] J M Blaney,et al. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.
[125] S. Shapiro,et al. An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .
[126] F. Wilcoxon. Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .
[127] Michael K. Gilson,et al. Screening Drug-Like Compounds by Docking to Homology Models: A Systematic Study , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[128] A. Caflisch,et al. Functional plasticity in the substrate binding site of beta-secretase. , 2005, Structure.
[129] Andrej Sali,et al. Comparative Protein Structure Modeling and its Applications to Drug Discovery , 2004 .
[130] Gerhard Klebe,et al. Ligand-supported homology modeling of g-protein-coupled receptor sites: models sufficient for successful virtual screening. , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.
[131] Jung-Hsin Lin,et al. The relaxed complex method: Accommodating receptor flexibility for drug design with an improved scoring scheme. , 2003, Biopolymers.
[132] Harvey Rubin,et al. Cysteine proteinases from distinct cellular compartments are recruited to phagocytic vesicles by Entamoeba histolytica. , 2002, Molecular and biochemical parasitology.
[133] D. Goodsell,et al. Automated docking to multiple target structures: Incorporation of protein mobility and structural water heterogeneity in AutoDock , 2002, Proteins.
[134] Youngshang Pak,et al. Application of a Molecular Dynamics Simulation Method with a Generalized Effective Potential to the Flexible Molecular Docking Problems , 2000 .
[135] T. N. Bhat,et al. The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..
[136] Amedeo Caflisch,et al. Docking by Monte Carlo minimization with a solvation correction: Application to an FKBP - substrate complex , 1997, J. Comput. Chem..
[137] Steven E. Ealick,et al. Pharmacologically relevant proteins , 1993 .