Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations

In this paper, we examine the emergence of resources. Our analysis of technological capability acquisition by global U.S.-based chemical firms shows that the emergence of resources is inherently evolutionary. We find that path-creating search that generates resource heterogeneity is a response to idiosyncratic situations faced by firms in their local searches. Two such idiosyncratic situations—technology exhaustion and expansion beyond national markets—trigger firms in our sample to create unique innovation search paths. We also find that along a given path firms experiment in order to find the correct investment—in fact, some organizations seem to take a step backward for two steps forward—further demonstrating the evolutionary nature of the resource creation process. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[2]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[3]  K. Pavitt,et al.  The technological competencies of the world''s largest firms , 1997 .

[4]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[5]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[6]  Jeffrey A. Martin,et al.  CROSS-BUSINESS SYNERGY: RECOMBINATION, MODULARITY AND THE MULTI-BUSINESS TEAM. , 2003 .

[7]  Terry L. Amburgey,et al.  Strategic momentum: The effects of repetitive, positional, and contextual momentum on merger activity , 1992 .

[8]  James G. March,et al.  Adaptive Coordination of a Learning Team , 1987 .

[9]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Paradox of Success: An Archival and a Laboratory Study of Strategic Persistence Following Radical Environmental Change , 2000 .

[10]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978-1988. , 1990 .

[11]  Christoph Zott,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND THE EMERGENCE OF INTRAINDUSTRY DIFFERENTIAL FIRM PERFORMANCE: INSIGHTS FROM A SIMULATION STUDY , 2003 .

[12]  James W. Fredrickson,et al.  Inertia And Creeping Rationality In Strategic Decision Processes , 1989 .

[13]  R. Henderson.  The evolution of integrative capability: innovation in cardiovascular drug discovery , 1994 .

[14]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Old Is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Lars Håkanson,et al.  Internationalization of R&D -- a survey of some recent research , 1993 .

[16]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .

[17]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[18]  P. Bierly,et al.  Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry , 1996 .

[19]  Estelle Brodman,et al.  Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (Book Review) , 1978 .

[20]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[21]  Andrew Hargadon,et al.  When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of the Electric Light , 2001 .

[22]  Lori Rosenkopf.  BEYOND LOCAL SEARCH : BOUNDARY-SPANNING , EXPLORATION AND IMPACT IN THE OPTICAL DISC INDUSTRY Running Head : “ Beyond Local Search ” , 2000 .

[23]  Michael Grüninger,et al.  Introduction , 2002, CACM.

[24]  R. Merton.  Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. , 1957 .

[25]  R. Pouder,et al.  Hot Spots and Blind Spots: Geographical Clusters of Firms and Innovation , 1996 .

[26]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[27]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history , 2002 .

[28]  B. Kogut,et al.  Technological Platforms and Diversification , 1996 .

[29]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[30]  R. Nelson.  Recent Evolutionary Theorizing about Economic Change , 2005, Technology, Institutions, and Economic Growth.

[31]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[32]  Richard D. Walker,et al.  Patents as scientific and technical literature , 1995 .

[33]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[34]  K. Clark,et al.  Integration and Dynamic Capability: Evidence from Product Development in Automobiles and Mainframe Computers , 1994 .

[35]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[36]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  How do multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations , 2004 .

[37]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[38]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[39]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge spillovers and the assignment of R&D responsibilities to foreign subsidiaries , 2004 .

[40]  S. Jackson,et al.  Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? , 1989 .

[41]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[42]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry , 1996 .

[43]  Timothy N. Carroll,et al.  The Coevolution of New Organizational Forms , 1999 .

[44]  L. Fleming.  Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search Lee Fleming , 2001 .

[45]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[46]  J. Papastavrou,et al.  Accounting for Endogeneity When Assessing Strategy Performance: Does Entry Mode Choice Affect Fdi Survival , 1998 .

[47]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Speeding Products to Market: Waiting Time to First Product Introduction in New Firms. , 1990 .

[48]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[49]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[50]  Leo Sveikauskas,et al.  The Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth. , 1986 .

[51]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[52]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .

[53]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[54]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .

[55]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[56]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Product Sequencing: Co-Evolution of Knowledge, Capabilities and Products. , 2000 .

[57]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Economic Analysis of Product Innovation: The Case of CT Scanners , 1990 .

[58]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos , 1998 .

[59]  E. Johnsen.  Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[60]  Riitta Katila,et al.  Exploiting technological opportunities: the timing of collaborations , 2003 .

[61]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[62]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  INNOVATION IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS: CONTROL AND COMMUNICATION PATTERNS IN INTERNATIONAL R&D OPERATIONS , 1998 .

[63]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[64]  N. Rosenberg.  Why do firms do basic research (with their own money) , 1990 .

[65]  S. Shane,et al.  The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research , 2000 .

[66]  P. Blau.  Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure , 1978 .

[67]  P. Barr,et al.  Cognitive change, strategic action and organizational renewal , 1993 .

[68]  J. W. van Rooij,et al.  Chemicals and long-term economic growth: insights from the chemical industry , 2001 .

[69]  A. Meyer.  Adapting to environmental jolts. , 1982, Administrative science quarterly.

[70]  D. Dougherty.  A PRACTICE-CENTERED MODEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL RENEWAL THROUGH PRODUCT INNOVATION , 1992 .

[71]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[72]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[73]  A. Knott.  Persistent heterogeneity and sustainable innovation , 2003 .

[74]  A. Arora,et al.  The Chemical Industry: From the 1850s until Today , 1999 .

[75]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  A Role-Based Ecology of Technological Change , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[76]  Danny Miller,et al.  Momentum and Revolution in Organizational Adaptation , 1980 .

[77]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Are Firms Superior to Alliances and Markets? An Empirical Test of Cross-Border Knowledge Building , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[78]  B. E. Burnham.  The other side of the story. , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[79]  N. Hood,et al.  The economics of multinational enterprise , 1979 .

[80]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[81]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Path-dependent and path-breaking change: reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the U.S. medical sector, 1978–1995 , 2000 .

[82]  Stephen E. Thomsen.  Multinational enterprises and the global economy , 1994 .

[83]  F. Narin,et al.  Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength , 1987 .

[84]  A. Stinchcombe.  Organizations and Social Structure , 1965 .

[85]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  How Breakthroughs Happen: The Surprising Truth About How Companies Innovate , 2003 .

[86]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[87]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[88]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[89]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[90]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[91]  R. Katila.  New Product Search Over Time: Past Ideas in Their Prime? , 2002 .

[92]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Integrating Knowledge in Groups: How Formal Interventions Enable Flexibility , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[93]  M. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .

[94]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Product Sequencing: Co-Evolution of Knowledge, Capabilities and Products , 2000 .

[95]  Shawn L. Berman,et al.  Tacit Knowledge as a Source of Competitive Advantage in the National Basketball Association , 2002 .

[96]  Albert B. Schwarzkopf,et al.  A study of innovation in the pesticide industry: Analysis of the innovation record of an industrial sector , 1987 .

[97]  G. Ahuja.  The duality of collaboration : Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages , 2000 .

[98]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[99]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[100]  Melissa E. Graebner.  Momentum and serendipity: how acquired leaders create value in the integration of technology firms , 2004 .

[101]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[102]  Manuel Trajtenberg.  Innovation in Israel 1968-97: a Comparative Analysis Using Patent Data , 1999 .

[103]  Walter Kuemmerle,et al.  Foreign Direct Investment in Industrial Research in the Pharmaceutical and Electronics Industries: Results from a Survey of Multinational Firms , 1999 .

[104]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D , 1994 .

[105]  Francis Narin,et al.  Is technology becoming science? , 1985, Scientometrics.

[106]  Arnoud Cyriel Leo,et al.  Management of international R&D operations , 1992 .

[107]  C. Freeman,et al.  The Economics of Industrial Innovation - 3rd Edition , 1997 .

[108]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[109]  Mark P. Carpenter,et al.  Linkage Between Basic Research Literature and Patents , 1980 .

[110]  John H. Holland,et al.  Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[111]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .