Consumer perception of probiotic yogurt: Performance of check all that apply (CATA), projective mapping, sorting and intensity scale

Abstract The performance of check-all-that-apply (CATA), projective mapping, sorting and intensity scales was assessed for determining consumer perception of probiotic yogurts, two prototypes added with glucose oxidase, a potential oxygen scavenger and 04 commercial brands available in the Brazilian market. Each sensory methodology was tested by administrating the tests to 30 regular consumers of the product. Napping and CATA did not provide adequate discrimination of the samples while better results were noted for sorting and intensity scales, separating the yogurts containing glucose oxidase from the commercial probiotic yogurt. Sensory methodologies using consumer responses present potential options for the characterization of food matrices with multiple sensory sensations, such as probiotic yogurt.

[1]  R. Cadena,et al.  Reduced fat and sugar vanilla ice creams: sensory profiling and external preference mapping. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  R. N. Cavalcanti,et al.  Developing a prebiotic yogurt: Rheological, physico-chemical and microbiological aspects and adequacy of survival analysis methodology , 2013 .

[3]  Paula Varela,et al.  Effects of food package information and sensory characteristics on the perception of healthiness and the acceptability of enriched biscuits , 2012 .

[4]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Application of a check-all-that-apply question for the evaluation of strawberry cultivars from a breeding program. , 2010, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[5]  J. Delarue,et al.  Highlight of important product characteristics for consumers. Comparison of three sensory descriptive methods performed by consumers , 2011 .

[6]  H. Lawless,et al.  Taste properties of potassium chloride alone and in mixtures with sodium chloride using a check-all-that-apply method. , 2012, Journal of food science.

[7]  Gastón Ares,et al.  EXTERNAL PREFERENCE MAPPING OF COMMERCIAL ANTIAGING CREAMS BASED ON CONSUMERS' RESPONSES TO A CHECK‐ALL‐THAT‐APPLY QUESTION , 2011 .

[8]  Gastón Ares,et al.  CONSUMERS' TEXTURE PERCEPTION OF MILK DESSERTS. I – RELATIONSHIP WITH RHEOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS , 2012 .

[9]  Rosires Deliza,et al.  PARAFAC: Adjustment for modeling consumer study covering probiotic and conventional yogurt , 2012 .

[10]  J. Lucey Cultured dairy products: an overview of their gelation and texture properties , 2004 .

[11]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Sensory Evaluation of Food , 1999 .

[12]  G. Hough,et al.  Analysis of data from a free-listing study of menus by different income-level populations , 2012 .

[13]  R. N. Cavalcanti,et al.  Processing optimization of probiotic yogurt containing glucose oxidase using response surface methodology. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  R. Cadena,et al.  Effect of the inoculation level of Lactobacillus acidophilus in probiotic cheese on the physicochemical features and sensory performance compared with commercial cheeses. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  H. Bolini,et al.  Stability of probiotic yogurt added with glucose oxidase in plastic materials with different permeability oxygen rates during the refrigerated storage , 2013 .

[16]  H. Macfie,et al.  DESIGNS TO BALANCE THE EFFECT OF ORDER OF PRESENTATION AND FIRST-ORDER CARRY-OVER EFFECTS IN HALL TESTS , 1989 .

[17]  Ronan Symoneaux,et al.  Comment analysis of consumer’s likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping. A case study on apples , 2012 .

[18]  Dominique Valentin,et al.  Sort and beer: Everything you wanted to know about the sorting task but did not dare to ask , 2011 .

[19]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices , 1998 .

[20]  Patricia Stefanowicz,et al.  Sensory evaluation of food principles and practices , 2013 .

[21]  Hildegarde Heymann,et al.  PROJECTIVE MAPPING AND DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF MILK AND DARK CHOCOLATES , 2009 .

[22]  G. Ares,et al.  CONSUMERS' CREAMINESS CONCEPT PERCEPTION: A CROSS‐CULTURAL STUDY IN THREE SPANISH‐SPEAKING COUNTRIES , 2011 .

[23]  Paula Varela,et al.  Exploring consumer product profiling techniques and their linkage to a quantitative descriptive analysis. , 2010 .

[24]  R. Symoneaux,et al.  Understanding apple consumers’ expectations in terms of likes and dislikes. Use of comment analysis in a cross-cultural study , 2013, Appetite.

[25]  C. J. Findlay,et al.  Experimental consideration for the use of check‐all‐that‐apply questions to describe the sensory properties of orange juices , 2013 .

[26]  Gastón Ares,et al.  APPLICATION OF TWO CONSUMER PROFILING TECHNIQUES TO COSMETIC EMULSIONS , 2010 .

[27]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Validation of two Napping techniques as rapid sensory screening tools for high alcohol products. , 2013 .

[28]  Young-Seung Lee,et al.  The application of check-all-that-apply (CATA) consumer profiling to preference mapping of vanilla ice cream and its comparison to classical external preference mapping , 2010 .

[29]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Use of an open-ended question to identify drivers of liking of milk desserts. Comparison with preference mapping techniques , 2010 .

[30]  Sensory profile of traditional and light versions of commercial strawberry yogurt. , 2010 .

[31]  G. Ares,et al.  Perfume Odor Categorization: To What Extent Trained Assessors and Consumers Agree? , 2013 .

[32]  El Mostafa Qannari,et al.  Taxonomic free sorting , 2012 .

[33]  Ronan Symoneaux,et al.  Using the free comments method for sensory characterisation of Cabernet Franc wines: Comparison with classical profiling in a professional context , 2013 .

[34]  Paula Varela,et al.  Packaging information as a modulator of consumers’ perception of enriched and reduced-calorie biscuits in tasting and non-tasting tests , 2012 .

[35]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Identifying ideal products using three different consumer profiling methodologies. Comparison with external preference mapping , 2011 .

[36]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization , 2012 .

[37]  Gastón Ares,et al.  CONSUMERS' TEXTURE PERCEPTION OF MILK DESSERTS. II – COMPARISON WITH TRAINED ASSESSORS' DATA , 2012 .

[38]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Perceptual mapping of apples and cheeses using projective mapping and sorting. , 2010 .

[39]  G. Hough,et al.  Free listing: A method to gain initial insight of a food category , 2010 .

[40]  Gabriel Favalli Branco,et al.  Probiotic Dairy Products as Functional Foods. , 2010, Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety.

[41]  M. Miller,et al.  Sensory and microbiological quality of yogurt drinks with prebiotics and probiotics. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[42]  Gastón Ares,et al.  APPLICATION OF A CHECK‐ALL‐THAT‐APPLY QUESTION TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHOCOLATE MILK DESSERTS , 2010 .

[43]  P. Lollo,et al.  Probiotic yogurts manufactured with increased glucose oxidase levels: postacidification, proteolytic patterns, survival of probiotic microorganisms, production of organic acid and aroma compounds. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[44]  Koushik Adhikari,et al.  Sensory characteristics of peach-flavored yogurt drinks containing prebiotics and synbiotics , 2011 .

[45]  Dominique Valentin,et al.  What is the validity of the sorting task for describing beers? A study using trained and untrained assessors , 2008 .

[46]  Azzurra Annunziata,et al.  Consumer perception of functional foods: A conjoint analysis with probiotics☆ , 2013 .

[47]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Comparison of two sensory profiling techniques based on consumer perception , 2010 .

[48]  Leticia Vidal,et al.  Influence of Information on Consumers' Evaluations Using Check‐All‐That‐Apply Questions and Sorting: A Case Study with Milk Desserts , 2013 .

[49]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Temporal aspects of yoghurt texture perception , 2013 .

[50]  Evandro Bona,et al.  Consumer acceptability and purchase intent of probiotic yoghurt with added glucose oxidase using sensometrics, artificial neural networks and logistic regression , 2011 .

[51]  D. Valentin,et al.  A cross-cultural study using Napping®: Do Korean and French consumers perceive various green tea products differently? , 2013 .

[52]  Aziz Homayouni Rad,et al.  Evaluation of Probiotic Survivability in Yogurt Exposed To Cold Chain Interruption , 2013, Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR.

[53]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Are consumer profiling techniques equivalent for some product categories? The case of orange-flavoured powdered drinks , 2011 .

[54]  Sylvie Chollet,et al.  Invited review Quick and dirty but still pretty good: a review of new descriptive methods in food science , 2012 .

[55]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Influence of brand information on consumers’ expectations and liking of powdered drinks in central location tests , 2010 .

[56]  J. Kennedy,et al.  EVALUATION OF REPLICATED PROJECTIVE MAPPING OF GRANOLA BARS , 2010 .

[57]  N. Martin,et al.  Influence of proteins on the perception of flavored stirred yogurts. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[58]  Ricardo Adolfo Parra Huertas Yogur en la salud humana , 2012 .

[59]  A. G. Cruz,et al.  Glucose oxidase: A potential option to decrease the oxidative stress in stirred probiotic yogurt , 2012 .

[60]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  Rapid descriptive sensory methods – Comparison of Free Multiple Sorting, Partial Napping, Napping, Flash Profiling and conventional profiling , 2012 .