The stretchiness of learning the digital mystery of learning in one-to-one environments in schools

The aim of the study is to generate knowledge of how teachers change their teaching and how pupils change their learning as a consequence of working in One-to-One environments in schools. The result shows that teachers and students are changing their relation to teaching and learning when school is digitized. The most important dimension of this change is that content related knowledge of the digitized learning in a one-to-one school, is a prerequisite for improved quality and better results in schools where digital artefacts are used. The results also show in what ways teachers must understand that knowledge is stretched between analogue and digital teaching and learning in the classroom.

[1]  Silvia Micheletta.  John Hattie, Visible Learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London & New York: Routledge (2009). John Hattie, Visible Learning for teachers. Maximizing impact on learning. London & New York: Routledge (2012). , 2013 .

[2]  Ann,et al.  Truth and method , 1994, Journal of Religion and Health.

[3]  S. Kvale.  Ten standard Objections to Qualitative Research Interviews , 1994 .

[4]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[5]  Laura M. O’Dwyer,et al.  Special Edition: Educational Outcomes and Research from 1:1 Computing Settings , 2010 .

[6]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[7]  Joke Voogt,et al.  Technology, innovation, and educational change : a global perspective : a report of the Second Information Technology in Education Study, Module 2 , 2003 .

[8]  Henrik Hegender.  Mellan akademi och profession. : Hur lärarkunskap formuleras och bedöms i verksamhetsförlagd lärarutbildning. , 2010 .

[9]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs , 2002 .

[10]  Ference Marton,et al.  The space of learning , 2004 .

[11]  François Guillemette,et al.  Handbook of Interview Research. Context and Method , 2003 .

[12]  L. Dahlgren,et al.  Conceptions of Mentoring: An Empirical Study of Conceptions of Mentoring during the School-Based Teacher Education. , 1996 .

[13]  John Hattie,et al.  Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement , 2008 .

[14]  Alexis Berry,et al.  Using Laptops to Facilitate Middle School Science Learning: The Results of Hard Fun. Research Brief. , 2009 .

[15]  Paul Anderson.  What Is Web 2.0 , 2016 .

[16]  Niclas Ekberg.  Lärares möten med sociala medier applikationer i behov av explikationer , 2012 .

[17]  David L. Silvernail,et al.  The Impact of Maine's One-to-One Laptop Program on Middle School Teachers and Students , 2004 .

[18]  Don Ihde,et al.  Consequences of phenomenology , 1986 .

[19]  Sara Dexter,et al.  Contributions of professional community to exemplary use of ICT , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[20]  Aristotle,et al.  THE NICOMACHEAN ETHICS , 1990 .

[21]  Mark E. Weston,et al.  The End of Techno-Critique: The Naked Truth about 1:1 Laptop Initiatives and Educational Change , 2010 .

[22]  L. Protheroe,et al.  Teaching by proxy: understanding how mentors are positioned in partnerships , 2004 .

[23]  S. Livingstone,et al.  Introduction to the First Edition (2002) the Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs , 2010 .

[24]  W. Doyle.  Learning the Classroom Environment: An Ecological Analysis , 1977 .

[25]  R. Ruiz,et al.  Sein und zeit , 2007 .

[26]  F. Marton.  Phenomenography — Describing conceptions of the world around us , 1981 .

[27]  Maximilian Bayer.  Classroom Discourse And The Space Of Learning , 2016 .

[28]  T. Kuhn.  The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[29]  P. Anderson.  What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education , 2007 .

[30]  Melanie T Joubanian.  Education Development Center , 2009 .

[31]  Cristina Masters,et al.  Bodies of Technology , 2005 .

[32]  Carol Ann Tomlinson,et al.  The Differentiated Classroom: Responding the Needs of All Learners , 1999 .

[33]  S. Kvale.  The Qualitative Research Interview , 1983 .

[34]  S. Livingstone,et al.  Handbook of new media : social shaping and social consequences of ICTs , 2006 .

[35]  R. Edwards,et al.  What Is Qualitative Interviewing , 2013 .

[36]  Roger Säljö,et al.  Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[37]  William R. Penuel,et al.  The Connected School: Technology and Learning in High School , 2001 .

[38]  Mary Shaw,et al.  Introduction to the First Edition , 1983 .

[39]  Karen Uhlenbeck,et al.  Introduction to the First Edition , 1991 .

[40]  A. Gitlin,et al.  Why Supervisors Behave as They Do: Relationship of Beliefs, Socialization, and Practice. , 1985 .

[41]  K. Cook.  In-depth interview , 2008 .