What is on your mind? Using the perceptual cycle model and critical decision method to understand the decision-making process in the cockpit

Aeronautical decision-making is complex as there is not always a clear coupling between the decision made and decision outcome. As such, there is a call for process-orientated decision research in order to understand why a decision made sense at the time it was made. Schema theory explains how we interact with the world using stored mental representations and forms an integral part of the perceptual cycle model (PCM); proposed here as a way to understand the decision-making process. This paper qualitatively analyses data from the critical decision method (CDM) based on the principles of the PCM. It is demonstrated that the approach can be used to understand a decision-making process and highlights how influential schemata can be at informing decision-making. The reliability of this approach is established, the general applicability is discussed and directions for future work are considered. Practitioner Summary: This paper introduces the PCM, and the associated schema theory, as a framework to structure and explain data collected from the CDM. The reliability of both the method and coding scheme is addressed.

[1]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Internal representations, external representations and ergonomics: towards a theoretical integration , 2009 .

[2]  M. Lombard,et al.  Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability , 2002 .

[3]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  A Methodology for Assessing Safety Programs Targeting Human Error in Aviation , 2009 .

[4]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  The Field Guide to Understanding 'Human Error' , 2014 .

[5]  N. Stanton,et al.  Is situation awareness all in the mind? , 2010 .

[6]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Why Did the Pilots Shut Down the Wrong Engine? Explaining Errors in Context Using Schema Theory and the Perceptual Cycle Model , 2012 .

[7]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[8]  F. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology , 1932 .

[9]  D. Norman.  Categorization of action slips. , 1981 .

[10]  Renée Elio,et al.  Modeling Novice-to-Expert Shifts in Problem-Solving Strategy and Knowledge Organization , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Cognitive compatibility of motorcyclists and car drivers. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  P.A. Hancock,et al.  Individuation: the N = 1 revolution , 2009 .

[13]  Taryn Elliott,et al.  Expert Decision-Making in Naturalistic Environments: A Summary of Research , 2005 .

[14]  Kip Smith,et al.  Situation Awareness Is Adaptive, Externally Directed Consciousness , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[15]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Cognition And Reality , 1976 .

[16]  Ann Williamson,et al.  Skills, rules and knowledge in aircraft maintenance: errors in context , 2002, Ergonomics.

[17]  Chester H. McCall,et al.  The Application of Interrater Reliability as a Solidification Instrument in a Phenomenological Study , 2005 .

[18]  D E Maurino,et al.  Human factors and aviation safety: what the industry has, what the industry needs. , 2000, Ergonomics.

[19]  Nigel Shadbolt,et al.  Use of the Critical Decision Method to Elicit Expert Knowledge: A Case Study in the Methodology of Cognitive Task Analysis , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[20]  John R. Wilson,et al.  Mental Models: Theory and Application in Human Factors , 1989 .

[21]  Gary Klein,et al.  Rapid Decision Making on the Fire Ground , 1986 .

[22]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[23]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge" in the psychology of computer vision , 1975 .

[24]  Michael W. Singletary.  Mass Communication Research: Contemporary Methods and Applications , 1993 .

[25]  David A. Lieberman.  Human Learning and Memory , 2012 .

[26]  J. Reason.  Human error: models and management , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[27]  David O'Hare,et al.  Eliciting Information Portrayal Requirements: Experiences with the Critical Decision Method , 1997, BCS HCI.

[28]  R. B. Stammers,et al.  Bartlett and the future of ergonomics , 2008, Ergonomics.

[29]  Elizabeth R. Towell,et al.  Aviation human factors: a framework for the new millennium , 1999 .

[30]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Distributed Decision Making in Multihelicopter Teams: Case Study of Mission Planning and Execution from a Noncombatant Evacuation Operation Training Scenario , 2010 .

[31]  Peter A. Simpson,et al.  Naturalistic Decision Making in Aviation Environments , 2001 .

[32]  Thomas Abel,et al.  From Text to Codings: Intercoder Reliability Assessment in Qualitative Content Analysis , 2008, Nursing research.

[33]  Charles H Morris,et al.  Pilot mental workload: how well do pilots really perform? , 2006, Ergonomics.

[34]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Exploring the psychological factors involved in the Ladbroke Grove rail accident. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[35]  B Crandall,et al.  Critical decision method: A technique for eliciting concrete assessment indicators from the intuition of NICU nurses , 1993, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[36]  D O'Hare,et al.  Cognitive task analyses for decision centred design and training. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[37]  N. Stanton,et al.  The explanatory power of Schema Theory: theoretical foundations and future applications in Ergonomics , 2013, Ergonomics.

[38]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  The famous five factors in teamwork: a case study of fratricide , 2010, Ergonomics.

[39]  Roberta Calderwood,et al.  Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[40]  Gary Klein,et al.  Working Minds: A Practitioner's Guide to Cognitive Task Analysis , 2006 .

[41]  P. Johnson-Laird.  Mental models , 1989 .

[42]  N A Stanton,et al.  Using social network analysis and agent-based modelling to explore information flow using common operational pictures for maritime search and rescue operations , 2013, Ergonomics.