Kinase mutations and imatinib response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

PURPOSE Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) express constitutively activated mutant isoforms of KIT or kinase platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) that are potential therapeutic targets for imatinib mesylate. The relationship between mutations in these kinases and clinical response to imatinib was examined in a group of patients with advanced GIST. PATIENTS AND METHODS GISTs from 127 patients enrolled onto a phase II clinical study of imatinib were examined for mutations of KIT or PDGFRA. Mutation types were correlated with clinical outcome. RESULTS Activating mutations of KIT or PDGFRA were found in 112 (88.2%) and six (4.7%) GISTs, respectively. Most KIT mutations involved exon 9 (n = 23) or exon 11 (n = 85). All KIT mutant isoforms, but only a subset of PDGFRA mutant isoforms, were sensitive to imatinib, in vitro. In patients with GISTs harboring exon 11 KIT mutations, the partial response rate (PR) was 83.5%, whereas patients with tumors containing an exon 9 KIT mutation or no detectable mutation of KIT or PDGFRA had PR rates of 47.8% (P =.0006) and 0.0% (P <.0001), respectively. Patients whose tumors contained exon 11 KIT mutations had a longer event-free and overall survival than those whose tumors expressed either exon 9 KIT mutations or had no detectable kinase mutation. CONCLUSION Activating mutations of KIT or PDGFRA are found in the vast majority of GISTs, and the mutational status of these oncoproteins is predictive of clinical response to imatinib. PDGFRA mutations can explain response and sensitivity to imatinib in some GISTs lacking KIT mutations.

[1]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[2]  Nitin R. Patel,et al.  A Network Algorithm for Performing Fisher's Exact Test in r × c Contingency Tables , 1983 .

[3]  A. Ullrich,et al.  Human proto‐oncogene c‐kit: a new cell surface receptor tyrosine kinase for an unidentified ligand. , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[4]  Jürg Zimmermann,et al.  Effects of a selective inhibitor of the Abl tyrosine kinase on the growth of Bcr–Abl positive cells , 1996, Nature Medicine.

[5]  T. Meyer,et al.  Inhibition of the Abl protein-tyrosine kinase in vitro and in vivo by a 2-phenylaminopyrimidine derivative. , 1996, Cancer research.

[6]  S. Hirota,et al.  Gain-of-function mutations of c-kit in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors. , 1998, Science.

[7]  D. Kwiatkowski,et al.  Superiority of Denaturing High Performance Liquid Chromatography over single‐stranded conformation and conformation‐sensitive gel electrophoresis for mutation detection in TSC2 , 1999, Annals of human genetics.

[8]  S. Hirota,et al.  Effect of c-kit mutation on prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. , 1999, Cancer research.

[9]  C. Marshall,et al.  Mutations of c-kit JM domain are found in a minority of human gastrointestinal stromal tumors , 1999, Oncogene.

[10]  J. Lasota,et al.  Mutations in exon 11 of c-Kit occur preferentially in malignant versus benign gastrointestinal stromal tumors and do not occur in leiomyomas or leiomyosarcomas. , 1999, The American journal of pathology.

[11]  Stover,et al.  New anilinophthalazines as potent and orally well absorbed inhibitors of the VEGF receptor tyrosine kinases useful as antagonists of tumor-driven angiogenesis , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[12]  L. Sobin,et al.  Mutations in exons 9 and 13 of KIT gene are rare events in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. A study of 200 cases. , 2000, The American journal of pathology.

[13]  B. Druker,et al.  Inhibition of c-kit receptor tyrosine kinase activity by STI 571, a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor. , 2000, Blood.

[14]  J. Lasota,et al.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors – definition, clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features and differential diagnosis , 2000, Virchows Archiv.

[15]  J. Fletcher,et al.  KIT extracellular and kinase domain mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. , 2000, The American journal of pathology.

[16]  B. Druker,et al.  Abl protein-tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 inhibits in vitro signal transduction mediated by c-kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptors. , 2000, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[17]  J. Griffin,et al.  ARG tyrosine kinase activity is inhibited by STI571. , 2001, Blood.

[18]  C. Sawyers,et al.  Efficacy and safety of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  D. Tuveson,et al.  Effect of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 in a patient with a metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  C. Sawyers,et al.  Activity of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in the blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Philadelphia chromosome. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  C. J. Chen,et al.  KIT activation is a ubiquitous feature of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. , 2001, Cancer research.

[22]  Sigrid Stroobants,et al.  Safety and efficacy of imatinib (STI571) in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a phase I study , 2001, The Lancet.

[23]  Caroline Lohrisch,et al.  The Predictive Value of HER2 in Breast Cancer , 2001, Oncology.

[24]  T. Jacks,et al.  STI571 inactivation of the gastrointestinal stromal tumor c-KIT oncoprotein: biological and clinical implications , 2001, Oncogene.

[25]  P. N. Rao,et al.  Clinical Resistance to STI-571 Cancer Therapy Caused by BCR-ABL Gene Mutation or Amplification , 2001, Science.

[26]  D. Faigel,et al.  Fine‐needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors using morphology, immunocytochemistry, and mutational analysis of c‐kit , 2001, Cancer.

[27]  B. Druker,et al.  Molecular and chromosomal mechanisms of resistance to imatinib (STI571) therapy , 2002, Leukemia.

[28]  J. Kuriyan,et al.  Multiple BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations confer polyclonal resistance to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib (STI571) in chronic phase and blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2002, Cancer cell.

[29]  R. Herrmann,et al.  High frequency of point mutations clustered within the adenosine triphosphate-binding region of BCR/ABL in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia or Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia who develop imatinib (STI571) resistance. , 2002, Blood.

[30]  B. Bain,et al.  Response to imatinib mesylate in patients with chronic myeloproliferative diseases with rearrangements of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  A. D. Van den Abbeele,et al.  Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  J. Eary,et al.  Molecular targeting of platelet-derived growth factor B by imatinib mesylate in a patient with metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  Shan Zeng,et al.  The c-KIT mutation causing human mastocytosis is resistant to STI571 and other KIT kinase inhibitors; kinases with enzymatic site mutations show different inhibitor sensitivity profiles than wild-type kinases and those with regulatory-type mutations. , 2002, Blood.

[34]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Biology and genetic aspects of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: KIT activation and cytogenetic alterations. , 2002, Human pathology.

[35]  L. Sobin,et al.  Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach. , 2002, Human pathology.

[36]  M. Heinrich,et al.  KIT mutations are common in incidental gastrointestinal stromal tumors one centimeter or less in size. , 2002, The American journal of pathology.

[37]  Peter Marynen,et al.  A tyrosine kinase created by fusion of the PDGFRA and FIP1L1 genes as a therapeutic target of imatinib in idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  Samuel Singer,et al.  PDGFRA Activating Mutations in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors , 2003, Science.

[39]  Stephanie Green,et al.  Southwest Oncology Group standard response criteria, endpoint definitions and toxicity criteria , 1992, Investigational New Drugs.